So wht do u think the good wine selling can bring in to society.I can bet on tht its been banned for many year and i really dont see any problem in tht.
Firstly, you seem not to care about reading earlier posts.
However, selling alcohol (wine is just one type) breeds little good but reduces a lot of other crimes substantially. (I'm sure people can argue about medical benefits of moderate drinking as well).
You don't see any problem is a really funny statement since you don't see the dozens that die from poisonous liquor and the criminal gangs that do the bootlegging.
Refer to this post :-
http://www.defence.pk/forums/curren...s-conspiracy-destroy-youth-7.html#post1005714
According to ur logic let the diseases grow and so we have treatment centers to treat tht diseses ,but y should we allow it on the first place it is the thing we can control it.
Lamest and highly unrelated argument. Pre-emptive care also only reduces the chances of catching diseases. High prices and heavy regulation does the same job.
They are western they can do anything Alcohol is not haram in there relegion but in ours(if ur a Muslim)it is Haram.so Do we really need to keep copying every bullshit Western do .
Firstly, lumping up multi-religious countries is flawed.
Secondly, prohibition in the US, Canada and many other places was due to the result of a religious (and partly feminist) movement. You might want to read about the temperance movement.
Thirdly, various christian denominations support prohibition while most teach about moderation.
Fourthly, many Muslim majority states do not prohibit alcohol keeping in mind sane arguments supporting why such an argument should not be placed. You can search legal drinking age and find the names yourself.
The shopkeeper is also responsible coz he is giving them the oppertunity to get in to a bad habit of smoking .Just tell me if cigerettes are not availble so easily in market then how many people actually can smoke it .i think very small amopunt of people can smke it coz they have to go throught a long process of buying it from the black market.
Prohibition will only increase curiosity amongst teenagers and adults who weren't very casual smokers will continue to do so.
Banning something with very limited negative health consequences (of course moderately) is always irresponsible state attitude.
U know teens here are trying to copy west as u r trying to do.They dont even listen to there parents know and they are living there own life .
Pathetic and hollow argument as usual. Had to come down to the I'm-the-righteous-moralist-and-you're-the-pathetic-amoral person.
So u r trying to say tht by allowing the wine u can actually reduce the corruption by the police right , by my friend u r wrong letting police do the corruption is better the to spoil ur whole society .
Society is not spoiled by legalizing alcohol.
Was our society a spoiled one before 1977? Were the Muslims of Pakistan some sort of lesser Muslims or bad Muslims to have lived in a society without such bans? Was our society a "western", "immoral" and "spoiled" one before 1977?
so we cannot enforce the law then wht benefit GOP gonna get from it .Nothing but in the end they will surely destroy the society.
You read it entirely wrong. You argued it'll be difficult to enforce an age limit with our hands busy with other national problems. Police are already enforcing sale prohibition, hence we can enforce age limits as well. My intention with that argument was to highlight that having hands tied with terrorism is a flawed argument concerning the difficulty in application and enforcement of law.