manlion
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2013
- Messages
- 7,568
- Reaction score
- -3
hope the court kicks goa police in groin for this stupidity.
police acting like its under a totalitarian govt, is that going to be norm from now on ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hope the court kicks goa police in groin for this stupidity.
i dont see any change in police, police in most Indian states are corrupt and bow to their masters.police acting like its under a totalitarian govt, is that going to be norm from now on ?
Yaaa then by your logic SALMAN RUSHDIE should be hailed for uttering muttering only the truthWell said! People who speak the truth are rarely looked upon favorably.
You my friend are sadly mistaken. Hamid Mir and Geo are traitors. Your admiration of them is understandable.
Yaaa then by your logic SALMAN RUSHDIE should be hailed for uttering muttering only the truth
And so is your admiration for ArundhatinRoy ....its verrryyy understandable.
Enemy's enemy is a friend isn't it??
I am on the same page Ravi.Actually I used to admire Arundhaty Roy for her stands. And enjoyed her sticking it to the male egoists both in the intellectual and political landscape in India.
On some aspects of Kashmir and Maoists she is right.
But she comes from the same brand of thought that ensures India remains mired in poverty, mediocrity.
I greatly admire her even to this day. It helps me to brand all far leftists as anti Indians or lunatics (depending on the occasion).I am on the same page Ravi.
I admired her once upon a time...
I greatly admire her even to this day. It helps me to brand all far leftists as anti Indians or lunatics (depending on the occasion).
You wouldn't have been admiring her if god forbid any of your relatives had been in that Jnaneswari express..Hypocrisy at its best.I greatly admire her even to this day. It helps me to brand all far leftists as anti Indians or lunatics (depending on the occasion).
"Colonise itself"? WTF does that mean?
I know that Ms Arundhati Roy is a talented writer, but even she cannot do this sort of sophistry with words.
Read it again. Braindead far leftists = asset we should and will protect.You wouldn't have been admiring her if god forbid any of your relatives had been in that Jnaneswari express..Hypocrisy at its best.
Read it again. Braindead far leftists = asset we should and will protect.
Cancer cells attack and kill the body from within, and that analogy would be appropriate for the seditious groups that Arundhati Roy sympathizes with. I'm not sure how a country can colonize itself, which means establishing colonies within itself, which doesn't seem to make sense. A nation's colony by definiton can only be set up away from home.Well , Cancer colonizes it's own body ... Doesn't it ?
I told you what it is.She is a terrorist sympathizer and actively supports anti-national activities, making her a terrorist herself. You, on the other hand is fooling none but yourself for taking a pin-hole view on the matter.I couldn't care less if you want to take it otherwise.Don't bother to lie. This is what you said, exactly, copied from your post:
Ohh.. stop patting you own back, will you ? The thread is about Arundhati Roy and her deliberate attempts to undermine the government and thereby the people of India, not about you.Quite obviously, having seen that the game is up, you are now trying to shift your ground. It was not about Arundhati Roy, it was about your foul libels about me that I challenged.
Once again, put up or shut up.
Are you so dense that you assume that supporting an individual's human rights is at the expense of denying the human rights of the victims of terrorist murder?
Of course not..But one has to see things in the light of the other intertwined events from a holistic point of view, before reaching to a conclusion.I have given it a thought and I will admit, advocating lynching was going a bit too far and that is wrong, I got carried away.But, there is no point denying the fact that her deliberate and repetitive abuse of the freedom extended to her by the constitution is obnoxious and tantamount to sedition.I am concerned about her freedom of speech, because of those like you who threaten it.
And I have never, ever failed to speak up for those who were the victims of terror. Read my posts.
Again.. stop patronizing yourself.I will tell you what is obvious.You being rhetorical, repeating words like freedom of expression and vehemently denying to see the bigger picture is obvious.If each and everyone starts to think like you then there will not be any India the way we see it today, for the diversity is way too much.It is in the very interest of the state that such separatist voices are toned down, for the sake of greater good.It is doing us no benefit..Talk about that if you have to, instead of trying to paint it me vs you,for that is infantile.Aren't you being a little obvious?
If you can't answer or are cornered, just compare the other person to Rahul Gandhi and everyone thinks you are the one right. That is infantile; try something better.
Come again please ? Pardon my poor comprehension skill.The language has always been foreign to me.Let's hear from you.
Who did the things you assert were done? The portions in bold?
Yes, I see the point there.My apologies.I was wrong.If we start behaving like those henchmen, then there is no difference between us and them.I would rather ask for a civilized way of dealing with the problem, and I do believe she should be brought to justice and should be made to answer in front of we, the people for her actions.The conscience is clear? Who's talking about conscience? We are discussing your ability to think straight. Unfortunately, from the evidence on display, your ability to think is not clear.
Next, are you really saying that Arundhati Roy is not free to sympathise with terrorists, and should be killed in an encounter because of what she says?
What does that say about your supporting terrorism and murder in your own turn? What is the difference between what you have suggested here, and what terrorists have done in J&K, or what Maoists do in Chhatisgarh?
Why should we not condemn you in the same terms as we have condemned, and will continue to condemn terrorists and Maoists?
And I find you absurd here, not a little. I was defending the right of an Indian citizen to her constitutional right of free speech, and you think that is anti-national. That is absurd, in the correct sense of the word. Your individual feelings and emotions do not decide who is to be granted her rights, and who is to be deprived of them. There are courts to decide that and you, for instance, are nowhere in the picture
Second, if you are really in the majority on this, then amend the Constitution; don't just sound off here and think that your views must prevail. There is nothing to distinguish you from any random passer-by. If anything, as @Bang Galore has pointed out - I would not have made that point in my favour, but since he has, I am using it - I have done my share for my country. Who are you, and what have you done? What gives you the right to judge my actions? And what makes you qualified to judge who is for the country and who is against it? How are you equal to me?