North Korean Rocket Said to Fail Moments After Liftoff

[ChineseTiger1986]

thats why we r preparing this for the heavier purpose just a few months more and this will be launched:

Nice rockets and good luck for the launch.

 

[timetravel]

Chinese space agency is good. but not as good as ISRO. Launching 10 satellites in 1 go, finding wate on moon, no CIVILIANS killed ever.. man great acheivements by ISRO. The top 3 agencies would be

USA, Russia and India

 

[Screambowl]

Lost face? Disappeared? Are you kidding me? The fact that microsatelites require innovative propulsion is because they have no way of propelling and storing information. The reason why India micro-satellite launched them in bulk is because they lack the technology to maneuver them and must align them in formation for information to be relayed back to earth. THAT IS HOW MICROSATELITES WORK. Major US/EU/RF/PRC/JAP launches are in standard size for a reason.

There is also a reason why North Korea can produce a microsatellite but not a standard one.


And wtf is rankopedia? Indians like you can just make an account and vote for India. We only have 30 million people. We can't beat the world's "largest democracy" in an internet election.

And don't BS me with BS from Wikipedia. Even Indians like you can edit it.

Indian satellites are working excellent and doing their job that's all is required. India has achieved proficiency in building all standard, mini and micro satellites. there is no need to worry. And Indian students have developed nanosats too.
I do not know in which world u are living.

here is the list of all Indian satellites..

List of Indian satellites - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Roybot]

All Russian, North Korean, Chinese, and Indian missiles derive from the Soviet Union. While Russian and Chinese missiles enjoy great success, Indian fails epically.

USSR - 2589 successful, 181 failed, 93.5% success rate
USA - 1152 successful, 164 failed, 87.5% success rate
EU - 117 sucessful, 12 failed, 90.7% success rate
China - 56 successful, 11 failed, 83.6% success rate
Japan - 52 successful, 9 failed, 85.2% success rate
India - 7 successful, 6 failed, 53.8% success rate

Space Launch Vehicle Reliability

Do not deny fact. Half of all Indian rockets fail and such is the quality of Indian scientists and engineers.

How old is this data?

35 Launches, 23 Success, 4 partial failures, 8 Failures.

65.71% Success Rate

More importantly Past 12 years(Since 2000)

22 Launches, 17 Success, 4 failures, 1 Partial Failure

77.27% Success rate


With two more PSLV launches lined up this year, and going by PSLVs 100% success rate in the past 12 years, that should push the success rate upto 80%. Most of the failures occurred in the 80's and early 90's.

 

[Aramsogo]

Chinese space agency is good. but not as good as ISRO. Launching 10 satellites in 1 go, finding wate on moon, no CIVILIANS killed ever.. man great acheivements by ISRO. The top 3 agencies would be

USA, Russia and India

You can't even make your own cryogenic engine. No manned space flight ever. No space plane. Your Agni 5 (if it works) isn't even a real ICBM (minimum 3500 miles). US and Russia all have plenty of deaths, it means nothing in the rankings. Indians are so silly with their silly logic.

 

[Screambowl]

You can't even make your own cryogenic engine. No manned space flight ever. No space plane. Your Agni 5 (if it works) isn't even a real ICBM (minimum 3500 miles). US and Russia all have plenty of deaths, it means nothing in the rankings. Indians are so silly with their silly logic.

kindly do not mix defence program with space program. In India they are two different things and are not collaborated-

 

[ao333]

Placing a satellite successfully in its intended orbit is a hard enough job.....placing multiple satellite is harder.......

what matters is the preciseness of the placement.....

The more precisely a satellite is placed in its orbit.....the better its functions can be utilized.......

And placing multiple satellites precisely in its orbit is definitely harder than placing one satellite....

Because of its difficulty, people don't want to send multiple satellites in one launch....


Ha ha......You seem to be dumber that I thought.....

What do you actually want to discuss here......satellite making capability or Launch vehicle making capability....

And there is nothing called "standard" satellite......weight of a satellite is not fixed....

Any country can make a Satellite....making a micro(light) or heavy satellite is according to their need.........
But few countries can make a launch vehicle..........
Even countries with NO launch capability have made heavy Satellites....which they launched with the help of others......




Then you give us your credible source....where it says CSA is better placed than ISRO....by comparing their achievements..

you already claimed that Canadians are better than Indians.....but alas! without any proof....

BUT when we give you proof of how worthless your space organisation(CSA) is, you simply deny everything...

Denying fact is always easier than facing it.

I don't deny facts nor quote my sources from Internet Elections and Wikipedia.

All Russian, North Korean, Chinese, and Indian missiles derive from the Soviet Union. While Russian and Chinese missiles enjoy great success, Indian fails epically.

USSR - 2589 successful, 181 failed, 93.5% success rate
USA - 1152 successful, 164 failed, 87.5% success rate
EU - 117 sucessful, 12 failed, 90.7% success rate
China - 56 successful, 11 failed, 83.6% success rate
Japan - 52 successful, 9 failed, 85.2% success rate
India - 7 successful, 6 failed, 53.8% success rate

Space Launch Vehicle Reliability

Do not deny fact. Half of all Indian rockets fail and such is the quality of Indian scientists and engineers.

And why are Canadians better?

Canada #10 nominal GDP per capita $51,147
India #136 nominal GDP per capita $1,527

We are wealthier than the Americans and 33 times wealthier than Indians.

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/02/weodata/weoselco.aspx?g=2001&sg=All+countries

Don't worry, this trolling isn't even close to my potential. I'm harder on the Chinese.

 

[oFFbEAT]

^^^^And Canada makes everything on their own........

Your space agency(CSA) can't even work alone........you collaborate with other agencies just to hide your incapabilities....

 

[pzkilo]

Chinese space agency is good. but not as good as ISRO. Launching 10 satellites in 1 go, finding wate on moon, no CIVILIANS killed ever.. man great acheivements by ISRO. The top 3 agencies would be

USA, Russia and India

What can I say?

 

[shuttler]

Launch history GSLV

All GSLV launches have been conducted from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota.

Flight Launch date/time (UTC) Variant Launch Pad Payload Payload Mass Result Note(s)

D1 18 April 2001
10:13 Mk.I(a) First GSAT-1 1,540 kg Failure Developmental Flight, payload placed into lower than planned orbit, and did not have sufficient fuel to reach a usable orbit.[9]

D2 8 May 2003
11:28 Mk.I(a) First GSAT-2 1,825 kg Success Developmental Flight[10]

F01 20 September 2004
10:31 Mk.I(b) First EDUSAT 1,950 kg Success First operational flight[11]

F02 10 July 2006
12:08 Mk.I(b) Second INSAT-4C 2,168 kg Failure Both rocket and satellite had to be destroyed over the Bay of Bengal after the rocket's trajectory veered outside of permitted limits.

F04 2 September 2007
12:51 Mk.I(b) Second INSAT-4CR 2,160 kg.Partial failure Partial launch failure,[12] apogee lower and inclination higher than expected, due to carrier rocket underperformance.[13] Eventually the 2160 kg payload reached the designated geostationary transfer orbit.[14][15] There were reports that the mission life of the satellite had decreased by five years as the thrusters had to burn this much fuel to restore the satellite to its correct orbit. However, the ISRO later refuted this claim dismissing it as false.[16]

D3 15 April 2010
10:57 Mk.II Second GSAT-4 2,220 kg Failure First flight test of the ISRO designed and built Cryogenic Upper Stage. Failed to reach orbit due to malfunction of Fuel Booster Turbo Pump (FBTP) of the Cryogenic Upper Stage.[17]

F06 25 December 2010
10:34 Mk.I (c) Second GSAT-5P 2,130 kg Failure First flight of GSLV Mk.I (c) Destroyed by range safety officer after loss of control of liquid fuelled boosters.[18]

Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You indians cannot lift anything heavier than 2 MT in space! The success rate of launching is horrendous!

what's the point of bragging your space, rocket launching technology better than us?

Our Long March 2 series has successfully lifted payloads exceeding 2 MTs into Higher Orbits some 20 to 30 years ago!

Long March (rocket family) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[shuttler]

Chinese missile supplied to NK failed miserably.. shows the capability of the chinese... chinese couldnt hide this one like countless others failed ones they hide.

ur success rate is defined by controlled media and by ccp figures...as manipulated as anything oculd be... check the success of PSLV? ANY comparison from China? no way. and check India is no 4 and China 5 in terms of space agency capability.

please dont tell me China cant keep a rocket failure hidden..

Those are horrible jokes or brainless accusations!

What are the spy sateliites of usa and russia doing in space? Watching boollywood movies?

That is ABSURD!

 

[shuttler]

Top 5 space agencies

1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration - US

2. European Space Agency - EU

3. Russian Federal Space Agency

4. Indian Space Research Organisation

5. China National Space Administration

Canada is no. 8

Rankopedia: Best Space Agency (Updated)

This is ridiculous!

these are rankings by random cyber users! what's the point again of bragging about it? (And I am sure a majority of indian cheerleaders have voted favourably for their country)!

 

[shuttler]

^^^^And Canada makes everything on their own........

Your space agency(CSA) can't even work alone........you collaborate with other agencies just to hide your incapabilities....

The scientists considered instrumental to the success of the Chandrayaan-1 project are:

G. Madhavan Nair – Chairman, Indian Space Research Organization
Dr. T. K. Alex – Director, ISAC (ISRO Satellite Centre)
Dr.Mylswamy Annadurai – Project Director, Chandrayan-1
S. K. Shivkumar – Director - Telemetry, Tracking and Command Network
Mr. M.Pitchaimani – Operations Director, Chandrayan-1
Mr. Leo Jackson John – Spacecraft Operations Manager, Chandrayan-1
Dr. K. Radhakrishnan (scientist) – Director, VSSC
George Koshy – Mission Director, PSLV-C11
Srinivasa Hegde – Mission Director, Chandrayaan-1
Prof. J N Goswami – Director of Physical Research Laboratory and Principal Scientific Investigator of Chandrayaan-1
Rajendra Masanta - Server Operation Lead Specialist - Pool - 19 Space Satellite
Anil Prasad - Server Operation Specialist - Pool - 19 Space Satellite

Chandrayaan-1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are these guys indian?

 

[oFFbEAT]

This is ridiculous!

these are rankings by random cyber users! what's the point again of bragging about it? (And I am sure a majority of indian cheerleaders have voted favourably for their country)!

Anything demeaning Chinese capabilities is ought to be ridiculus.....job of random cyber users.....
Chinese are super-intelligent fellas.....they are no.1 in the WORLD.....or may be UNIVERSE

If you think you are no.1.....then show us the proof.....otherwise STFU.....and learn to accept the truth.....

BUT Truth hurts doesn't it.....

 

[shuttler]

Anything demeaning Chinese capabilities is ought to be ridiculus.....job of random cyber users.....
Chinese are super-intelligent fellas.....they are no.1 in the WORLD.....or may be UNIVERSE

If you think you are no.1.....then show us the proof.....otherwise STFU.....and learn to accept the truth.....

BUT Truth hurts doesn't it.....

no you indian guys have to get the records straight and stop giving false / misleading information! and STFU!

we never claim no.1 but we are much better than you indians in rocket launching success rates! FACT!