pakdefender
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 5,671
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
One unit is a better soultion as it makes the ground even for all and brings about unity rather than making divisions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As if we haven't suffered through the disintegration of the state after we implemented One Unit to deny enhanced right to a deserving populace.
Recommendations for one unit speak volumes about the archaic, myopic, totalitarian and retrogressive thinking that has led to the failure of the system of governance we have allowed ourselves to fall into.
We have established over the previous few pages, through constructive argument, debate, dissent and counter argument that creation of more provinces is at the heart of a democratic culture and is essential to establishing a more efficient, transparent, financially autonomous and administratively manageable system of governance.
If you have nothing more to do than write one liners which cannot be supported by any logical claim and/or evidence, then such suggestion cannot come into the realm of a constructive debate, rather they derail threads.
PS:- If you're going to take on the mention of this being at the heart of a democratic culture, and mention the ever ready argument of Sharia-Khilafa, then as I said earlier, that will amount to derailing the thread, moving off topic and not contributing anything positive.
One unit is a better soultion as it makes the ground even for all and brings about unity rather than making divisions.
One unit is a better soultion as it makes the ground even for all and brings about unity rather than making divisions.
That is not necessarily true, and the Federal structure in the US is evidence of that.
The US States are also largely autonomous and no one can argue against the strength and unity amongst Americans as a nation.
Regardless of whether we have One Unit or many provinces, unity will come with prosperity, equality and justice for all within the Pakistani Federation.
When people have faith in the system, it does not matter what the system is. In the long run it will be prosperity, the rule of law, and the free movement of peoples within the Federation, to settle in any province they like (as is the case in the US) that will build unity, in more ways than just calling ourselves Pakistanis.
At the moment the reality is that there are underlying ethnic issues and these issues are best addressed by granting a degree of autonomy in administrative affairs, to take away the excuse that the majority (Punjabis) and discriminating against the other groups by virtue of a strong central government.
You see by creating further adminstrative divsions in ( that are by and large targetted at Panjab ) based on perception of other groups that feel they are being discriminated against by the majority (Panjabus) there is every possibility that slogans like 'JAG PANJABI JAG' will find a greater resonance amongst the people of the most populated province of Pakistan since now the Panjabis feel that the ire is only targetted at them , such an outcome wont be good for the country.
We need to stick together.
This concept is politically motivated and these Idiot politicians will regret it later.
No doubt this division will put pakistan back 100 years.
We still fight over dams and gas with just four provinces.
Make more and increase the infightiing a perfect cover to suck money out of the country in the long run.
Zardari, Nawaz do get points for that.
I agree that there will be more issues in that sense - if a dam is built, and the catchment area for the dam lies in two provinces, say Hazara and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, then how is the royalty split or is it split at all?
Why would one province allow its territory to be submerged if it wont get royalty?
These are good issues to discuss.