What's new

North Korean Rocket Said to Fail Moments After Liftoff

Status
Not open for further replies.
how does a thread about nk rocket fail become india bashing?? why r indians being so stupid to keep replying?

Look at the the end of the article . That dumb *** had to add that
 
.
Chinese missile supplied to NK failed miserably.. shows the capability of the chinese... chinese couldnt hide this one like countless others failed ones they hide.
 
.
Look at the the end of the article . That dumb *** had to add that

Actually he started this thread to hide his inferiority complex......

He is frustrated by the in-achievements of Canadian Space Agency (CSA)......

CSA works in collaboration with other space agencies.....because their scientists are not capable of doing anything on their own........:lol:
 
. .
Chinese missile supplied to NK failed miserably.. shows the capability of the chinese... chinese couldnt hide this one like countless others failed ones they hide.
Maybe one day we'll have 50% sucess rate like India.
 
.
Maybe one day we'll have 50% sucess rate like India.

ur success rate is defined by controlled media and by ccp figures...as manipulated as anything oculd be... check the success of PSLV? ANY comparison from China? no way. and check India is no 4 and China 5 in terms of space agency capability.
 
.
Maybe one day we'll have 50% sucess rate like India.

may be in 50 years

ao333 started this thread to take a dig at India. In the bargain he lost face and disappeared
 
.
ur success rate is defined by controlled media and by ccp figures...as manipulated as anything oculd be... check the success of PSLV? ANY comparison from China? no way. and check India is no 4 and China 5 in terms of space agency capability.

Rocket launch failures cannot be hidden. That is because all rocket launches are tracked by earth observation satellites used to monitor ballistic missile launches.
 
.
Rocket launch failures cannot be hidden. That is because all rocket launches are tracked by earth observation satellites used to monitor ballistic missile launches.

please dont tell me China cant keep a rocket failure hidden.. :lol:
 
.
please dont tell me China cant keep a rocket failure hidden.. :lol:

If China can hide a rocket failure, it can hide ballistic missile launches. Do you think that China can launch a ballistic missile in absolute secret?
 
.
OK. Mr. Einstaein. Please enlighten us !

You said this : "Small satellites are not more sophisticated. They are just cheaper and easier to build and launch."

This is what Wikipedia says: "Micro/nanosats usually require innovative propulsion, attitude control, communication and computation systems."

Miniaturized satellite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And dont show your hubris here! You have 4th world mentality !

Rankopedia: Best Space Agency (Updated)


ISRO is no. 4

Canadian Space Agency is 8 :P

Lost face? Disappeared? Are you kidding me? The fact that microsatelites require innovative propulsion is because they have no way of propelling and storing information. The reason why India micro-satellite launched them in bulk is because they lack the technology to maneuver them and must align them in formation for information to be relayed back to earth. THAT IS HOW MICROSATELITES WORK. Major US/EU/RF/PRC/JAP launches are in standard size for a reason.

There is also a reason why North Korea can produce a microsatellite but not a standard one.


And wtf is rankopedia? Indians like you can just make an account and vote for India. We only have 30 million people. We can't beat the world's "largest democracy" in an internet election.


And don't BS me with BS from Wikipedia. Even Indians like you can edit it.
 
. .
If China can hide a rocket failure, it can hide ballistic missile launches. Do you think that China can launch a ballistic missile in absolute secret?
yes a failed one for sure, and must have hidden countless of them by now.
 
.
Lost face? Disappeared? Are you kidding me? The fact that microsatelites require innovative propulsion is because they have no way of propelling and storing information. The reason why India micro-satellite launched them in bulk is because they lack the technology to maneuver them and must align them in formation for information to be relayed back to earth. THAT IS HOW MICROSATELITES WORK. Major US/EU/RF/PRC/JAP launches are in standard size for a reason.

There is also a reason why North Korea can produce a microsatellite but not a standard one.


And wtf is rankopedia? Indians like you can just make an account and vote for India. We only have 30 million people. We can't beat the world's "largest democracy" in an internet election.


And don't BS me with BS from Wikipedia. Even Indians like you can edit it.

LoL Canadian talking about their space program, if it weren't for the American, you guys wouldn't even be able to launch a single satellite, India has failures in its launch program because it is developing its space launch capabilities, after the sanctions India started to develop its own launch platforms. And its not even a century since its independence.
 
.
Lost face? Disappeared? Are you kidding me? The fact that microsatelites require innovative propulsion is because they have no way of propelling and storing information. The reason why India micro-satellite launched them in bulk is because they lack the technology to maneuver them and must align them in formation for information to be relayed back to earth. THAT IS HOW MICROSATELITES WORK. Major US/EU/RF/PRC/JAP launches are in standard size for a reason.
Placing a satellite successfully in its intended orbit is a hard enough job.....placing multiple satellite is harder.......

what matters is the preciseness of the placement.....

The more precisely a satellite is placed in its orbit.....the better its functions can be utilized.......

And placing multiple satellites precisely in its orbit is definitely harder than placing one satellite....

Because of its difficulty, people don't want to send multiple satellites in one launch....

There is also a reason why North Korea can produce a microsatellite but not a standard one.
Ha ha......You seem to be dumber that I thought.....

What do you actually want to discuss here......satellite making capability or Launch vehicle making capability....

And there is nothing called "standard" satellite......weight of a satellite is not fixed....

Any country can make a Satellite....making a micro(light) or heavy satellite is according to their need.........
But few countries can make a launch vehicle..........
Even countries with NO launch capability have made heavy Satellites....which they launched with the help of others......


And wtf is rankopedia? Indians like you can just make an account and vote for India. We only have 30 million people. We can't beat the world's "largest democracy" in an internet election.

And don't BS me with BS from Wikipedia. Even Indians like you can edit it.

Then you give us your credible source....where it says CSA is better placed than ISRO....by comparing their achievements..

you already claimed that Canadians are better than Indians.....but alas! without any proof....

BUT when we give you proof of how worthless your space organisation(CSA) is, you simply deny everything...

Denying fact is always easier than facing it.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom