No talks with India until it accepts Kashmir as dispute: Gilani

[imadul]

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/reas...winning-these-particular-types-of-war.446398/

You love yourself too much!

Not sure what is your religion, but Muslims ruled the world more or less till early 18th century. All ended with the defeat of Usmani Turks after WWI and Fall of Moghul Empire in India but slowly Muslims have regained freedom from all imperial powers in all colonial lands by first half of 20th century. Last was liberation of Algiers from France.

Suffice to say, The Last Messenger foretold, "You will invade Jazira (Hijaz/Arabia) and Allah will grant it to you. You will invade Persia and Allah will grant it to you. You will invade Byzantium and Allah will grant it to you".

The Messenger said, a group of you will invade India and bring their princes in chains and then they will meet Jesus Christ in Damascus.

All happened within 10-12 years after the passing of the Messenger. Conquest of India remains. This is not about invasion of Ghaznavi's and Ghauri's and Sultanate of Dehli, this is yet to happen.
It is similar to the conquest of Constantinople which was conquered in 1453 by Turks. Messenger foretold the city of Caesar (Constantinople) will be opened first and then Romiyah.

Cheers.

Mr Gilani will die without realizing his dream.

Who is denying he will live forever.
But India's swollen dreams are also not forever. In fact they will end in not so distant future. You will see!!

 

[Lotus_stalk]

No power on earth can separate Kashmir from India. Why ? How ? Let's analyze...

First Kashmir insurgency is a problem of only 3.5 districts, Indian forces are too powerful and determined. J& K also includes Hindu majority Jammu region and Buddhist majority Ladakh region. The muslim majority area is wedged between Jammu and Ladakh, So it can be easily defended by India. Only Kashmir valley is densely populated, the surrounding regions are so sparely populated for any effective uprising. Even if people in Kashmir valley rise up to each single person, the disruption would be only local. The sparsely populated surrounding regions will be easily in Indian hands.

The UN resolution is a suggestion not an order. India is a huge market and has a huge influence. So only few countries would want bad relations with India by interfering with in Kashmir. Kashmir is too small and Indian market is too huge.

Only OIC would even think of daring to try. Which India should should deal with punitive economic tactics. China uses such tactics when someone tries to bring up Tibet. India should switch crude oil imports to Russia, venuzela etc and stop their products from entering Indian market. Switching crude source between Saudi and Iran is enough.

Then the only way Kashmir can be lost from India is outside force. Pakistan tried by fighting 4 wars but failed to even get an inch. And India is also a nuclear power, with huge army. Kargil was the last ditch effort.

Even if Pakistan takes help of OIC militarily, highly unlikely , Indian nuclear missiles would make it impossible. India buys 120 billion dollars worth of crude oil. India is determined to spend all military resources to defend Kashmir.
So far only strange people like Erdogan have even dared tried to suggest mediation. After we responded by sending diplomats to Cyprus and Armenia, pain of which was visible on his face and posture. Bravery is just a kind word for stupidity.

India can also ask USA or Russia to veto any new UN resolution. That closes the UN approach.

In the words of Sushma swaraj " Kashmir will be part of India till the end of Time."

 

[imadul]

No power on earth can separate Kashmir from India. Why ? How ? Let's analyze...

First Kashmir insurgency is a problem of only 3.5 districts, Indian forces are too powerful and determined. J& K also includes Hindu majority Jammu region and Buddhist majority Ladakh region. The muslim majority area is wedged between Jammu and Ladakh, So it can be easily defended by India. Only Kashmir valley is densely populated, the surrounding regions are so sparely populated for any effective uprising. Even if people in Kashmir valley rise up to each single person, the disruption would be only local. The sparsely populated surrounding regions will be easily in Indian hands.

The UN resolution is a suggestion not an order. India is a huge market and has a huge influence. So only few countries would want bad relations with India by interfering with in Kashmir. Kashmir is too small and Indian market is too huge.

Only OIC would even think of daring to try. Which India should should deal with punitive economic tactics. China uses such tactics when someone tries to bring up Tibet. India should switch crude oil imports to Russia, venuzela etc and stop their products from entering Indian market. Switching crude source between Saudi and Iran is enough.

Then the only way Kashmir can be lost from India is outside force. Pakistan tried by fighting 4 wars but failed to even get an inch. And India is also a nuclear power, with huge army. Kargil was the last ditch effort.

Even if Pakistan takes help of OIC militarily, highly unlikely , Indian nuclear missiles would make it impossible. India buys 120 billion dollars worth of crude oil. India is determined to spend all military resources to defend Kashmir.
So far only strange people like Erdogan have even dared tried to suggest mediation. After we responded by sending diplomats to Cyprus and Armenia, pain of which was visible on his face and posture. Bravery is just a kind word for stupidity.

India can also ask USA or Russia to veto any new UN resolution. That closes the UN approach.

In the words of Sushma swaraj " Kashmir will be part of India till the end of Time."

Dream On! Uprising on you, but swollen heads intoxicated by 3 decades of relative progress and mahasbhai jan singh baravado cant see writing on wall.
You will leave Kashmir.

 

[Lotus_stalk]

50 % of Pakistan children are stunted , compared to 30 % in India, which is falling fast. There are more malnutritioned people in Pakistan than in India or Bangladesh. This is because 56 % of India is arable land while only 26% of Pakistan is arable. Each Indian has 10% more arable land than Pakistani. India is larger and more more fertile. This is the God given advantage Indians have over Pakistanis.

Average PAksitani is more stunted, more malnutritioned and less educated compared to Indians. Each Indian has physical and mental advantage over Pakistan. And numerically Indians are 8 times of Pakistan.

Considering the numerical, physical, metal advantage that Indians have over Pakistani, Pakistan will never be able to get Kashmir militarily from India.

Dream On! Uprising on you, but swollen heads intoxicated by 3 decades of relative progress and mahasbhai jan singh baravado cant see writing on wall.
You will leave Kashmir.

Analysis of Air marshall Abid Rao...

jai singh didnt have a game changer like nuclear weapons western training. he was backward regional king . current hindus have been mutated by British influence. not attacker will ever have the relative historical advantage against India.

 

[imadul]

50 % of Pakistan children are stunted , compared to 30 % in India, which is falling fast. There are more malnutritioned people in Pakistan than in India or Bangladesh. This is because 56 % of India is arable land while only 26% of Pakistan is arable. Each Indian has 10% more arable land than Pakistani. India is larger and more more fertile. This is the God given advantage Indians have over Pakistanis.

Average PAksitani is more stunted, more malnutritioned and less educated compared to Indians. Each Indian has physical and mental advantage over Pakistan. And numerically Indians are 8 times of Pakistan.

Considering the numerical, physical, metal advantage that Indians have over Pakistani, Pakistan will never be able to get Kashmir militarily from India.


Analysis of Air marshall Abid Rao...

jai singh didnt have a game changer like nuclear weapons western training. he was backward regional king . current hindus have been mutated by British influence. not attacker will ever have the relative historical advantage against India.

Just a sample of your habitual doctoring and pathological lying...

iii. Madhya Pradesh: 2015 data reveals that Madhya Pradesh has India's highest number of malnourished children - 74.1% of them under 6 suffer from anaemia, and 60% have to deal with malnutrition.
https://www.savethechildren.in/articles/malnutrition-in-india-statistics-state-wise

The great shining india, with dehli, Bombay, the rape capitals of the globe.

 

[Super Falcon]

Very good aggressive stance pakistan should also do the same with india

 

[Hulk]

Hurriyat leader Nayeem Khan to Hizbul founder Ahsan Dar:

If I expose @SA_Geelani Pandora's Box in Kashmir, nobody will attend his funeral.

 

[ashok321]

NIA raids: Separatists warn of 'dire consequences'

 

[bhimram]

separatists warn? Bhag Jihadi bhag is the new slogan

 

[kasper95]

NIA raids: Separatists warn of 'dire consequences'

What ,they want the people to be on street and take dnada from police and they can't even take a raid sitting at home .

 

[Post Colonnial]

obviously this crook is signalling he wants some money. His son in law, who settled down in Delhi probably is demanding a car; and Gilani knows to get money for it from across the border

 

[AbdullahKamal]

People of Kashmir should be provided with their rights

 

[MultaniGuy]

No power on earth can separate Kashmir from India. Why ? How ? Let's analyze...

First Kashmir insurgency is a problem of only 3.5 districts, Indian forces are too powerful and determined. J& K also includes Hindu majority Jammu region and Buddhist majority Ladakh region. The muslim majority area is wedged between Jammu and Ladakh, So it can be easily defended by India. Only Kashmir valley is densely populated, the surrounding regions are so sparely populated for any effective uprising. Even if people in Kashmir valley rise up to each single person, the disruption would be only local. The sparsely populated surrounding regions will be easily in Indian hands.

The UN resolution is a suggestion not an order. India is a huge market and has a huge influence. So only few countries would want bad relations with India by interfering with in Kashmir. Kashmir is too small and Indian market is too huge.

Only OIC would even think of daring to try. Which India should should deal with punitive economic tactics. China uses such tactics when someone tries to bring up Tibet. India should switch crude oil imports to Russia, venuzela etc and stop their products from entering Indian market. Switching crude source between Saudi and Iran is enough.

Then the only way Kashmir can be lost from India is outside force. Pakistan tried by fighting 4 wars but failed to even get an inch. And India is also a nuclear power, with huge army. Kargil was the last ditch effort.

Even if Pakistan takes help of OIC militarily, highly unlikely , Indian nuclear missiles would make it impossible. India buys 120 billion dollars worth of crude oil. India is determined to spend all military resources to defend Kashmir.
So far only strange people like Erdogan have even dared tried to suggest mediation. After we responded by sending diplomats to Cyprus and Armenia, pain of which was visible on his face and posture. Bravery is just a kind word for stupidity.

India can also ask USA or Russia to veto any new UN resolution. That closes the UN approach.

In the words of Sushma swaraj " Kashmir will be part of India till the end of Time."

Ha, as if USA or Russia would listen to India for a diplomatic victory in the UNSC.

 

[GodToons]

Wait for few days Mr Gilani, you will be ceased to exist. Your funding is drying post hawala dealer raids.

Just wait before your cadres eliminate you for more money.

 

[saba shahid]

Works just fine for us. We got all the time in the world. The race against time is for you old man...

Dude India is already a big country why still holding a part which is so little in size and just because of that part everyone is fighting why cant you just let it go when people there dont even want to stay with India?