What's new

New US export controls block China from achieving its semiconductor ambitions

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
New US export controls on technologies for the production of advanced chips and gas turbine engines, which took effect on Monday, have set up an imposing roadblock that prevents China from achieving its semiconductor ambitions, according to analysts.


The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), an agency under the US Department of Commerce, last Friday announced the export controls on grounds of national security. The four restricted technologies are among the items covered by the multilateral 1996 Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies, in which China is not a member.


Three of the four restricted technologies include electronic computer-aided design software, which is used for developing next-generation chips with gate-all-around (GAA) field-effect transistor structure, and two substrates of so-called ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors – gallium oxide and diamond – that operate at much higher voltages, frequencies and temperatures than conventional chip materials like silicon.


While China is not singled out in the latest US export controls, analysts said the restrictions clearly target the world’s second-largest economy.

“The US is targeting the future,” said Shang Manjun, an analyst with Shanghai-based semiconductor consulting firm ICwise. She described the export restriction on software used for designing advanced chips as “a trump card” that Washington has not used before.


The US tech export controls mark an escalation of Washington’s efforts to boost America’s hi-tech advantage over China, just days after US President Joe Biden signed into law the Chips and Science Actthat earmarks nearly US$53 billion in semiconductor manufacturing incentives.

The export ban on gallium oxide and diamond, for example, is a means to prevent use of these materials in chips for military applications, according to the BIS.

The new export restrictions rang alarm bells among Chinese semiconductor market insiders because the domestic chip industry relies on advanced US electronic design automation (EDA) software, such as those supplied to China by Cadence Design Systems, Synopsys and Mentor Graphics. Chinese software providers, like Empyrean Technology, are still trying to catch up on what those US firms provide.

Despite the long shadow cast by the latest US export controls, ICwise analyst Shang said it remains unlikely that US suppliers would immediately cease providing EDA software to Chinese chip design firms.


Semiconductor development in China has not advanced to a level that demands design software for chips with complex GAA transistor structure. Still, such software would be needed once China reaches 3-nanometre process in semiconductor manufacturing, according to a Chinese EDA software company executive, who declined to be identified because he is not allowed to speak to media.

The executive indicated that companies like Empyrean are at least one or two generations behind the major US suppliers.


Samsung Electronics, meanwhile, said in June that it had started initial production of its 3nm process node using GAA transistor architecture. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, the world’s largest contract chip maker, also has GAA on its technology road map for processes below 5nm. US chip giant Intel is likely to start GAA production between 2024 and 2025.

 
Yanks are afraid of competition. Yanks should have nuked China in 1949 when the US had nukes and China didn't.
 
New US export controls on technologies for the production of advanced chips and gas turbine engines, which took effect on Monday, have set up an imposing roadblock that prevents China from achieving its semiconductor ambitions, according to analysts.


The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), an agency under the US Department of Commerce, last Friday announced the export controls on grounds of national security. The four restricted technologies are among the items covered by the multilateral 1996 Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies, in which China is not a member.


Three of the four restricted technologies include electronic computer-aided design software, which is used for developing next-generation chips with gate-all-around (GAA) field-effect transistor structure, and two substrates of so-called ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors – gallium oxide and diamond – that operate at much higher voltages, frequencies and temperatures than conventional chip materials like silicon.


While China is not singled out in the latest US export controls, analysts said the restrictions clearly target the world’s second-largest economy.

“The US is targeting the future,” said Shang Manjun, an analyst with Shanghai-based semiconductor consulting firm ICwise. She described the export restriction on software used for designing advanced chips as “a trump card” that Washington has not used before.


The US tech export controls mark an escalation of Washington’s efforts to boost America’s hi-tech advantage over China, just days after US President Joe Biden signed into law the Chips and Science Actthat earmarks nearly US$53 billion in semiconductor manufacturing incentives.

The export ban on gallium oxide and diamond, for example, is a means to prevent use of these materials in chips for military applications, according to the BIS.

The new export restrictions rang alarm bells among Chinese semiconductor market insiders because the domestic chip industry relies on advanced US electronic design automation (EDA) software, such as those supplied to China by Cadence Design Systems, Synopsys and Mentor Graphics. Chinese software providers, like Empyrean Technology, are still trying to catch up on what those US firms provide.

Despite the long shadow cast by the latest US export controls, ICwise analyst Shang said it remains unlikely that US suppliers would immediately cease providing EDA software to Chinese chip design firms.


Semiconductor development in China has not advanced to a level that demands design software for chips with complex GAA transistor structure. Still, such software would be needed once China reaches 3-nanometre process in semiconductor manufacturing, according to a Chinese EDA software company executive, who declined to be identified because he is not allowed to speak to media.

The executive indicated that companies like Empyrean are at least one or two generations behind the major US suppliers.


Samsung Electronics, meanwhile, said in June that it had started initial production of its 3nm process node using GAA transistor architecture. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, the world’s largest contract chip maker, also has GAA on its technology road map for processes below 5nm. US chip giant Intel is likely to start GAA production between 2024 and 2025.

Sanctioning Beijing on gallium oxide and diamond transistors. Interesting step by the US, people can learn some on this forum.
Overall those sanctions are much smarter than imposing higher tariffs. That will have a bigger impact, much more than Trump tariffs.

A wide comprehensive step would be total ban of semiconductor related activities including banning on sale and trade of machinery, banning all chinese students and scientists to US top universities and cooperations. Probably the next step by Biden administration.
 
banning all chinese students and scientists

Makes no difference. Chinese can go to France and Germany and Britain to study. Yanks science is pretty poor compared to Western European science. Yanks are poor immigrants from Western Europe. America is much colder than Western Europe. Only poor people immigrated to America to start a new life.
 
Sanctioning Beijing on gallium oxide and diamond transistors. Interesting step by the US, people can learn some on this forum.
Overall those sanctions are much smarter than imposing higher tariffs. That will have a bigger impact, much more than Trump tariffs.



this is phucking hilarious. this is like the US is banning rare-earth materials to china.. lol. ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors are stuff that china is pretty good at. yeah, people like you can learn some on this forum. :lol:




ibH5PMK.png


4isEHxB.jpg
 
Last edited:
Makes no difference. Chinese can go to France and Germany and Britain to study. Yanks science is pretty poor compared to Western European science. Yanks are poor immigrants from Western Europe. America is much colder than Western Europe. Only poor people immigrated to the US to start a new life.
Where is the competition to google, Facebook, Microsoft, Tesla and thousands other US companies? If you are migrant and want to excel go to America. Germany, France, England is not the place for.
this is phucking hilarious. this is like the US is banning rare-earth materials to china.. lol. ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors are stuff that china is pretty good at. yeah, people like you can learn some on this forum. :lol:




ibH5PMK.png


4isEHxB.jpg
from the article the US doesn’t ban rare minerals which is nonsense you are right. The ban is on the technology. That doesn’t matter China masters the technology or not. The aim is closing the curtain.
 
Wonder if synopsys cadence et al can kill switch their design platform or just stop upgrades.
 
Where is the competition to google, Facebook, Microsoft, Tesla and thousands other US companies? If you are migrant and want to excel go to America. Germany, France, England is not the place for.

from the article the US doesn’t ban rare minerals which is nonsense you are right. The ban is on the technology. That doesn’t matter China masters the technology or not. The aim is closing the curtain.
Do you think these technologies can prevent China from gradually controlling the semiconductor industry?
 
Do you think these technologies can prevent China from gradually controlling the semiconductor industry?
Without a super featured design platform it takes ages to do even a mid complex chip design. A few PhD candidates in Beijing Uni started a project about 15 years ago but it did not complete. I think atleast one of them joined cadence but I lost touch with him. Depending upon the starting point, it will take several years or even a decade to build a cadence like
 
Without a super featured design platform it takes ages to do even a mid complex chip design. A few PhD candidates in Beijing Uni started a project about 15 years ago but it did not complete. I think atleast one of them joined cadence but I lost touch with him. Depending upon the starting point, it will take several years or even a decade to build a cadence like
Only Indian people will believe what you say. I bet even Americans won't believe this can stop China.

In 2021, China broke through 7nm. Maybe next year, you can see 5nm from China.
 
Lol.. like sanction China which result China producing 7nm chips which Intel and US with all the access of EUV cant even produce it in US homeland.

This is just a masturbation article to give feel good for this anti China gang. Remember US ban China from ISS. Guess what, we still can go ISS but we no need it. Cos we have our Tiangong space station. :enjoy:

Soon there will be a feel good article by some clown claiming China still want go ISS but Tiangong space station is junk. :rofl:
 
Only Indian people will believe what you say. I bet even Americans won't believe this can stop China.

In 2021, China broke through 7nm. Maybe next year, you can see 5nm from China.

Now that you mention it. When can we see the 7nm GPGPU that you guys said was coming? You announced the breakthrough last April and people are expecting Loongson 5000 series to be 7nm, instead it was released as 12nm in July last year.

I mean, when TMSC announced the release of 5nm, it took them 3 months to make 5nm A13 chips, and now they already released A15, the second generation 5nm chips.....
 
Last edited:
Now that you mention it. When can we see the 7nm GPGPU that you guys said was coming? You announced the breakthrough last April and people are expecting Loongson 5000 series to be 7nm, instead it was released as 12nm in July last year.

I mean, when TMSC announced the release of 5nm, it took them 3 months to make 5nm A13 chips, and now they already released A15, the second generation 5nm chips.....
You american can't even mass produced any chips in 7nm and got the cheek to come talk to China?

Currently , only Taiwan, PRC and South Korea are the only place on earth capable of commercialize 7nm chips. Not even US with access of EUV can do it. This just show how backward American when comes to fabricate advance chips. :enjoy:

 
You american can't even mass produced any chips in 7nm and got the cheek to come talk to China?

Currently , only Taiwan, PRC and South Korea are the only place on earth capable of commercialize 7nm chips. Not even US with access of EUV can do it. This just show how backward American when comes to fabricate advance chips. :enjoy:

Are you for real?

It didn't hurt to go look up what fab Intel Raptor Lake Cpu are using? It may surprise you?

Hell, even Alder Lake already used Intel 7

By the way, Intel already had 5nm tech on Intel 4, releasing 2023.....


And as I said, China does not have a 7nm chip, they said it was broken thru back in April 21' but there still aren't any chips using 7nm. Please do show me which 7nm chips China is using??
 
Are you for real?

It didn't hurt to go look up what fab Intel Rartor Lake Cpu are using? It may surprise you?

By the way, Intel already had 5nm tech on Intel 4, releasing 2023.....


And as I said, China does not have a 7nm chip, they said it was broken thru back in April 21' but there still aren't any chips using 7nm. Please do show me which 7nm chips China is using??
Lol...do u know what you show are just study and technique which none are commercialize. If US is so good. Apple and Qualcomm wouldn't be begging Samsung and TSMC to made 3nm and 5nm chips for them.

Don't try misled the readers with your misleading statements. We all know the standard of US chip fabrication
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom