Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What it make difference?
He remain guide and nominate or decide for his party. He can preside any meeting as a normal member of party right in Front Chair of table while their president of party sitting in a corner, signed by may a party president but decided by him openly. So WTF is make it all this different?
These people are in the habit of just farting. Ask them....can you provide proofs of documents, testimonies or anything that indicates the army did this? thank you.
What it make difference?
He remain guide and nominate or decide for his party. He can preside any meeting as a normal member of party right in Front Chair of table while their president of party sitting in a corner, signed by may a party president but decided by him openly. So WTF is make it all this different?
and WTF happened to Altaf scum?
Nawaz's power is being chopped up and taken away in piecemeals.
And very soon the question of PMLN being a valid party will be raised ... that how can a party be named after a disqualified person and the party's own constitution coming under review. Interesting times ahead for us and miserable one for noonies.
can you provide proofs of documents, testimonies or anything that indicates the army did this? thank you.
These people are in the habit of just farting. Ask them....
These nincompoops are traitors and barking and farting against the PA and appreciating Modi, RAW and Mujib-ur-Rehman is their favourite hobby.
- Panama leaks arranged by PA?
- Did army used the Calibri font?
- Did army failed them to provide money trail?
- Did army ask them to get iqamas?
- Did army opened fraudulent offshore companies?
- Did army ask them to abuse judiciary and the state of Pakistan?
- Did army force them to lie constantly even on the flour of the national assembly?
'Nawaz does not qualify to serve as PML-N chief': SC gives verdict in Elections Act 2017 case
Haseeb BhattiFebruary 21, 2018
4
0
Former premier Nawaz Sharif does not qualify to serve as the PML-N chief, said a three-member Supreme Court (SC) bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar in a verdict on the petitions challenging the controversial Elections Act 2017 which paved the way for Sharif to resume his position as party chief following his disqualification from public office.
The Senate elections scheduled for March 3 will also be postponed, DawnNews reported.
The SC had been hearing petitions against the Elections Act 2017 filed by the Pakistan Tereek-i-Insaf (PTI), Awami Muslim League's leader Sheikh Rashid, PPP and others, since January 2018.
During the course of Wednesday's hearing, Additional Attorney General (AAG) Rana Waqar told the SC that the Constitution provides every citizen with the right to join or form a political party.
Waqar referred to Article 17 of the Constitution that concerns "freedom of association" and said that the second clause of the article specifically gives citizens the right to form or join a political party.
Justice Nisar, however, said that in Pakistan's political setup, political parties are personality driven. Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan seconded the CJP's statement, saying that political parties are a "one-man show".
Rashid's lawyer Farogh Naseem pointed out that Article 17(2) is "subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the sovereignty or integrity of Pakistan".
He insisted that a person who violates Article 62 and 63 of the Constitution should not be allowed to lead a political party since it is a "matter of public leadership".
Babar Awan, the counsel for PTI, another petitioner in the case, directed the court's attention towards the upcoming Senate elections and said that a disqualified politician was handing out tickets for Senate candidates from the PML-N.
Awan recalled that South African leader Nelson Mandela expelled his wife from his party but she never said "mujhey kyun nikala" (why was I expelled), a question that has constantly been raised by Nawaz at public gatherings and rallies.
Nawaz was disqualified by an apex court in the Panama Papers case last year under Article 62 of the Constitution for failing to declare a receivable salary as an asset.
"Don't owe an explanation to anyone"
Referring to Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi's speech in the Parliament on Monday, Justice Nisar said that the judiciary had never called any politician a "thief". Instead, the CJP said that he had praised the country's leadership and added that he does not "owe anyone an explanation".
PM Abbasi had criticised the judiciary for "insulting" elected officials, during a National Assembly session on Monday.
“I was not willing to say this but it had become necessary. The elected representatives of the 207 million people are being dubbed as thief, robber and mafia. Sometimes threats are being hurled that we [judges] will nullify the legislation that you [parliamentarians] have passed,” Mr Abbasi said in his apparent reference to the hearing of the Elections Act 2017 case.
This is a breaking story that is being developed as more information becomes available. Initial reports in the media are sometimes inaccurate. We will strive to ensure timeliness and accuracy by relying on credible sources such as concerned, qualified authorities and our staff reporters.
It's because pmln is the real LadlaI don't understand how can courts take on his whining after every hearing outside the courts. The way they are talking about courts and judicial system is so disgraceful if they can send nehal hashmi to jail why can't they be booked.
There assets abroad and within the country should be seized. And their entire family should be tried in the courts especially that disgraceful captain.