What's new

Nirbhay Cruise Missile test failed.

With the maiden test-firing yesterday of the indigenously-developed,
1,200km-range subsonic Nirbhay (Fearless) nuclear-armed cruise missile
(which will eventually be available in both air-launched and submarine-launched
versions), India took the first significant baby-steps toward fielding what will
eventually—by 2017--become a family of multi-role subsonic cruise missiles
available to both the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the Indian Navy (IN). The
maiden test-firing was conducted at 11.50am and what followed was a flawless
liftoff, with its first-stage solid-rocket booster separating from the missile-body
after attaining a height of 500 metres at a distance of 1.5km away from the
launch-point. Thereafter, the missile’s sustainer powerplant, a turbofan,
successfully came on-line and took the missile out to an altitude of 4km while
cruising at Mach 0.7. However, some 10 minutes after liftoff, after the missile
had travelled a distance of 200km and cruising at an altitude of 4km along a
southwesterly flight-path skirting India’s eastern seaboard coastline, a deviation
from its pre-programmed flight trajectory was observed due to a suspected
navigational waypoint pre-programming error, following which it was decided
by mission controllers located at the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at
Chandipur-on-Sea to abort the flight-test to ensure coastal safety by cutting
off the missile’s engine power, which led to the missile safely gliding down
and crashing at the coastline of Odisha’s Jagatsinghpur district. This should not
be surprising at all, since this has been a global norm in the history of long-range
cruise missile R & D. For instance, the maiden flight-test of Pakistan’s 800km-range
Hatf–VII (Babur) could fly out to only a distance of 17km on August 12, 2005,
while its second test-firing saw the Babur attain a range of only 22km on March 22,
2007.

Despite this temporary setback, a number of mission objectives were achieved
from this maiden test-launch of Nirbhay. Firstly, the robustness of the missile’s
airframe and that of its two-stage propulsion system was proven beyond doubt,
as was the reliability of the inertial navigation system and flight-control system.
Secondly, this was the first time in the history of the MoD-owned Defence Research
& Development Organisation (DRDO) that a real-time, combined RF/optronic
flight trajectory-cum missile health tracking system was successfully employed
for the Nirbhay's maiden cruise flight. This was done by equipping an IAF Su-30MKI
chase-aircraft (out from Kalaikunda AFS) with a centreline pod containing
tele-command guidance avionics (designed and developed by the Defence
Avionics Research Establishment) that was responsible for receiving health-monitoring
inputs from the Nirbhay’s specially configured on-board flight management
avionics (these being located in the forward-mounted bulkheads designed for
housing the digital terrain profile matching sensor and the warhead), and also
for relaying flight termination commands in case of mission abort. In addition,
the Su-30MKI also carried a FLIR sensor-equipped Litening-2 LDP for real-time
visual tracking and monitoring of the Nirbhay’s cruise flight.

There are still nine more planned flight-tests of the Nirbhay through to 2017. The
first two are meant for validating the robustness of the missile’s airframe and that
of its two-stage propulsion system (and hence are not equipped with digital terrain
profile matching sensor and warheads. The next two, also to be conducted from
ITR, will seek to validate the Nirbhay’s flight management system, inclusive of the
digital terrain profile matching sensor (an X-band SAR). The following two will
involve the fully integrated missile being test-fired (one over land & one over the
sea) from a Su-30MKI, which will be followed by two SLCM versions being test-fired
(one over land and one over the sea) from a submerged SSBN, the S-2/Arihant.
The final two test-firings will involve fully integrated Nirbhays armed with live
conventional warheads, with one being launched from a Su-30MKI and the other
from the S-2/Arihant.

The Nirbhay’s nuclear warhead-armed ALCM version (minus the solid-rocket booster)
will be qualified for use by 20 specially customised Su-30MKIs, while the nuclear
warhead-armed SLCM variant (incorporating the solid-rocket booster) will go on
board the S-2, S-3 and S-4 SSBNs. The air-launched and nuclear-armed Nirbhay
will have a length of 6 metres, diameter of 0.55 metres, wingspan of 2.7 metres,
launch mass of 1,200kg, cruise speed of Mach 0.7, and a 250kg warhead-section.
Its cruising altitude over water will be 10 metres (33 feet), while its cruising altitude
over land will be 30 metres (98 feet). The MoD-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd’s
(HAL) Bengaluru-based Engine Test Bed Research & Development Centre (ETBRDC)
has developed a turbofan for powering all members of the Nirbhay cruise missile
family. A hybrid inertial navigation system using a ring-laser gyro (RINS) coupled
with a GPS receiver and a digital radar altimeter (all developed by the DRDO’s
Research centre Imarat, or RCI, and integrated jointly by the Advanced Systems
Laboratory, or ASL, and the Aeronautical Development Establishment, or ADE) will
provide a CEP of 20 metres. All on-board avionics, inclusive of the ones mentioned
above, plus the mission computer and missile interface unit, have been developed
as spinoffs from the BrahMos-1 supersonic multi-role cruise missile’s R & D cycle,
which lasted between 1998 and 2005.


While the ASQRs and NSQRs for the nuclear-armed Nirbhay were drafted by 2005,
hands-on R & D work began in only 2007, with all R & D-related activity due for
completion by late 2017. Following the entry into service of the nuclear-armed
Nirbhay’s ALCM and SLCM versions, India’s Strategic Forces Command (SFC) will
have at its disposal four distinct types of highly survivable nuclear warhead delivery
systems that will be optimised for retaliatory nuclear strikes, these being the
4,500km-range SLBM now under development, the 600km-range air-launched
supersonic LRCM that is also now under development (for delivering tactical nuclear
warheads), plus the Nirbhay’s ALCM and SLCM versions, both of which will be able
to deliver boosted-fission nuclear warheads.

A spinoff from this programme is the development of a smaller, conventional
warhead-armed air-launched variant of Nirbhay with a range of 750km, which
will be qualified for launch from combat aircraft like the Su-30MKI, DARIN 3-
standard Jaguar IS as well as Rafale M-MRCA. Presently, there are no plans for
developing submarine-launched or surface-launched versions of this missile,
which will have a length of 6.2 metres, diameter of 0.6 metres, launch mass of
1,350kg, a 400kg HE blast-fragmentation warhead, cruising altitude of 20
metres over land, cruise speed of 240 metres/second, target aspect angle of
+/-180 degrees, and a launch altitude varying between 500 metres and 11,000
metres. The hybrid inertial navigation system will ensure autonomous navigation
via at least 15 waypoints, while for terminal guidance, use will be made of a
noise-immune guidance system that will employ an X-band monopulse SAR radar
similar to the one now being developed for both the BrahMos-1’s Blocks-2/3 and
the Prahaar NLOS-BSM. The conventionally-armed ALCM variant of Nirbhay will
thus be procured in large numbers (exceeding 700) by both the IAF and the IN.

Lastly, here is a revelation for those congenital retards hailing from India’s ‘desi’
print/electronic media who had claimed recently that 36MT turbofans or HAL-built
PTAE-7 turbojets would power the Nirbhay cruise missile. Guess what! The two
slides below from NPO Saturn clearly state that the 36MT turbofan was never meant
to power long-range cruise missiles and neither does it power cruise missiles like
Novator’s 3M14E or 3M54E.

TRISHUL: Maiden Test-Firing Of India’s Nirbhay Strategic Subsonic Cruise Missile A Moderate Success

My net connection is slow, can't upload pics. Go to link for images.

Already posted
http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/239830-drdo-draws-inspiration-aborted-nirbhay-mission-next-launch-8-mont.html
 
.
fail? nah...i thought they said "more than 90% successful"... and "one of the most advanced missiles in the world"..." , sth like that. :lol:

indians:no:



speed is not the only issues of missiles. in fact most world's far more advanced missiles (than brahmos)have beendeliberately designed to be Subsonic.

I know you'll probably dismiss it as an excuse but anyhoo



It depends upon the needs and expertise of the users, coz if speed is not the issue then why are future quasi-cruise platforms like X-51, HSDTV et cetra are hypersonic??????
 
.
So you want to say because Ghauri using old tech it can failed (even test announced successful) even it is operational???
But because Nirbhay is totally new system it cant?

No, Radong 1 was painted as Ghauri, Gauri missile successful in first at first test, experience speaks dude, isn't it @Safriz :omghaha:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
fail? nah...i thought they said "more than 90% successful"... and "one of the most advanced missiles in the world"..." , sth like that. :lol:

indians:no:





speed is not the only issues of missiles. in fact most world's far more advanced missiles (than brahmos)have beendeliberately designed to be Subsonic.

Chinese missiles never failed ?? :cheesy: Perhaps you were too busy in your kitchen when chinese S - 300 failed spectacularly :P
 
.
mmm.jpg



Sonya ji Sonya ji...................Ye kya hua hai:omghaha:
 
. .
No, Radong 1 was painted as Ghauri, Gauri missile successful in first at first test, experience speaks dude, isn't it @Safriz :omghaha:

Even then India failed miserably..
Kh-55 Painted as Nirbhay failed in first flight...
At least Nodong Repainted Ghauri...flew a few successful missions...

India Sux at paintjob :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Engineering is a process of Evolution of theory and to fit in certain criteria. It started fit in to some criteria and then it has been removed. This is Proof of Concept and that is why beta version.

At least is better than copied Chinese Missiles painted with green and have some atrocious attacker's name.
 
.
Even then India failed miserably..
Kh-55 Painted as Nirbhay failed in first flight...
At least Nodong Repainted Ghauri...flew a few successful missions...

India Sux at paintjob :lol:

Prove that its Kh-55.:cheesy:

Even then India failed miserably..
Kh-55 Painted as Nirbhay failed in first flight...
At least Nodong Repainted Ghauri...flew a few successful missions...

India Sux at paintjob :lol:

Prove that its Kh-55.:cheesy:

mmm.jpg



Sonya ji Sonya ji...................Ye kya hua hai:omghaha:

Wrong picture, why you put Manmohan Singh with drone.
 
.
No, Radong 1 was painted as Ghauri, Gauri missile successful in first at first test, experience speaks dude, isn't it @Safriz :omghaha:

The Nodong-1, not the Rodong. The least you can do is get your spellings right and we thank the Koreans for their invaluable contribution to our missile research programs. I don't quite understand the gist of your assertion but I assume you are under the false impression that Pakistan is the only country which copies and adapts missiles to its requirements. Hence I'm going to use this brief post to draw your attention to a constantly overlooked fact in the Indian media. Contrary to the hoohaa in India about the joint co-operation of DRDO and NPO to produce the supersonic Brahmos missile, the Brahmos missile is actually (and quite completely) the P-800 Oniks from Russia.

jahont.jpg


A bit of Indian paint and here you have what you falsely think India made on its own.

F5rOa.jpg


Even the air-launched versions of the missile are painfully similar. Here you have the Russian made missile

6d0c5b90-2760-4163-89fa-3cca962d9242.Large.png


and here the Indian:

BrahMos_MAKS2009.jpg


Although this has been mentioned time and time again it appears that the message rarely hits home in India though. Pakistan copies and India produces. :rofl:

Similarly the Nirbhaya is also based on modified Russian systems that go by the designation Kh-55

IMG_1154-1.jpg


and here the modified Russian missile with an Indian embosse

h.jpg


This exercise was meant to correct your spelling of the Nodong-1, thank our Korean friends and bring you upto par with India's 'indigenous' missile manufacturing capability.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . .
and if Nirbhay had been a joint venture that too had worked :lol:

I have seen Pakistani attempt to construct helicopter without Chinese help, do you want to watch the video of Pakistan's indigenous helicopter. :lol:
 
.
I have seen Pakistani attempt to construct helicopter without Chinese help, do you want to watch the video of Pakistan's indigenous helicopter. :lol:
No i am searching for Indian "Le indigenous: Nirbhay :lol:
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom