Bratva
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 13,832
- Reaction score
- 67
- Country
- Location
[quote="mafiya, post: 5557974, member: 28512" ]Babur doesnt have a IIR seeker to begin with and lot of inaccuracies in article which is full of BS. Hence Article credibility flops.
Prasun K sengupta is a delusional who should be admitted into mental institutional and should see some psychologist
Well I was naive back then. Now I'm matured
Ok ... thanks for accepting that you were naïve last time you talked about possible contribution from tomahawk towards development of Babur .
You claim to have matured now ...but I am not sure about that yet Lol .
It seems there are lot of Pakistanis who believe that tomahawk may have contributed to Babur
e.g
@Arsalan wrote on June 7, 2012 in reply to your own post
" the Tomahawk contribution is not filed with proofs but this is a known fact that some US missile did fell in Pakistani space (6 i remember) and were recovered by Pakistan Army but when returned to US. this is from where the controversy start as some sources claim that all missiles were not returned and some were kept for study, a study that might well have formed the base of Babur missile. the design and the guidance characteristics seem to be the same. Babur do resembles Tomahawk in look as well. So there is a possibility that we might have got some useful information from those missile as well but this is also true that NESCOM and its subsidiaries have invested both time and money heavily in this product and own most of the research work done for babur! "
Lol even the TEL for babur is Chinese reverse-engineered variants of the Russian MAZ-543TLM vehicle !
and so does it's engine ....as accounted in the article I posted
Development of Babur is a truly multinational endeavor with Ukraine, Russia , Iran, China, Turkey ...to be thanked for same .[/quote]
Personal opinions aside, Nirbhay look similar to tomahawk and babur, does it mean Nirbhay is based on Tomahawk and babur??? Do you know how delusional you look even in your own post by basing your opinion on mere hearsay and personal opinions.
I proved the inconsistencies in artice. Prove it or else your childish claims are laughable and you look more delusional by believing persuna.
Last edited: