No thank you, Mr Javad Zarif, Iran’s proposal is unacceptable

[Crystal-Clear]

Saudis made 9/11 in 2015 in centre of holy Islam and I am not even mentioning according to 28 pages from the US Saudi regime was behind saudi hijackers in new york.

EVEN BIRDBRAINS CAN SIMPLY UNDERSTAND WHO IS DEVIL (WAHHABISM, SALAFIM, “ HORN OF SATAN” ) AND WHO IS FIGHTING AGAINST DEVIL (USA, ISRAEL, SAUDI, EMIRATE)

View attachment 562586

Mecca 5 pm = new yeark 10 am = 14 GMT

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=September_11_attacks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecca_crane_collapse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_28_pages

View attachment 562591

bullshit . that crane accident was an accident.

 

[Dubious]

Who says gulf states never attacked Iran ? It was Iraq which attacked Iran and millions of Muslims were killed on both sides in a war which lasted 9 years from 1979 to 1988

I didnt know Iraq was a Gulf state...

Interesting how you kind of forgot to mention who was backing Iraq/ Saddam back then...Ameircana

 

[Aramagedon]

bullshit . that crane accident was an accident.

Even by 0.0001% two 9/11s in Mecca & new york can’t be incident at the same and even time adding to that saudis supported 9/11 hijackers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_28_pages

The truth of saudi regime is extremely evil however I don’t go further because everyone can see the bright TRUTH...

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Even by 0.001% two 9/11 s in Mecca & new york can’t be incident at the same and even time adding to that saudis supported 9/11 hijackers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_28_pages

what you are trying to say is that they intentionally did that crane incident in Makkah . but why?

 

[Crystal-Clear]

To show the Muslims are terrorists [Allah forbid] and insulting the most holiest place of Muslims to disrespect Muslims.

View attachment 562600
View attachment 562599

The American plan to bomb Syrian terrorists [birthplace of Nusra and ISIL] back in 2001:

Mute the Sound

lol . my question remain the same but why?

 

[Avicenna]

Why name only one?

From your post it seems you are aware of more but you choose only 1?

I'm not sure what your trying to get at.

Please clarify so I can answer your question.

 

[Dubious]

any "muslim" majority nation taking as friends non-muslim majority nations against another muslim majority nation.

Care to share which Muslim majority nations are favouring who??

Your example however was limited to one:

SA/UAE working with the US against Iran is indefensible.

 

[Avicenna]

Care to share which Muslim majority nations are favouring who??

Your example however was limited to one:

Lets see here.

UAE/SA vs. Iran.

UAE/SA vs. Qatar.

Turkey vs. Egypt

Turkey with some tension with UAE.

I won't touch Syria. (super convoluted)

I won't mention Yemen as well.

These are just a brief list that comes to mind.

I address UAE/SA v Iran for one major reason.

Zooming out, the primary driver in the recent tensions IMO is Israel.

Its not a coincidence that Trump's first foreign visit was to SA.

Kushner is Netanyahoo's in to the WH and thus American policy.

This is all implementation of Israeli security needs.

Muslims will be muslims and focus on the short term and personal interests.

And Arabs will be Arabs and fight amognst each other and then make up and fight again.

Israel is the coolest calmest customer in the middle east and has the US in her hand.

While we muslims squabble with each other, there is ONLY ONE winner in any scenario that leads to escalation.

Israel.

 

[Dubious]

UAE/SA vs. Iran.

UAE/SA vs. Qatar.

Turkey vs. Egypt

Turkey with some tension with UAE.

I won't touch Syria. (super convoluted)

I won't mention Yemen as well.

These are just a brief list that comes to mind.

These are Muslim vs Muslims...

Your point was:

any "muslim" majority nation taking as friends non-muslim majority nations against another muslim majority nation.

I can see it aches you to state other stuff

Its not a coincidence that Trump's first foreign visit was to SA.

Kushner is Netanyahoo's in to the WH and thus American policy.

This is all implementation of Israeli security needs.

Muslims will be muslims and focus on the short term and personal interests.

And Arabs will be Arabs and fight amognst each other and then make up and fight again.

Israel is the coolest calmest customer in the middle east and has the US in her hand.

While we muslims squabble with each other, there is ONLY ONE winner in any scenario that leads to escalation.

Israel.

You seem to only put SA with America as the ONLY Muslim/non-Muslim alliance...Either you are ignorant or purposefully narrowing the "examples"

 

[Avicenna]

These are Muslim vs Muslims...

Your point was:



I can see it aches you to state other stuff


You seem to only put SA with America as the ONLY Muslim/non-Muslim alliance...Either you are ignorant or purposefully narrowing the "examples"

I'm neither ignorant nor puporselfully narrowing down any examples.

Please let me know what supposedly aches me to state?

I really don't follow you here.

 

[Dubious]

Please let me know what supposedly aches me to state?

I dont know...I was just pointing it out based on your post alone!

 

[Numerous]

It's Ramadan guys.

Why not take some time to reflect on what our deen says about these topics. i.e. Muslim unity.

That being said, at face value, how can you ever reconcile with good conscience any "muslim" majority nation taking as friends non-muslim majority nations against another muslim majority nation.

SA/UAE working with the US against Iran is indefensible.

Reflect on whats happening my brothers.

The ONLY winner in all this is Israel.

Iran works with Russia + alawites against sunni Muslims.

Iran worked with USA against Afghanistan (2001 war)

Iran worked with India against Pakistan.

The list goes on and on...

 

[The SC]

The same proposal was renewed 2 days ago through the Iraqi Ambassador during the 3 summits of Makkah.. No answer yet.. which Iran takes as positive up till now, because it understands that the proposal needs to be studied in its primary phase then details should come at a later stage.. the new proposal indicated that the dialogue could start through Iraq..