What's new

No country in the Western camp has entered the ranks of developed countries through normal means

UK and later France forced China Qing gov to share the previliges obtained by Americians,and they made it.

The dictatorship that is properly used can maximize the power of a country and its people.

Well that's because they saw something we had done. It's not like we later added their names to our treaty because we wanted to share something.

I don't think you realize that back then there was no concept of a European Union or NATO.
 
.
Especially after the "US-Spain war", the US invasion of China was too late. In the face of China, the United States particularly strongly proposed the "open door" policy, requiring all countries to enjoy the same special rights in China.

Well that's because they saw something we had done. It's not like we later added their names to our treaty because we wanted to share something.
Especially after the "US-Spain war", the US invasion of China was too late. In the face of China, the United States particularly strongly proposed the "open door" policy, requiring all countries to enjoy the same special rights in China.

Well that's because they saw something we had done. It's not like we later added their names to our treaty because we wanted to share something.
Therefore, various Western imperialist countries demanded that China abide by the so-called MFN status, the privilege of China ceded to ont country, and other countries can be integrated automatically. In addition to two special cases, after the First World War, the Chinese Beiyang government cancelled various privileges (including renting land, etc.) of Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire in China.

Well that's because they saw something we had done. It's not like we later added their names to our treaty because we wanted to share something.

I don't think you realize that back then there was no concept of a European Union or NATO.
There is no relationship with the European Union. The United Kingdom and France stipulate that if China gives Russia, Japan or other countries the privilege, Britain and France also enjoy this kind of privilege.
 
.
Especially after the "US-Spain war", the US invasion of China was too late. In the face of China, the United States particularly strongly proposed the "open door" policy, requiring all countries to enjoy the same special rights in China.

The Spanish-American War was in 1898 and by then Europe was already "developed".
Listen I'm sorry China got shafted by treaties/wars but that really didn't make or break Europe or the US becoming "developed". The invention of the smart phone really didn't have much to do with the Iraq War or some treaty with Venezuela. It just happened around the same time.
 
.
This is actually specified in a certain treaty. The Chinese is called: "一体均沾"

The Spanish-American War was in 1898 and by then Europe was already "developed".
Listen I'm sorry China got shafted by treaties/wars but that really didn't make or break Europe or the US becoming "developed".
Therefore, i said:Capitalism or the so called democracy or freedom never worked and never helped any country enter developed status, former empires like UK, France and US, Japan, realized their developed country status through firstly invasion and colonization which means stealing the wealth of other countries to make themselves rich and when you become rich, you start to wonder what else you can do,which means later the innovation and high techs company,

You forgot the name of China-UK's first war called "Opium War", in order to force the sale of drugs and opium to China to make money!

The Spanish-American War was in 1898 and by then Europe was already "developed".
Listen I'm sorry China got shafted by treaties/wars but that really didn't make or break Europe or the US becoming "developed". The invention of the smart phone really didn't have much to do with the Iraq War or some treaty with Venezuela. It just happened around the same time.
After World War II, the era of aggression and colonial rule was over.
Only through the "dictatorship" and "economic development priority" policies can become developed countries, others do not work at all, no matter how democratic and free you are.

You said these things here today because the United States is a developed country. You have money to deal with many problems. The money that your family spends on pets every year, or the food that your family wastes every year, can fill the belly of many families in Africa. .
 
.
This is actually specified in a certain treaty. The Chinese is called: "一体均沾"


Therefore, i said:Capitalism or the so called democracy or freedom never worked and never helped any country enter developed status, former empires like UK, France and US, Japan, realized their developed country status through firstly invasion and colonization which means stealing the wealth of other countries to make themselves rich and when you become rich, you start to wonder what else you can do,which means later the innovation and high techs company,

I think capitalism created most of the inventions you see today. Certainly a desire to make money by starting your own company and bringing your idea to market with an expected financial gain is quite an incentive. As opposed to everybody working in some government owned enterprise and waiting for the clock to hit a certain hour so you can go home.
 
.
In 1864, the United States was still a slave country. Before 1925, women in the United States did not have the right to vote!

I think capitalism created most of the inventions you see today. Certainly a desire to make money by starting your own company and bringing your idea to market with an expected financial gain is quite an incentive. As opposed to everybody working in some government owned enterprise and waiting for the clock to hit a certain hour so you can go home.
No, it is the intellectual property protection system that has created today’s technological prosperity. However, your Americans do not respect Huawei's intellectual property rights so much.

Because you are afraid of competition.
 
. .
Capitalism cannot avoid the economic crisis because of its own defects. The US stock market economic crisis in 1929 and the US financial tsunami in 2008. In fact, the current US system is not a capitalist system, but a private system strictly regulated by the government.

The advantage of state-owned enterprises is that railways and roads can be established in remote areas rather than being criticized. If the system is based on the absolute capitalist system, Tibet should not build railways at all. Even highways should not be built. Because it is not economical, that is why US has no high spped railways even in California,no need and really not economical.


State-owned enterprises also have many drawbacks. Even in China, it is accused

China is respected for its private high-tech enterprise such as Huawei, as well as Alibaba, Tencent, Haier, Hisense, Gree and so on.

What does this have to do with the US becoming a developed country? You are going on a tangent.
By oppressing black slaves, the United States gained the accumulation of primitive capital that was impossible for others.

Hiring 100 industrial workers and buying 100 black slaves who can have children is not economically comparable.

Just like building a company, getting raw materials for free and getting raw materials at market prices, there is no way to compete fairly.
Aggression and colonization of other countries can freely access resources and markets (US British products are sold to colonies, tariffs are basically negligible)
In 1842, the Sino-British Treaty of Nanjing, the United Kingdom required the Chinese government to obtain British consent on tariffs.
Sounds similar to Trump's unequal treaty? No?
 
Last edited:
.
Capitalism cannot avoid the economic crisis because of its own defects. The US stock market economic crisis in 1929 and the US financial tsunami in 2008. In fact, the current US system is not a capitalist system, but a private system strictly regulated by the government.

The advantage of state-owned enterprises is that railways and roads can be established in remote areas rather than being criticized. If the system is based on the absolute capitalist system, Tibet should not build railways at all. Even highways should not be built. Because there is not economical, that is why US has no highways ,no need not ecnomical.


State-owned enterprises also have many drawbacks. Even in China, it is accused

China is respected for its private high-tech enterprise such as Huawei, as well as Alibaba, Tencent, Haier, Hisense, Gree and so on.


By oppressing black slaves, the United States gained the accumulation of primitive capital that was impossible for others.

Hiring 100 industrial workers and buying 100 black slaves who can have children is not economically comparable.

Slavery had pretty much been abolished by 1820 in Europe and that didn't seem to hinder their ability to become developed. I think you are desperately grasping at straws trying to rationalize things.
 
.
Slavery had pretty much been abolished by 1820 in Europe and that didn't seem to hinder their ability to become developed. I think you are desperately grasping at straws trying to rationalize things.
In 1833, the British formally abolished slavery. In 1947, Britain finally gave up its plundering of India and Pakistan.
If not, the British East India Company should never exist.

The current world is: the aggressors do not recognize their aggression against other countries. Only the be invaded have a deep memory. Why is China taking a highly stringent measure against drug crimes? because of the compulsory legalization of drugs imposed by Western countries led by the United Kingdom!While the United Kingdom, France and the United States prohibit the drug trade in their own country at that time.


The British Queen believes that there is nothing wrong when sharing the wealth pirates have robbed and legalized them.


You are an American who naturally does not recognize the plundering of Western countries represented by the UK and United States as a way of primitive accumulation of capital.

US military shipped 50 tons of gold from Syria overnight to its own soil


https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/us-m...t-to-its-own-soil.605237/page-2#post-11242128
 
Last edited:
.
I agree, anyway i'm glad the evil western europeans and their white anglosaxon masters are declining very fast. They are the cancer of humanity.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom