Zero_wing
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 4,296
- Reaction score
- -2
I don't understand your nonsense. Get someone with a brain to represent you and talk to me.
Isa ka pa oh my god
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't understand your nonsense. Get someone with a brain to represent you and talk to me.
@Zero_wing and @rott banned from the thread for constant trolling and insults
kas sa bu ra du di da da.Isa ka pa oh my god
Did you even read this?
5. The Parties undertake to exercise self-restraint in the conduct of activities that would complicate or escalate disputes and affect peace and stability including, among others, refraining from action of inhabiting on the presently uninhabited islands, reefs, shoals, cays, and other features and to handle their differences in a constructive manner.
That is the reason why we never build any fake islands after 2002, yet...
apparently your island building already violated this since your government said those artificial islands built on top of reefs are for civilian and military purposes; I put emphasis on the word "civilian" because it means people will inhabit those fake islands.
First its non binding agreement the conduct of parties in the West Philippine sea so its not a treaty otherwise you people and you people were first one to violate it again non binding meaning it's more of a promise not to do anything just the way you people like it no consequents and its agreement not a treaty stupid because it's non binding unlike treaties which are binding agreements between nations this a pledge by all parties not to do anything else besides what has already been done plus to talk it over bilaterally second china was constantly ask by the Philippines since 1995 but they continue to repeat that they have complete sovereignty over the area and nothing should be discussed even though they want discussion over the area like spoiled child saying this mine all non are yours all the time since 1995 in fact you fools only agree the conduct of parties because its non binding so any violations has no consequent. So again how can we talk when you fail to even acknowledge the other party and not even willing to discuss the matter? we indulge your country's arrogance for along time it's good we are following up arbitration case even an arrogant country like your can not risk being international deviant for ignoring international conventions and treaties once the ruling as been pass i guess bilateral talks means different in china.
I would like to remind people that the sovereignty over the SCS is enshrined in both PRC and ROC (local government) Constitutions. Hence, the sovereignty issue is above politics; it is a national mandate that rests on historic rights.
ROC claimed nine dashed line just in 1947. When Paracel and Spratly is first, under official administration of Vietnam from long time ago, dated back to 17th century.
can you tell me when China discovered the south sea as you call it?That's the official claim, my friend. That official claim rests on a wealth of historical (diplomatic) documents and evidence to unquestionably prove that China is the first to discover and economically exploit the areas in the SCS.
The difference is that the 'U-shaped line' has been presented to the newly established international regime, because, it was a new start for a new world order.
That's the official claim, my friend. That official claim rests on a wealth of historical (diplomatic) documents and evidence to unquestionably prove that China is the first to discover and economically exploit the areas in the SCS.
The difference is that the 'U-shaped line' has been presented to the newly established international regime, because, it was a new start for a new world order.
Apply your logic Maclo Polo has discovered China, and is there China is territory of Italian ?
Based on your statement below, China was a no man land before discovered by Marco Polo?
Vietnamese fishermen discovered the Islands first in the world, because East Sea of Vietnam is in front of our door. Pls don't say about "discover" here. Apply your logic Maclo Polo has discovered China, and is there China is territory of Italian ?
What does this new established international regime (ROC-KMT) mean ? Chinese CPC had kicked out KMT regime from mainland China, this regime was clown of USA in WW II, claim of ROC is rejected by voting in San Francisco conference in 1951 for the Treaty with Japan after WW II.
Some inhabited reefs and rocks vs. a continent-sized country, my friend. In 2010 I discovered NY for the first time in my life as a student. But I still wait for the Dutch settlers to issue my land deed.
International regime, that is, the UN system. And China's government of the time did not lose time to submit there China's historic claims. This does not mean that China never claimed the islands before, in fact, it just owned and exploited the areas. China just reinforced its historic ownership with the official submission to the UN.