Next war with opponents from Sangh pariwar will be different

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

I have already told you we will not invade your land unless you provoke us. Rest is up to you

You are not capable of invading Pakistan. If you were you would have done so after mumbai 2008 and URI last month.

 

[Navin A]

You are not capable of invading Pakistan. If you were you would have done so after mumbai 2008 and URI last month.

Your not capable of striking India or ever getting a anther inch of Kashmir, you will choose your own demise, and history will repeat itself again. There is nothing else for us to do, other than protect our borders and our people!

 

[Verve]

Take it as whatever you want, its a suicide and death wish on part of both countries civilian population, hence why we have a No first use policy in terms of nuclear warfare. In conventional its not limited to first use policy. I think Pakistan's armies top brass, is all to well aware of the immediate death wish they force upon themselves if they strike first. This is the same reason as to why use a proxy war than a full scale confrontation.

This has been reiterated countless times on countless threads, this is where there is no progress made. If you want to keep harping like a broken record than by my Guest!

You guys should recover from the Supremacy disease as fast as you can.

Then only there will be peace.

 

[Samurai_assassin]

Take it as whatever you want, its a suicide and death wish on part of both countries civilian population, hence why we have a No first use policy in terms of nuclear warfare. In conventional its not limited to first use policy. I think Pakistan's armies top brass, is all to well aware of the immediate death wish they force upon themselves if they strike first. This is the same reason as to why use a proxy war than a full scale confrontation.

This has been reiterated countless times on countless threads, this is where there is no progress made. If you want to keep harping like a broken record than by my Guest!

If Pak uses proxies then India also uses them through their bases in Afghanistan.

 

[Navin A]

If Pak uses proxies then India also uses them through their bases in Afghanistan.

SO your admitting to using terrorism as a state policy? from the horse's mouth itself.

 

[Verve]

I have already told you we will not invade your land unless you provoke us. Rest is up to you

Problem is that your proxies have kill 60,000+ of our civilians, and if our proxies do some damage on your side you want to make that a justification for a full scale conventional war.

Wake up please. This is warmong talk by you.

Fight via proxies all you want, but your armies crossing international border will result in a nuclear war and a mutual destruction.

 

[ravi gupta]

Ease of the Bollywood style masala! How exactly will you cross the border with ease? You attack and you will also face full retaliation. Just remember both nations share a land border if you wish to turn Pakistan into Afghanistan then no Indian shall see peace in their life time. War will ravage and hit your nation too. As one of the commentators once said on NDTV 'we cannot underestimate what monster we shall create if we attack Pakistan' buddy what you see in Syria will be far worse for both nations. Don't be naieve to think India will remain unscathed.

You have a point bro,Yes by defeating pakistan we know things will be destabilize and we dont want Syria or Yemen like crises in our neighboorhood. We want stable pakistan rather then destable pakistan.

 

[Samurai_assassin]

SO your admitting to using terrorism as a state policy? from the horse's mouth itself.

Not admitting anything countering your claim of constant accusations agaisnt Pak whilst India remains defient of being the innocent party. Your own Navel officer has made the damming claim of Indian terrorism. Yes a high ranking navel officer now that's from the horses mouth.

 

[Verve]

Not admitting anything countering your claim of constant accusations agaisnt Pak whilst India remains defient of being the innocent party. Your own Navel officer has made the damming claim of Indian terrorism. Yes a high ranking navel officer now that's from the horses mouth.

Plus over 400+ others that have been busted since he started spilling the beans.

 

[ravi gupta]

You should know a few things

1. India will not start a war and enter your territory just like that. It will always be in response to a large scale terrorist/Non State actor attack (whether on civilian or military targets anywhere in India - including Kashmir or mainland India) or and attack/invasion by Pakistani Armed forces
2. As much as possible India will maintain sanctity of the IB or LoC. However even if we do cross the boundary it will not be for holding territory. We have clearly demonstrated it in case of Bangladesh. From India's point of view we dont want burden of additional population who will be clearly hostile to us. At most we will be happy if the current area of Pakistan is split
3. CPEC has effectively made NASR useless. China knows our nuclear doctrine that we will consider a Tactical Nuclear Attack as an invitation for full scale retaliation. China has lot of investment in Pakistan and they wont want it to go up in smoke just because some hot headed pakistani general decided to use NASR. Their satellites can monitor Pakistan and they will know within seconds if NASR is being readied. They will immediately put pressure on Pakistan not to use the missile and on India to pull its troops back. Similar calls will be coming from US, Russia and other western countries. nobody wants Nuclear Armeggadon. If Pakistan is seen readying its missile the whole world will ask Pakistan to stop and for India to withdraw

China will definitely interfere since China has more investment/buisness in India then in Pakistan.

 

[Samurai_assassin]

You have a point bro,Yes by defeating pakistan we know things will be destabilize and we dont want Syria or Yemen like crises in our neighboorhood. We want stable pakistan rather then destable pakistan.

defeating Pakistan? Get more practice in combat operations before you decide a career in comedy. Soft targets im Burma mean nothing. Army aside there are hundreds of tribes and clans ready to school the Indian soldiers.

 

[Navin A]

Not admitting anything countering your claim of constant accusations agaisnt Pak whilst India remains defient of being the innocent party. Your own Navel officer has made the damming claim of Indian terrorism. Yes a high ranking navel officer now that's from the horses mouth.

Now lets view the same situation in inverse when we handed the dossiers of 26/11 and the statement of Kasab or the voice samples. So please what did we get back in return? a comment stating "mere literature"

The same dossiers were provided to the international community, in particular to the countries who lost their own civilians. they uniformly agreed to who is at fault here, same could not be said about Pakistan. Now on what basis should i take your doctored video's of that poor bloke in your custody of any credible value.

 

[Tshering22]

You are not capable of invading Pakistan. If you were you would have done so after mumbai 2008 and URI last month.

Again with the invasion!

We don't want to invade you. We have no interest in killing your soldiers for a war that doesn't make sense.

But terrorists, yes. We won't hold back anything against them.

So if you can make a distinction between your soldiers and terrorists, then we both are on the same side fighting a common monster.

If not, then we can't help it.

 

[Samurai_assassin]

A

Now lets view the same situation in inverse when we handed the dossiers of 26/11 and the statement of Kasab or the voice samples. So please what did we get back in return? a comment stating "mere literature"

The same dossiers were provided to the international community, in particular to the countries who lost their own civilians. they uniformly agreed to who is at fault here, same could not be said about Pakistan. Now on what basis should i take your doctored video's of that poor bloke in your custody of any credible value.

dossier in the Tamil language? Come on bud thought you fellas used English

 

[Verve]

China will defiantly interfere since China has more investment/buisness in India then in Pakistan.

India claims that it's stocking up on weapons due to China to balance power in the region, and it's nuclear programme was in response to China's as well.

So how is it that China will side with India? And why is OBOR going through Pakistan and not India instead?