Argus Panoptes
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,065
- Reaction score
- 0
Now the shoe is on the other foot!
Just as you folks 'deduce' things about the ISI and Army, just as you folks deduce alot of other things regarding the state apparatus, we deduce this.
The whole world revolves and works on suppositions my friend.
For a debate, you need to have suppositions.
For making ROE's and having some sort of a procedure in place, you need to have a supposition. For example, in the military you suppose that the enemy does XYZ and then you react to that supposition and make appropriate contingencies.
Because of a supposition, you are proactive. Without suppositions, you are reactive.
Both of the scenarios have an equal chance of being possible, the passports are his or aren't. For a discussion, we have to believe that they are his. We then move on further. Why does he have a diplomatic passport even when he isn't a PM? We then find out the rules and procedures relevant to this.
Hun ayna tay chaur na ho na sir jee...
Suppose all you want Sir. Let's see what your "sources" tell you about this tomorrow.
IF the passport is his, then he has it due to a decision by the competent authority.