Next war with opponents from Sangh pariwar will be different

[ravi gupta]

India claims that it's stocking up on weapons due to China to balance power in the region, and it's nuclear programme was in response to China's as well.

So how is it that China will side with India? And why is OBOR going through Pakistan and not India instead?

China would like to stay neutral and would not like to take side in war,becoz he will be lose billion in buisness from both sides.

 

[Samurai_assassin]

What happen to your armies theat tribe and clan have to fight????

Sorry do not understand your question.

 

[Navin A]

Clearly you haven't watched the video of Kalboshan Yadevs confession. Nowhere is he seen be distressed, threatend or humiliated. He has openly confessed to his operations in Balochestan and Sindh.

Coming out of Pakistan i would not even waste my bandwidth on it! Just sayin

 

[Verve]

China would like to stay neutral and would not like to take side in war,becoz he will be lose billion in buisness from both sides.

China can afford to loose the revenue from India but it can't afford to loose the fuel supply and trade with rest of the globe of which a big chunk will be via CPEC.

And its already clear whose side China is on. It's your wishful thinking that China looks at short term losses of Indian trade only.

Everything revolves around India. Unfortunately it is no longer the jewel in the crown but you lot keep hallucinating.

 

[Samurai_assassin]

You

Coming our of Pakistan i would not even waste my bandwidth on it! Just sayin

so why are you here? Clearly you are wasting your efforts here making yourself into a fool. Either that or you have plenty of time to waste and admire this forum. Go ahead it doesn't make you anti national to appreciate this place. The Indian ministry was happy to admit he his a high ranking military officer. They didn't waste anytime to admit it.

 

[Navin A]

And your only solace is a bigger army with more weapins, and you want to use that as a bases for attack.

There's no equality in war. You will use what you have, we will use what we have.

If you want a conventional war only, then fight with China with similar population. We are a much smaller nation and against a much bigger adversary we will use what we have.

But that'll be too difficult for you to understand.

Turning a bilateral dispute into a trilateral issue is your way of solving the problem? how original? China has plenty of problems of its own on its hand. anyway that is a whole new topic, till date all wars fought and won is through conventional. having said that there is no way you can win in both Conventional or nuclear, hence the rallying... but this dispute can only be solved on a bilateral method. No if's no Buts...

China can afford to loose the revenue from India but it can't afford to loose the fuel supply and trade with rest of the globe of which a big chunk will be via CPEC.

And its already clear whose side China is on. It's your wishful thinking that China looks at short term losses of Indian trade only.

Everything revolves around India. Unfortunately it is no longer the jewel in the crown but you lot keep hallucinating.

When did Pakistan become China's broker, i think you don't have to teach the Chinese on how to conduct trade...

 

[ravi gupta]

Ask the governor of Balochestan who himself is an ethic Baloch. Ask Mr Yadev what was he doing in Balochestan? On a vacation? 60+ officers were killed by militants that answer your question? What relation does India have Balochestan? A land it has no cultural connection with. Ah except Bramdagh has been given asylum in India whilst his own fighters have layed down their arms to work for the country not a corrupt individual begging indian for citizenship.

Even in Kashmir we have elected democratic PDP/BJP government.
Attack on Quetta police academy was done by ISIS/LEJ and they took the responsibility.

 

[Verve]

till date all wars fought and won is through conventional

You need a history lesson!!! The only way USA could contain Japan was by the nuclear weapons. And Japan was a much smaller adversary.

 

[GURU DUTT]

China can afford to loose the revenue from India but it can't afford to loose the fuel supply and trade with rest of the globe of which a big chunk will be via CPEC.

And its already clear whose side China is on. It's your wishful thinking that China looks at short term losses of Indian trade only.

Everything revolves around India. Unfortunately it is no longer the jewel in the crown but you lot keep hallucinating.

care to take up map of OBOR and see where they are building direct rail road and oil pipe line from western china to northern iran and that is where major OIL would come as it will be almost 40% cheaper deu to tranportaion costs as against that coming from CEPC try calculating it

 

[Navin A]

You need a history lesson!!! The only way USA could contain Japan was by the nuclear weapons. And Japan was a much smaller adversary.

Where in my post did i refer to any other country other than Pak v Ind, so i am assuming your level of comprehension is not limited to our discussion?

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Again with the invasion!

We don't want to invade you. We have no interest in killing your soldiers for a war that doesn't make sense.

But terrorists, yes. We won't hold back anything against them.

So if you can make a distinction between your soldiers and terrorists, then we both are on the same side fighting a common monster.

If not, then we can't help it.

First gain the capability to invade Pakistan then we'll discuss everything else.

 

[Verve]

Turning a bilateral dispute into a trilateral issue is your way of solving the problem? how original? China has plenty of problems of its own on its hand. anyway that is a whole new topic, till date all wars fought and won is through conventional. having said that there is no way you can win in both Conventional or nuclear, hence the rallying... but this dispute can only be solved on a bilateral method. No if's no Buts...



When did Pakistan become China's broker, i think you don't have to teach the Chinese on how to conduct trade...

It is you who ia saying that China will so this and that to protect its business in India. So you are claiming that India is so vital to China that it will hurt itself in that process.

If China had considered India to be so vital, OBOR would've gone through India. But China treats India as a hostile nation hence its energy trade route will never be through Hindu India.

Where in my post did i refer to any other country other than Pak v Ind, so i am assuming your level of comprehension is not limited to our discussion?

In full scale wars, all bets are off. That's the nature of warfare. It's foolish to think that all future wars will be conventional only. Surely your strategists don't think that way.

 

[Tshering22]

First gain the capability to invade Pakistan then we'll discuss everything else.

So basically you will continue supporting anti-India elements... is that it?

 

[ravi gupta]

China can afford to loose the revenue from India but it can't afford to loose the fuel supply and trade with rest of the globe of which a big chunk will be via CPEC.

And its already clear whose side China is on. It's your wishful thinking that China looks at short term losses of Indian trade only.

Everything revolves around India. Unfortunately it is no longer the jewel in the crown but you lot keep hallucinating.

Thats y China will interfere to mediate ,if you try to remove your nukes,they know our capability,and they know how will we retaliate.
To stop your maddness and to protect there investment in India and CPEC they will refrain from war.

 

[Navin A]

You
so why are you here? Clearly you are wasting your efforts here making yourself into a fool. Either that or you have plenty of time to waste and admire this forum. Go ahead it doesn't make you anti national to appreciate this place. The Indian ministry was happy to admit he his a high ranking military officer. They didn't waste anytime to admit it.

Again we do not dismiss him as our own, quiet certainly not he is a son of our soil. Just that any evidence produced by Pakistan has no credibility, we all know what length's you would go to doctor evidence. Put him in a international criminal court and testify without his life being in danger, lets see what truth comes out!