New Mosque Design for Ayodhya

[CIA Mole]

Lol nothing's gonna be built

 

[bahadur]

Before constructing Ram Temple.. Indian Govt should conduct a 100 feet digging of sight to see if there was a temple or not ...

that has been established , there was mandir remains in the foundation .

Most Muslim organisations in India are already under the control extremist Hindu thinking, under the garb of desh bakhti.

You do not need an imagination to point the obvious, just eyes, even one will do, if you are willing to see the obvious.

Shame on the lot of you. Extremist and terrorism will be the end of you. Wake up before it is too late.

indian muslims are indian first .

Make a mandir out of it. A big Lingam with horns of cow is yours. For Muslims, Allah has made the entire planet their "Sajda-gah" (the place of worship). We are not in need of a temple to offer our prayers.

who is giving you maszid ? it is for indians .

 

[Markandeya]

Wrong

Jinnah desperately tried to convince all Indians that a united India would be a disaster, Jinnah understood the historical baggage and hatred amongst communities

Jinnah understood the need for Partition

Jinnah understood the need for a
Muslim state
A Sikh Khalistan
A xtian state
A Hindu rashtra

But not just one country, MULTIPLE countries made out of India

He understood it was vital for peace in South Asia


it was INDIANS who were stupid, who tried and successfully tried to convince Sikhs, Indian Muslims, xtians of the need of a United India for all


If you wanted a hindutva extremist communal shithole of a state then why lie to Indian Sikhs or Muslims about a united India

now everyone is STUCK

as India turns increasingly hindutva extremist the Indian minorities will.push back as they are doing


india will partition again for ONE REASON that is because Jinnah was RIGHT

you can't trap hundreds of millions in one poisonous communal state

1971 should have fixed this Jinnah theory for good. Jinnah should have sought a Shiaistan, Sunnistan and Ahmadiyastan as well...

Now Hindus have to do this task ....

 

[White and Green with M/S]

recently pakistanis destroyed very old buddhist statue by breaking it in to pieces , it was found while digging a foundation .
we dont believe in taking others places of worship.
we will retake our places of worship taken by force of aurangjeb and other muslim sultans .
we will take two more mandirs back from muslims .kashi and mathura .

There no such thing in Pakistan, you're probably talking about Afghanistan

There are lots of Mandirs in Pakistan many in Karachi Lahore and allover Pakistan but Muslim are not destroying them unlike terrorists Hindus

And aurangzab destroyed many temples because they were rebellion center of his govt

And tell me when you're starting to destroy TAJ MAHAL

 

[AUz]

1971 should have fixed this Jinnah theory for good. Jinnah should have sought a Shiaistan, Sunnistan and Ahmadiyastan as well...

Now Hindus have to do this task ....

The two-nation theory actually proved to be correct especially after 71 war. Bangladesh chose to remain an independent Muslim-majority state instead of rejoining West Bengal, despite having the same ethnicity and receiving help from their co-ethnics during the war.

Why?

Yup, because even Muslim Bengalis saw themselves as a separate nation from Hindu Bengalis aka two-nations based on different religions. Two nation theory has been a resounding success. Divided india, 16% Muslims took away 25% of indian landmass and got Muslim-majority states out of it, and now even Modi/RSS are forced to accept the two-nation theory and are acting barbarically towards Muslim indians---whom they don't see as 'truly' indian since Muslims are a different nation than Hindus even in RSS imagination

Dont worry about us....worry about your failing shith*le of a state where your capital Delhi had Hindu-Muslim riots and now is surrounded by Sikh farmers agitating against your government--all within few months

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Indian heritage was also there in Pakistan Taxila, Budhhist temples, Hindu temples...how many of them are remaining compared to Muslim Indian heritage that still exists in India? ..Stop cherry picking

So what idiot? This same idiotic argument over and over from multiple different accounts this week? Millions of old religious structures were replaced with newer ones during medieval history. You think it didn't happen in UK? Yet you don't see druid societies of Salisbury rampaging around and smashing Christian church built over pagan temples.

This is what Your kind doesn't get. In 1992 a.d., the smashing of a mosque, instigation of communal riots, and murder of the imams' family members are not civilised behavioural patterns.

Why should modern Muslims of India be punished in 1992 for events of a bygone age?

Should modern New Zealanders suffer for colonial crimes against maoris? Not sure you really are interested in that given your history of false flagging around here.

ayodhya is vetican of india no maszid should be built in ayodhya.

litigation started in Akbar's reign , but akbar was afraid of mullas so he could not dare to do justice .later mughals were bigots .

Big words like "litigation". Wow. Did you follow the court case presently? Never mind during Akbar's reign, in modern democratic secular India, you can use mystical powers to summon Ram himself to the dock! You call this legal process? You dumb buffoon of a country called Hindustan.

"Suit 5 lists both Ram and the place it considers to be his janmabhoomi as plaintiffs (as "juridical persons"*), and asks that the entire premises be declared their property.

There was also a third plaintiff: the "next friend" of the first and the second. This position was held by Deoki Nandan Agarwal until his death in 2002.

An article in the Wall Street Journal describes how he "testified both on behalf of Ram and himself", having "worked late into the night for years on the filing"."

Such b.s. unsurprisingly compromises the judicial process because, like, yknow, how can I argue against a God?

 

[khanmubashir]

The design of a mosque and a hospital to be built on a five-acre land in Ayodhya's Dhannipur village allocated by the Supreme Court in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case was unveiled at the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation office in Lucknow.

The Uttar Pradesh State Sunni Central Waqf Board had formed the trust, Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation, to construct the mosque and other utilities on the plot.

Prof SM Akhtar of Jamia Millia Islamia, who joined the programme through video conferencing, displayed the designs of the mosque and the 200-bed hospital that will come up at the site.

A community kitchen and a modern library will also be set up in the complex.


The village chosen for the 'Babri Masjid'
"The design of the mosque has been prepared using modern technology, and it will be egg-shaped without any dome. The two-storeyed mosque will not have any minaret. Solar power will be installed in the mosque, and around 2,000 people will be able to offer 'namaaz' at the same time," he said.

The hospital will provide state-of-art facilities, much needed in the surrounding population, with a focus on the needs of the children who are suffering from malnourishment and expectant mothers, the IICF said in a statement here.

The building structure will also house the trust office and publication house focusing on research and a publication house of Indo Islamic Cultural-Literature Studies.

"The construction work of the mosque was scheduled to begin from January 26, but in this period getting the map approved seems to be difficult, hence the construction is likely to begin from August 15," Athar Husain, secretary of Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation, told reporters.

Asked whether the Uttar Pradesh chief minister will be invited for the foundation laying programme, Hussain said that as per Islamic traditions, no big function is organised while laying the foundation stone of a mosque.

"After the hospital mosque is constructed, prominent people of the country and the state will be invited," he said.

To a question on the name of the proposed mosque, Hussain said, "The mosque will not be named after any king or nawab. Personally, I have suggested that the mosque be named as Dhannipur Masjid."

He also said that the work on the mosque will begin soon. "The mosque will be eco-friendly, and plants from across the world will be planted. The hospital will be a different building, which will a ground floor plus four floors," he said.

Prof Pushpesh Pant, a consultant curator for the archives and museum at the site, said that there is a need for a good museum to showcase the joint accomplishments and struggles of the Hindu and Muslim communities in India.

After a protracted legal tussle, the Supreme Court had on November 9 last year ruled in favour of the construction of a Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya, and directed the Centre to allot an alternative five-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a new mosque at a "prominent" place in the holy town in Uttar Pradesh.

The mosque in Ayodhya was demolished on December 6, 1992 by 'kar sevaks' who claimed that an ancient Ram temple stood at the same site.

Well at least it doesn't have Idols in it

 

[Baby Leone]

According to the SC order - it will be built by the State.

Here is a video rendering -

https://twitter.com/x/status/1340567240849035264

and will be demolished by Hindus again with support of state?

 

[Baby Leone]

will there be idols as well?

 

[bahadur]

But only 1 temple we are destroyed, and how many mosques you destroyed by your Extreme terrorists Hindus in India

we never destroyed any maszid , we just want our places of worship back .
you destroyed our buddhist statues in afghanistan bamian , because butshikani is a good deed in your religion .

 

[gom poa]

the design reassures that Islam doesn't have a history in India

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

the design reassures that Islam doesn't have a history in India

Their Country. Their rules. They can do what they like. Nothing to do with foreigners like us.

 

[bahadur]

the design reassures that Islam doesn't have a history in India

dont forget this is indian islam .

Their Country. Their rules. They can do what they like. Nothing to do with foreigners like us.

very well said
nobody is allowed to interfere in our internal matters .

 

[GHALIB]

There no such thing in Pakistan, you're probably talking about Afghanistan

There are lots of Mandirs in Pakistan many in Karachi Lahore and allover Pakistan but Muslim are not destroying them unlike terrorists Hindus

And aurangzab destroyed many temples because they were rebellion center of his govt

And tell me when you're starting to destroy TAJ MAHAL

don't you live in pakistan ? it is very recent incident , buddha statue was destroyed to pieces .

so if a maszid is rebellion centre you will support its demolition and construction of mandir over it ?
muslims gather in maszids and khutba for destruction of kafirs is always read on every fridays .

 

[gom poa]

dont forget this is indian islam .

"Indian" Islam has a history and you guys don't acknowledge it. thats the issue