Nepal constitution: Mind your own business, media tell India

[Maravan]

Pongal?
Are you trying to say Bengal?
Regards

Its Pongal, the festival of tamils which will be celebrated on the first day of the tamil month "thai".

 

[Slav Defence]

Its Pongal, the festival of tamils which will be celebrated on the first day of the tamil month "thai".

yes,my bad.I have taken my ratings back.sorry man!

regards

 

[Josef K]

PETA asking for the ban on animal slaughter too in the courts. Even jaya banned once and repelled the law after the public outrage.

Then how did it get banned? Please explain the mechanism of how the ban came into effect, and that too by order of Supreme court. Tell me which government order, dated when, banned the Jallikkattu.

Do you want me to post the opinions of subramanya samy and that white pig menaka gandhi about jalli kattu?

Now these are Hindutvawadis? Swamy is a troll. As for Maneka (spell it right), when was she did she ever NOT speak about animals? She has been talking for animal welfare even when she was living in Indira Gandhi's house. Do you even know history? In fact she has been a bit eccentric when it comes to environment and animal welfare and it's a known fact. How is this related to Hinduism? And, how did she help bring a ban by the Supreme Court during the UPA government?

Everyone knows here how judiciary works for the politicians.

Which politician? The ban was handed out on May 7, 2014 by the Supreme court. Tell me which politician was involved in this.

There are no Aryan religions in India nor Aryan languages. Both Jainism and Buddhism are just different variants of Hindu thoughts.

Am I A Hindu? | Swarajya

I was about to post that link, but decided not to since I had already posted too many links.

As for Aryan, Dravidian, Buddhist , Jainist, neither do I believe in the differences. There is an integral unity. But in the academic point of view, these differences still exist, at least on paper.

 

[Maravan]

Then how did it get banned? Please explain the mechanism of how the ban came into effect, and that too by order of Supreme court. Tell me which government order, dated when, banned the Jallikkattu.



Now these are Hindutvawadis? Swamy is a troll. As for Maneka (spell it right), when was she did she ever NOT speak about animals? She has been talking for animal welfare even when she was living in Indira Gandhi's house. Do you even know history? In fact she has been a bit eccentric when it comes to environment and animal welfare and it's a known fact. How is this related to Hinduism? And, how did she help bring a ban by the Supreme Court during the UPA government?


Which politician? The ban was handed out on May 7, 2014 by the Supreme court. Tell me which politician was involved in this.


I was about to post that link, but decided not to since I had already posted too many links.

As for Aryan, Dravidian, Buddhist , Jainist, neither do I believe in the differences. There is an integral unity. But in the academic point of view, these differences still exist, at least on paper.

Where I told govt order banned jallikattu? read properly. Jaya banned animal slaughter in the temples and repelled the law after the public outrage. For this I don't need to give law name, date, time and all, check with your relatives if you really have in tamil nadu or with people who are really living in tamil nadu.

Jallikattu a western concept, BJP against it: Maneka Gandhi | india | Hindustan Times

Whole world is laughing on the judiciary after Jayas verdict and you are asking for the name. Instead of competing to lick the hindutvadi boots always, check the facts.

 

[Josef K]

Where I told govt order banned jallikattu? read properly. Jaya banned animal slaughter in the temples and repelled the law after the public outrage. For this I don't need to give law name, date, time and all, check with your relatives if you really have in tamil nadu or with people who are really living in tamil nadu.

Jallikattu a western concept, BJP against it: Maneka Gandhi | india | Hindustan Times

Whole world is laughing on the judiciary after Jayas verdict and you are asking for the name. Instead of competing to lick the hindutvadi boots always, check the facts.

You originally said:

Hindutvadis wants the whole world to follow their nonsense ideology. They are trying to impose their ideology everywhere some have.

Some white pig told that jallikattu is against hinduism, and it was banned.

I have proved to you very clearly that it was banned on May 7,2014, during the UPA govt. Even if by your wild allegation that the SC got influenced by the govt., the whole world also knows that, UPA is not a Hindutvawadi govt. So I caught you in your first lie.

I have also given you a link, where a much senior leader in BJP, Mr.Prakash Javadekar says that Centre is against Jallikattu ban, where as you are quoting Maneka Gandhi, who is known more as a social justice warrior and not as a Hindutvawadi. Also I posted a link showing Hindutvawadis like Ramagopalan talking against the ban. So I caught you in your second lie too.

As for your contention about the judiciary being supportive of the govt., then can you tell me why the SC was fighting against the present govt. over the collegium issue? And why has the SC frequently came down against the govt? You thought the SC is like our Madras High court or Bengaluru High court where every Judge is in the pockets of local politicians? The SC judges may have their flaws, but the SC is not something that can be easily influenced by the centre. Please do not keep embarassing yourself by exhibiting your ignorance here.

Also, I am not competing to lick Hindutvawadi boots, but am supporting the real Tamil religion - Hinduism, as any proud Tamil would do, instead of lying on an international forum.

 

[Maravan]

You originally said:



I have proved to you very clearly that it was banned on May 7,2014, during the UPA govt. Even if by your wild allegation that the SC got influenced by the govt., the whole world also knows that, UPA is not a Hindutvawadi govt. So I caught you in your first lie.

I have also given you a link, where a much senior leader in BJP, Mr.Prakash Javadekar says that Centre is against Jallikattu ban, where as you are quoting Maneka Gandhi, who is known more as a social justice warrior and not as a Hindutvawadi. Also I posted a link showing Hindutvawadis like Ramagopalan talking against the ban. So I caught you in your second lie too.

As for your contention about the judiciary being supportive of the govt., then can you tell me why the SC was fighting against the present govt. over the collegium issue? And why has the SC frequently came down against the govt? You thought the SC is like our Madras High court or Bengaluru High court where every Judge is in the pockets of local politicians? The SC judges may have their flaws, but the SC is not something that can be easily influenced by the centre. Please do not keep embarassing yourself by exhibiting your ignorance here.

Also, I am not competing to lick Hindutvawadi boots, but am supporting the real Tamil religion - Hinduism, as any proud Tamil would do, instead of lying on an international forum.

Jallikattu banned on 7th, but who ensured that the ban was in place on jan 2015 pongal. On many occasions courts banned jallikattu and the ban was lifted through various amendments and protests, first time in the history of tamil nadu jallikattu not happened in the BJP period as they showed clear negligence towards tamil tradition and even their minister told their party is against it.

Who cares about menaka gandhis personal biodata, when she is the ruling party minister.

You stop lying on an international forum, hinduism isn't original tamils religion. Earlier pandyas were jains, even their hindu epic ramayana says pandiyas were not in favor of their lord ram during the war and had peace with the srilankan king.

 

[Josef K]

Jallikattu banned on 7th, but who ensured that the ban was in place on jan 2015 pongal. On many occasions courts banned jallikattu and the ban was lifted through various amendments and protests, first time in the history of tamil nadu jallikattu not happened in the BJP period as they showed clear negligence towards tamil tradition and even their minister told their party is against it.

So you finally admit that the ban was not put in place by the present central govt., but it was only upholding a court order?

You stop lying on an international forum, hinduism isn't original tamils religion. Earlier pandyas were jains,

Before Jainism, what was the Pandyan religion?
What is the oldest book of Tamils? Tolkappiyam, isn't it? Who are the gods worshipped in Tamilnadu according to Tolkappiyam? What is the most famous book of Tamils? Tirukkural, isn't it? Who are the gods mentioned in that book?

even their hindu epic ramayana says pandiyas were not in favor of their lord ram during the war and had peace with the srilankan king.

But Mahabharata says, Pandians allied with the Pandavas agains the kauravas, doesn't it? Also, the Sri Lankan King, as per Ramayana is Ravana, who was a Shiva worshipping Brahmin and a Sanskrit scholar, wasn't he?

 

[Maravan]

So you finally admit that the ban was not put in place by the present central govt., but it was only upholding a court order?




Before Jainism, what was the Pandyan religion?
What is the oldest book of Tamils? Tolkappiyam, isn't it? Who are the gods worshipped in Tamilnadu according to Tolkappiyam? What is the most famous book of Tamils? Tirukkural, isn't it? Who are the gods mentioned in that book?


But Mahabharata says, Pandians allied with the Pandavas agains the kauravas, doesn't it? Also, the Sri Lankan King, as per Ramayana is Ravana, who was a Shiva worshipping Brahmin and a Sanskrit scholar, wasn't he?

They can uphold the court order now also, why suddenly they have to show interest on tamil tradition and will try to lift the ban? That means they could have lifted the ban earlier but they didn't? Isn't? Again, stop licking hindutvadi brahmin boots.

So pandya prefered peace with a devotee then a hindu god? That means he neglected that hindu god...

Ramayana told many stories to glorify their false god, like he can pierce holes on seven trees with one arrow and so many. By mistake they told that pandyas not supported ram, they wouldn't have expected that their gods dynasty couldn't survive long like the pandya dynasty can. Otherwise the worls might not have known that the tamil king pandya didn't favoured hindu god ram. Mahabharatha was written after ramayana, so ramayana has more credibility to talk about Pandyas ancient history.

And FYKI ramayana is said to be older than tholkappiyam.

 

[HariPrasad]

It's time for PLA bases in Nepal and supply nukes to Prachandra! Then you will see "fallout on India."

Does your Government have the guts? If yes than do that else shut your little mouth.

 

[Josef K]

They can uphold the court order now also, why suddenly they have to show interest on tamil tradition and will try to lift the ban? That means they could have lifted the ban earlier but they didn't? Isn't?

Did you follow the news or do you just spout more and more ignorance? The ban is still not lifted. The state govt. was supposed to appeal to the SC to lift the ban, but the TN govt. did not do that. The SC had made that order based on a list of animals given by the Centre in 2011. This year the TN govt. requested the Centre to remove bulls from that list, but made that request very late, just 2 days before the event. But the SC order clearly mentioned that safety arrangements should be made 30 days before the event. The Centre relented to the request and immediately removed bulls from the list, but the SC did not take the TN govt. plea because it was filed late. Do you read Tamil? Here is a Tamil source for you: Will Jallikattu possible this year | ஜல்லிக்கட்டு நடத்த கடைசி நேர மல்லுக்கட்டு: சிக்கலை ஏற்படுத்தும் நிபந்தனைகள் | Dinamalar

Again, stop licking hindutvadi brahmin boots.

And you are licking Kannadiga Periyar and Telugu Karuna's boots. Not to forget Telugu Vaiko and Christian Seeman's boots. So many boots at the same time??

So pandya prefered peace with a devotee then a hindu god? That means he neglected that hindu god...

By mistake they told that pandyas not supported ram, they wouldn't have expected that their gods dynasty couldn't survive long like the pandya dynasty can. Otherwise the worls might not have known that the tamil king pandya didn't favoured hindu god ram. Mahabharatha was written after ramayana, so ramayana has more credibility to talk about Pandyas ancient history.

Show me in which part of Ramayana is it mentioned that he neglected the Hindu god? In the book, Hanuman only tells about the kingdoms of the south. It does not say Pandyas fought against Rama in favor of Ravana. Neither does it say anywhere that the Pandyans favored Ravana. Did you even read the book?

The reference to the peace treaty comes from some temple inscriptions (which also say Pandyas did many Yagams). It says Pandyas and Ravana had signed a peace treaty after having tensions between the two kingdoms. This was before Rama entered the scence. There is also a reference to this in Kalidasa's work, Raghuvamsam.

And how do you think, Pandyans were able to make Ravana sign the peace treaty? Pandyans worshipped Shiva and got weapons from Shiva just like Ravana did. So, there you go. Pandyans were the earliest Shaivites. Your lie exposed again.

On the other hand, Mahabharata very clearly says that the Pandyans were fighting to help the Pandavas.

Also, what about Tolkappiyam and Agattiyam mentioning Hindu gods? What about Tirukkural mentioning Hindu deities?

 

[Maravan]

Did you follow the news or do you just spout more and more ignorance? The ban is still not lifted. The state govt. was supposed to appeal to the SC to lift the ban, but the TN govt. did not do that. The SC had made that order based on a list of animals given by the Centre in 2011. This year the TN govt. requested the Centre to remove bulls from that list, but made that request very late, just 2 days before the event. But the SC order clearly mentioned that safety arrangements should be made 30 days before the event. The Centre relented to the request and immediately removed bulls from the list, but the SC did not take the TN govt. plea because it was filed late. Do you read Tamil? Here is a Tamil source for you: Will Jallikattu possible this year | ஜல்லிக்கட்டு நடத்த கடைசி நேர மல்லுக்கட்டு: சிக்கலை ஏற்படுத்தும் நிபந்தனைகள் | Dinamalar



And you are licking Kannadiga Periyar and Telugu Karuna's boots. Not to forget Telugu Vaiko and Christian Seeman's boots. So many boots at the same time??



Show me in which part of Ramayana is it mentioned that he neglected the Hindu god? Hanuman only tells about the kingdoms of the south. It does not say Pandyas fought against Rama in favor of Ravana. Neither does it say anywhere that the Pandyans favored Ravana. Did you even read the book?

The reference to the peace treaty comes in Maduraikanchi. It says Pandyas and Ravana had signed a peace treaty after having tensions between the two kingdoms. This was before Rama entered the scence. There is also a reference to this in Kalidasa's work, Raghuvamsam.

And how do you think, Pandyans were able to make Ravana sign the peace treaty? Pandyans worshipped Shiva and got weapons from Shiva just like Ravana did. So, there you go. Pandyans were the earliest Shaivites. Your lie exposed again.

On the other hand, Mahabharata very clearly says that the Pandyans were fighting to help the Pandavas.

Also, what about Tolkappiyam and Agattiyam mentioning Hindu gods? What about Tirukkural mentioning Hindu deities?

You mean to say jallikattu got permission 30days prior before this ban, have you ever watched jallikattu in life?. I never remember a time permission got to conduct jallikattu before one month in the past three years. Like this hot news came in dinamalar last time also. Instead of googling hard to lick brahmin,bjp,rss,sangh parivar boots all in one time talk with someone who is really from the surroundings of madurai.

Don't show that you are an ignorant again and again. Ramayana is older than mahabaratha and tholkappiyam. So don't quote foolishly from mahabaratha and tholkappiyam to prove early pandyas supported hindu gods.

Pandyas didn't fight with your god's side against a human. This shows how much importance that god earned from him.

 

[xyxmt]

looks like every country keeps slapping India

 

[Donald Trump]

"A neighbouring country's coming into the picture, or its being invited to solve our internal problems and challenges, is not acceptable at all," the paper says.

The English-language Kathmandu Post says an editorial that "Delhi would do well not to be seen as crossing the red line to meet its objective. It could box itself in a difficult position and see it lose its diplomatic leverage against certain parties and sections of the polarised society".

And what about China's interference in Nepali affairs when they called prominent politicians and especially the Nepali Maoist leader Prachanda before the draft constitution was made? They sucked up to China when the latter has no connection with the Nepalis where race, religion, culture, and traditions are concerned.

These are ungrateful people who depend on India for everything - gas, kerosene, gasoline for the cars buses and trucks, food, medicine and other necessities like vegetables and milk - have the gumption to ask India to mind its own business! Really?

We need to clamp sanctions on them. They'll collapse like a house of cards! Then we'll see who tweets asking India to back off!

 

[Josef K]

You mean to say jallikattu got permission 30days prior before this ban, have you ever watched jallikattu in life?. I never remember a time permission got to conduct jallikattu before one month in the past three years. Like this hot news came in dinamalar last time also. Instead of googling hard to lick brahmin,bjp,rss,sangh parivar boots all in one time talk with someone who is really from the surroundings of madurai.

Did you read the court order? The court order said that permission should be got 30 days before the Jallikkattu. The court order came in May 7, 2014. Do you even understand what I am saying here? Previously maybe the 30 day notice was not there. But after the order, the 30 day notice period was to be given and our TN govt.only approached within a week for Jallikkattu.

Don't show that you are an ignorant again and again. Ramayana is older than mahabaratha and tholkappiyam. So don't quote foolishly from mahabaratha and tholkappiyam to prove early pandyas supported hindu gods.

Pandyas didn't fight with your god's side against a human. This shows how much importance that god earned from him.

உங்களுக்கு English புரியலையா தம்பி? நான் முதல்லையே தெளிவா கேட்டிருக்கேன் பாருங்க. இராமாயணத்துல எந்த இடத்துல, இராவணன் பாண்டிய மன்னன் கூட அமைதி ஒப்பந்தம் செய்ததா குறிப்பிட்டிருக்காங்க? இராமாயணத்துல அப்படி ஒரு சம்பவம் வரவே இல்லை. அனுமன், இராமன் கிட்ட தென்னகத்துல இருக்குற நாடுகளைப் பத்தி விலாவரியா சொல்லும்போது, சேர, சோழ பாண்டியர்களைப் பத்தி சொல்றாப்புல வரும்...அவ்வளவுதான். ஆனா நீங்க சொல்ற மாதிரி அமைதி ஒப்பந்தம்லாம் வர்றது, காளிதாசர் எழுதுன இராமாயணத்துல. அதிலயுமே, பாண்டியன் சிவபக்தன்னுதான் சொல்லப்பட்டிருக்கு. இன்னொரு இடம் என்னதுன்னா, சின்னமனூர் கல்வெட்டுலயும் இந்த செய்தி வருது. அந்தக் கல்வெட்டுல கூட பாண்டியர்கள், பெரிய பெரிய யாகம் செய்த இந்துக்கள்னுதான் சொல்லப்பட்டிருக்கு.

 

[Neuro]

Hinduism is the quintessential Tamil religion more than the later day Aryan Jainism/Buddhism. But Dravidian politicians, just for the sake of scoring political mileage made all these gullible people believe that Tamils were better off as Jains or atheists or something else. In fact, many aspects of Hindu deities (and in fact some Hindu deities themselves) were from the early Tamil Hinduism. I wouldn't call him an idiot. Just a gullible guy.

Care to explain...........

They can uphold the court order now also, why suddenly they have to show interest on tamil tradition and will try to lift the ban? That means they could have lifted the ban earlier but they didn't? Isn't? Again, stop licking hindutvadi brahmin boots.

So pandya prefered peace with a devotee then a hindu god? That means he neglected that hindu god...

Ramayana told many stories to glorify their false god, like he can pierce holes on seven trees with one arrow and so many. By mistake they told that pandyas not supported ram, they wouldn't have expected that their gods dynasty couldn't survive long like the pandya dynasty can. Otherwise the worls might not have known that the tamil king pandya didn't favoured hindu god ram. Mahabharatha was written after ramayana, so ramayana has more credibility to talk about Pandyas ancient history.

And FYKI ramayana is said to be older than tholkappiyam.

What is this I can't understand.......where you buying such things???

Jallikattu banned on 7th, but who ensured that the ban was in place on jan 2015 pongal. On many occasions courts banned jallikattu and the ban was lifted through various amendments and protests, first time in the history of tamil nadu jallikattu not happened in the BJP period as they showed clear negligence towards tamil tradition and even their minister told their party is against it.

Who cares about menaka gandhis personal biodata, when she is the ruling party minister.

You stop lying on an international forum, hinduism isn't original tamils religion. Earlier pandyas were jains, even their hindu epic ramayana says pandiyas were not in favor of their lord ram during the war and had peace with the srilankan king.

False propaganda ......what about IVC ,what about Pasupathi nathar??? in nepal. Get your facts correctly.