What's new

North Korea’s subamarine-launched ballistic missile a total success

pts_m_h_2016

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
200
Reaction score
-2
Country
France
Location
France
North Korea’s subamarine-launched ballistic missile a total success

http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_northkorea/758560.html

147219124709_20160827.JPG

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un celebrates the successful launch of a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) off North Korea’s coast into the East Sea off of Sinpo, North Hamgyong Province, Aug. 24. (Yonhap News)


Test launch confirms a number of technical advances, including high angle launch and cold launch
North Korea claimed that it had “completely achieved its operational goals on its key technological indicators” in its test launch of the Bukgeukseong (meaning “north star”, a KN-11 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM).
The material that North Korea made public on Aug. 25 shows that the missile was launched successfully without any major technical hitches, as North Korea claimed.
In a 1-minute, 47-second video of the missile launch shown on Korean Central Television, the missile emerges from the surface of the water with a roar trailed by a plume of flame once the countdown is complete.
Photos published by the Korea Central News Agency (KCNA) and the Rodong Sinmun newspaper also show a red plume of flame behind the missile during its launch.
Through this test, North Korea claimed that it had confirmed a number of capabilities: a high-angle launch from the greatest launch depth, the safety of the ballistic missile cold launch system, the operational characteristics of a solid-fuel engine, the aerodynamic characteristics per each stage of the ballistic missile during its flight after emerging from the water, the reliability of the stage separation system and the flight and guidance systems, and the accuracy of the warhead upon atmospheric reentry.

147219124700_20160827.JPG

24 photos of the submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) that was test launched on Aug. 24 by North Korea, appeared on pages 1-2 in the Aug. 25 edition of the Rodong Sinmun newspaper. These two photos compare the Aug. 24 launch with the previous launch on Apr. 23. On the more recent photo, there are grid fins (circled), which were not used in April. (Yonhap News)

These claims basically confirm speculation about the missile’s capabilities that appeared in the South Korean media on the day after the launch.
A high-angle launch means that the missile was fired at a higher angle than normal. Experts said that the SLBM traced a trajectory that climbed higher than 400 km and that if the missile had been fired at a normal maximum trajectory of 300 or 400 km, its range would have been 1,000 km, twice the 500 km that the missile traveled.
A cold launch is a method of firing a missile while a submarine is submerged. The missile is shot to the surface with highly compressed air, at which point the missile’s engines ignite to begin launch. North Korea also successfully implemented this procedure during its test in April.
The atmospheric reentry of the warhead also appeared to have taken place successfully.
North Korea did not provide any specific figures related to this. During atmospheric reentry, however, it is presumed that the missile fell from a height of about 50km at a maximum speed of around Mach 10 until its speed was abruptly reduced by atmospheric resistance.
“North Korea claims that it succeeded at atmospheric reentry, but since intercontinental ballistic missiles have a maximum falling speed of more than Mach 20, that is an entirely different issue,” said a South Korean military official who downplayed the significance of the claims.
North Korea’s use of a solid-fuel engine was also as expected. The large blaze of fire emitted from the rocket in the pictures and videos that North Korea released on Aug. 25 are being taken as the typical signs of a solid-fuel engine. “With a liquid-fuel engine, the nozzle means that the red plume is narrower and does not spread out as much. The difference is apparent to the naked eye,” said a South Korean military officer.

147211315925_20160826.JPG


North Korea initially had conducted SLBM test launches with a liquid-fuel engine. The liquid-fuel missile was presumed to be an adjustment of the R-27 missile developed by the Soviet Union in the 1960s.
During the test launch in April, North Korea switched to a solid-fuel engine, and the missile flew for just over 30 km.
In April, John Schilling, an American expert on missiles, discussed the change in an article published on North Korea-affairs website 38 North. “If the North is switching from liquid to solid propellant, the missile is pretty entirely new,” Schilling said. “Therefore, much of the progress the North has made so far will have been wasted effort.”
Schilling predicted that the new design of the missile could delay a successful test, but North Korea pulled off a successful launch of a solid-fuel missile within just four months.
The main fuel of North Korea’s ballistic missile program all use solid-fuel propellant: the Scud (with a range of 300-700 km), the Rodong (1,200km) and the Musudan (3,000km). North Korea’s only liquid-fuel ballistic missile is the KN-02 (120km).
Though North Korea released images of solid-fuel engine development in March, its actual technological level had been uncertain. Through this successful launch, North Korea has shown that it has reached a considerable level of expertise with solid-fuel missiles.
A change that was evident in the video footage released by North Korea was the attachment of grid fins to the bottom half of the SLBM. No such fins were to be seen in previous test launches.
A picture of a Musudan missile that ran in the Rodong Sinmun in June 23 also showed eight grid fins attached to the bottom half of the missile.
The grid fins are assumed to be supplemental wings that help the missile fly properly by balancing its center of mass.
 
.
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_northkorea/758413.html

[News analysis] North Korea’s SLBM becoming a threat much faster than expected


Distance of Aug. 24 launch into East Sea far outstripped previous launches and surpassed predictions
147211306503_20160826.JPG

The submarine-launched ballistic missile, in the early morning darkness in the East Sea off of Sinpo, Aug. 24. On the left, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un hugs one of the research scientists who developed the SLBM. (Yonhap News)

North Korea’s first successful test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) on Aug. 24 increases the likelihood that North Korea’s SLBMs will become a threat sooner than expected.
“At 5:30 am on Aug. 24, North Korea test fired one SLBM toward the East Sea from the waters near the city of Sinpo in South Hamgyong Province. The missile flew for about 500 km, which suggests that progress has been made over the past few test launches. South Korea and the US are currently carrying out a detailed analysis,” South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said on Aug. 24.
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) also confirmed that this was the launch of an SLBM, thought to be a Bukgeukseong (KN-11). An official with the US State Department said that the missile flew for 480 km (300 miles) and fell in Japan’s Air Defense Identification Zone (JADIZ).


This was the third time that Pyongyang launched an SLBM this year, and it came 46 days after the previous launch on July 9.
The test launch is believed to be part of North Korea’s SLBM development project, which North Korea has pushed ahead with during a time of faltering cooperation between its neighbors in Northeast Asia because of the conflict over the deployment of the THAAD missile defense system. On a political level, the test is also thought to register North Korea‘s opposition to the Ulchi-Freedom Guardian joint exercises that the South Korean and US militaries are conducting between Aug. 24 and Sep. 2.
The South Korean military reportedly regards the test launch as basically being a success. The SLBMs that North Korea tested on Apr. 23 and July 9 only flew about 30 km and 10 km, respectively.
Significantly, this SLBM reportedly managed to reach a height of 400 km. If the launch tube had been lowered to the ordinary angle, the missile could presumably have flown for more than 1,000 km.
The South Korean military has predicted that it would take North Korea between two and three years to produce a deployable SLBM. The predictions of civilian experts have been largely the same. In an article that was published on North Korea-affairs website 38 North two days after North Korea’s SLBM test launch on Apr. 23, John Schilling, an American expert on missiles, predicted that North Korea’s SLBM would become a legitimate threat in 2020.


147211306493_20160826.JPG

147211306493_20160826.JPG

The submarine-launched ballistic missile, which North Korea has been developing for the past one year and eight months, rising out of the water on Aug. 24, in a photo that appeared on pages 1-2 of the Aug. 25 edition of the Rodong Sinmun newspaper. In the smaller picture, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and air force commander Ri Byong-chol laugh and smoke while watching the launch. (Yonhap News)


The success of this launch is likely to accelerate that timetable, but does not mean that North Korea will be able to deploy the missile immediately. According to standard procedure, Pyongyang would need to increase the reliability of the missile through one or two years of additional test launches.
But the North has deployed missiles whose reliability has not been demonstrated through test launches. The Musudan missile, which is capable of reaching the US base on the Pacific island of Guam, was deployed in 2007 without being test launched.
If North Korea also rushes to deploy its SLBM without adequate testing, the South Korean military would probably have no choice but to take precautionary measures.
There are a number of factors expected to limit the strategic application of the missile, however. North Korea only has a single Gorae-class submarine (2,000 tons), the submarine that would operate the missile, and even that submarine is only equipped with one launch tube.
Amid the increasing likelihood of North Korea’s SLBMs becoming a real threat, the controversy about the military efficacy of deploying THAAD with US forces in South Korea is expected to be reignited.

South Korea and US have no measures to respond to North Korea SLBM

147211315925_20160826.JPG

If a North Korean submarine launches a ballistic missile to South Korea’s rear - in distant waters in the East Sea or South Sea, for example - it probably could not be shot down by THAAD interceptors.
“We are strengthening the capacity of Korean Air and Missile Defense through preparations to introduce a ballistic missile warning system,” said an official from South Korea’s Defense Ministry.
Called “Bukgeukseong” (meaning “North Star”) in North Korea and “KN-11” according to the American classification system, this SLBM is believed to have used a solid-fuel engine.
Until last year, North Korea has conducted test launches on liquid-fuel engines, but this year it switched to solid-fuel engines. Liquid fuel is not a safe choice for SLBMs, since it can slosh around in the tank when the missile is ejected from the submarine’s launch tube, causing the missile to wobble or the tank to rupture.
North Korea appears to have learned this lesson during its test launches last year and to have switched to a solid fuel engine.
Considering that this missile managed to achieve flight during the launch, many experts believe that the rockets’ two stages separated successfully.
North Korea claimed that the rocket stages separated successfully after its SLBM test launch in April, but the South Korean military argued that the separation was a failure, citing the fact that the missile only flew for about 30 km.
This missile flew for 500 km, which is a considerable performance considering that the Scud-B surface-to-surface ballistic missile has a range of 300 km.
If North Korea had filled the missile up with fuel and launched it from the standard angle, it would have flown much farther, more than 2,000 km, many analysts believe.
Since some of the fuel was removed from the SLBM before this test launch, however, it would likely only have flown for about 1,000 km even if it had been launched at the standard angle.
There has been no immediate confirmation of whether North Korea also used the launch to test the operation of a nuclear detonator.
After the SLBM launch in April, North Korea claimed that it had successfully carried out a test on the operation of a detonator for a nuclear warhead. The South Korean military dismissed the claim, stating that North Korea had not yet reached that stage of testing.

Much more impressive than anything Afro Middle Eastern Hindou countries can produce. Despite all the hardships imposed on this hermit dictatorship. With their High intelligence and good working culture the North Koreans can easily surpass their Southern brothers and Singaporeans in 20 years IF all the sanctions embargo and negative propaganda and acts of sabotage against them are terminated resulting in completely free flow of goods ideas people trade tourists and investment to and from North Korea for at least 20 continuous years, uninterrupted.

Video of the latest solid fuelled SLBM launch



 
. . .
Israel has no SLBM yet.

DPRK the most isolated and embargoed country.

I say it is a great job by DPRK. To its technicians, scientists and engineers persevering in difficult circumstances.
It doesn't need any and I wasn't even talking about Israel

We have a submarine launcher cruise missile with 1500km range
 
.
It is indeed quite an achievement for North Korea. I will say, quite a feat despite its moderate capabilities compare to bigger countries like Russia, US and China.

It doesn't need any and I wasn't even talking about Israel

We have a submarine launcher cruise missile with 1500km range
Cruise missile is different from SLBM. The technical difficulties for SLBM is much greater
 
.
It doesn't need any and I wasn't even talking about Israel

We have a submarine launcher cruise missile with 1500km range


You don't have SLBM, that's what I wrote. You agreed. So no need for discussing if you need SLBM. Just we discussed, you have no SLBM.

Your SLCM are not battle tested and even its launch was secretive, and cruise missiles, once detected, are easier to shoot down.
 
.
It is indeed quite an achievement for North Korea. I will say, quite a feat despite its moderate capabilities compare to bigger countries like Russia, US and China.


Cruise missile is different from SLBM. The technical difficulties for SLBM is much greater
For North Korea. Why use them then? especially if they're such a short range.

Cruise missiles are much better for those ranges.

You don't have SLBM, that's what I wrote. You agreed. So no need for discussing if you need SLBM. Just we discussed, you have no SLBM.

Your SLCM are not battle tested and even its launch was secretive, and cruise missiles, once detected, are easier to shoot down.
Yes, we don't have SLBM, just as most of the submarine users.
No SLCM is battle proven. Point is on if its detected, most of them are low RCS
 
.
For North Korea. Why use them then? especially if they're such a short range.

Cruise missiles are much better for those ranges.


Yes, we don't have SLBM, just as most of the submarine users.
No SLCM is battle proven. Point is on if its detected, most of them are low RCS


North Korea is merely flight testing its SLBM to iron out any issues. Who says the final range would be 1000 km?

Look here:

2000 km easily within range

And here

If this Polaris-1 or whatever DPRK calls it, is really a miniaturized ICBM, with good performance and solid fuelled making it less risky for launch and for submarines to be used as launch platform, then expect the performance range to inch up towards 4,000 km, may be higher in future.

Your popeye turbo cruise missile is not battle tested.
 
.
North Korea is merely flight testing its SLBM to iron out any issues. Who says the final range would be 1000 km?

Look here:

2000 km easily within range

And here

If this Polaris-1 or whatever DPRK calls it, is really a miniaturized ICBM, with good performance and solid fuelled making it less risky for launch and for submarines to be used as launch platform, then expect the performance range to inch up towards 4,000 km, may be higher in future.

Your popeye turbo cruise missile is not battle tested.
That's based on absolutely nothing.
Those North Koreans aren't smart at all. Face it.
 
. . .
?

I don't understand your sentence. Explain clearly.
That their SLBM would reach in the future up to 4000 kilometers, its based on nothing, even before their SLBMs they claimed they could nuke the US.
North Koreans aren't smart, if they were smart they at least could feed their own citizens.
 
.
That their SLBM would reach in the future up to 4000 kilometers, its based on nothing, even before their SLBMs they claimed they could nuke the US.
North Koreans aren't smart, if they were smart they at least could feed their own citizens.

You are incoherent.

Did you see the videos? These are South Korean media and analysts making the calculations.

North Koreans can feed themselves well, mostly.

Eliminate sanctions embargo and sabotage then they can surpass South Korea easily within 20 years.

Here is a video for you to learn

Eating in Korea has nothing to do with intelligence and SLBM. They are most isolated country.
 
.
You are incoherent.

Did you see the videos? These are South Korean media and analysts making the calculations.

North Koreans can feed themselves well, mostly.

Eliminate sanctions embargo and sabotage then they can surpass South Korea easily within 20 years.

Here is a video for you to learn

Eating in Korea has nothing to do with intelligence and SLBM. They are most isolated country.
Please tell him to get out of Pyongiyang and then find a resturant .
They wont surpass anyone with a dictator.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom