What's new

Nepal had offered to join Indian Union in 1947: Sudershan

What did we do??It was the Bhutanese who kicked them out.

You do understand that you are replying to a false flagger, a troll who created an account to post only rubbish on this thread, don't you? :lol:
 
.
You do understand that you are replying to a false flagger, a troll who created an account to post only rubbish on this thread, don't you? :lol:

I am a bit interested in this character.You will never know.
 
.
Why did your BIG BODY China not help Sikkim against Indian opression? Why only Nepal and Bhutan? Was Sikkim not blessed by Bid body China's help?

Sikkim is not settled yet, China has never formally declare that it was part of India, we just want to set trap on India: If India offer other to join India Union, we expect others to be allowed to leave India Union as well such the potential case as Assam, with those UFLA movement...we're watching with interesting eye ;)
 
.
Ohhhh ya ! U know lot abt gorkhas and Nepal. U moron ,fkn retard go to Karachi mental institute to cure ur brain's bug.

after east India company occupied rajasthan they came to us for the job.now shut ur holes off.

Mate . Welcome to PDF.
Plz try posting without personal abuses unless you wanna get banned.
U arw the first nepali I have seen on pdf . you can prolong your stay here by being reasonable and stopping your personal abuses.
Best of luck.
 
.
Sikkim is not settled yet, China has never formally declare that it was part of India, we just want to set trap on India: If India offer other to join India Union, we expect others to be allowed to leave India Union as well such the potential case as Assam, with those UFLA movement...we're watching with interesting eye ;)

Tibet's case is more interesting.

Mansarover is a hindu pilgrimage since vedic times (BC era!!!)... it could have been a part of India... though also Nepal.

In any case, China can have NIL claim over Mansarover. It's an illegal occupation by PLA.

India and China NEVER had a border since historical times. China is NOT a neighbour of India.

Illegal occupation of Tibet by China does NOT make China a neighbour of India.

Anyway, these things are due for resolution in future.
 
.
Wow!! So if we really wanted to take Bhutan into our Indian Union, no country would have the guts to say anything. Check 'Sikkim' :azn:

Really :lol:, it won't take long for Bhutan to join China Union that's why India is begging Bhutan not to file the divorce :rofl:, we China is about to steal India's girlfriend, you better comply to all Bhutan demand or China is just next to it, we certainly have the gut to do something.


With China on its mind, India cozies up to Bhutan - Hindustan Times

Tibet's case is more interesting.

Mansarover is a hindu pilgrimage since vedic times (BC era!!!)... it could have been a part of India... though also Nepal.

In any case, China can have NIL claim over Mansarover. It's an illegal occupation by PLA.

India and China NEVER had a border since historical times. China is NOT a neighbour of India.

Illegal occupation of Tibet by China does NOT make China a neighbour of India.

Anyway, these things are due for resolution in future.

But your gutless Indian gorverment has recognize that Tibet is part of China :lol: We did more than just claim the border with India, we also claim all the water that India is desperately need, try to beg us again to have water treaty??:smokin:

now go crying a river to fill up Brahmaputra :rofl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
There is only an Indo-Tibet border (.. and actually, ITBP i.e. Indo-Tibet Border Police mans that border).

The formal delineation of the Indo-Tibet border needs to wait till the liberation of Tibet and establishment of a proper government in Lhasa which whom we could negotiate.

I do believe that Mansarover will be a part of India, not Tibet as a result of such negotiations.

Off course, all this needs to wait.. till Tibet resolves its own issues with PRC. They don't have a functional government in charge with whom we can initiate negotiations.

Tibet needs to resolve its issues with PRC, first.

We can wait, till then. No hurry.
 
.
Nepal is smart.. they know they have future without India. We should take Nepal by force like we did to Goa. After Nepal we should go after Pakistan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka, and Bhutan to remake the glory of British India.

Nepal has China card ;)


Nepal: The China Card?

There is only an Indo-Tibet border (.. and actually, ITBP i.e. Indo-Tibet Border Police mans that border).

The formal delineation of the Indo-Tibet border needs to wait till the liberation of Tibet and establishment of a proper government in Lhasa which whom we could negotiate.

I do believe that Mansarover will be a part of India, not Tibet as a result of such negotiations.

Off course, all this needs to wait.. till Tibet resolves its own issues with PRC. They don't have a functional government in charge with whom we can initiate negotiations.

Tibet needs to resolve its issues with PRC, first.

We can wait, till then. No hurry.

Indeed no hurry, wait until Ganges and Brahmaputra river are drying up :azn: patient is Indian's vertue. Meanwhile we enjoy to build more dams on Brahmaputra river :lol:
 
.
Indeed no hurry, wait until Ganges and Brahmaputra river are drying up :azn: patient is Indian's vertue. Meanwhile we enjoy to build more dams on Brahmaputra river :lol:

Ganges doesn't flow in Tibet, at all.

Brahmaputra emerges from Tibet, but slopes on India's side.
Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Bangladesh all have great deal of water, anyways.

PRC govt understands this much better than you do; go read about what your own govt says.

An antagonistic India worsens PRC occupation of Tibet even further, even while the current Indian policy is to let Tibet and PRC resolve their issues among themselves.
 
.
Ganges doesn't flow in Tibet, at all.

Brahmaputra emerges from Tibet, but slopes on India's side.
Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Bangladesh all have great deal of water, anyways.

PRC govt understands this much better than you do; go read about what your own govt says.

An antagonistic India worsens PRC occupation of Tibet even further, even while the current Indian policy is to let Tibet and PRC resolve their issues among themselves.

Sure Ganges is not from Tibet but doesn't prevent China to seal all melting ice and underground water at the vincinty of the Ganges head source ;). Needless to say more about Brahmaputral for today :lol:, and you 're very right China is indeed understand much more than me about how to take care of India

Diversion debate in China: moving water from Tibet to Xinjiang | chinadialogue

ganges-web.jpg
[/QUOTE]
 
.
There is no need to include Nepal and Bhutan...they will be just another burden for us.

We will have to spend more on them and get nothing in return.

One Bihar like state is enough.

Correct your views about Bihar...................Bihar is growing @ 11% .........At present this growth is more than the state of Gujarat.............
 
.
Sure Ganges is not from Tibet but doesn't prevent China to seal all melting ice and underground water at the vincinty of the Ganges head source ;).

:laugh: :laugh:

Then don't complain if we block all pollution-free air from all around china to flow into china. :laugh:

Really funny. :laugh:
 
.
If britons weren't there to protect ur ancestors' ***** half of the India was long gone.so praise the British who made today's fat India.:rofl:

Even Indians agree that without the British, the French and Portugese would divide up India. And India today would be many countries like Africa. With various tribes fighting for control of charcoal trade. Maybe there would be an Indian version of Kony with another kony 2012 scam

Tibet's case is more interesting.

Mansarover is a hindu pilgrimage since vedic times (BC era!!!)... it could have been a part of India... though also Nepal.

In any case, China can have NIL claim over Mansarover. It's an illegal occupation by PLA.

India and China NEVER had a border since historical times. China is NOT a neighbour of India.

Illegal occupation of Tibet by China does NOT make China a neighbour of India.

Anyway, these things are due for resolution in future.

How can anyone be neighbor of India in the past if India never existed until 1947?
 
.
:laugh: :laugh:

Then don't complain if we block all pollution-free air from all around china to flow into china. :laugh:

Really funny. :laugh:

Indeed it's funny, if we dump some polluted water and let it flown downward and merge to Ganges head water :azn:, What an advantage to be on the high hill :whistle:
 
.
.
Back
Top Bottom