What's new

Navy Plan, X-47B N-UCAS attack China

cnleio

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
10,563
Reaction score
19
Country
China
Location
China
Wikileak: X-47B N-UCAS go ~!

The US Navy CV strick groups will send X-47B fleets 6000km far away from PRC, the first X-47B fleets will attack the targets in East of China. Then CV strick groups close to 3000km far away, the X-47B still need refuel and fly into China. After destroy high risk of targets Navy CV strick groups can reach 1000km and will send F-18 and other fighters continue attack mainland of China

130453bxcxcdgces4zr1ce.jpg.thumb.jpg



The F-18E/F and F-35B/C can't keep AC safty at the risk of enemy's attack
143333tz47qg73hd2t2t4c.jpg.thumb.jpg



But X-47B can fly more further
130459iksba7lisbrdpiss.jpg.thumb.jpg


203459w87c9dtgwio8sy8p.jpg.thumb.jpg



The revenge from China

191234wj820zqccggxchzc.jpg.thumb.jpg




N-UCAS strick coverage

1147434a2kaa344jzqwae6.jpg
 
.
wow, can I see this film anywhere in a cinema?
 
. . . .
Let's not manufacture fantasies here.

U.S. dare not attack China for sure. I have to be really sorry for those small fishes following U.S. hoping U.S. for protections.

What is in U.S. interest to have such a all weather doom-day like battle with China??? You think U.S. will do that for you???

You won't be that naive, right?
 
.
Let's not manufacture fantasies here.

U.S. dare not attack China for sure. I have to be really sorry for those small fishes following U.S. hoping U.S. for protections.

What is in U.S. interest to have such a all weather doom-day like battle with China??? You think U.S. will do that for you???

You won't be that naive, right?

The US has no desire to attack China, but we will defend our treaty allies when requested. The strength of our word to the world at large is a core US interest.
 
.
Yeahhh..

Im not exactly sure of the effectivness of the Su-30MK2s against a SM-2 equipped battleground.. and even more less of the Sovremenny DDG ..
Lets not even go near the Sub tech.

The US has no desire to attack China, but we will defend our treaty allies when requested. The strength of our word to the world at large is a core US interest.

Yeahh... Im not exactly sure that the track record of that is going to back that statement up..
 
.
This would be a good Hollywood Movie Script. If you talk about the real stuff, THIS WILL NEVER HAPPENED.

Why would the first line of Offence will start from naval branch when the USAF have more asset than the Navy in Asia?

Not to mention why do we need to attack China in the first place??

By the way, combat radius is straightly used for CAP where Hang time is a consideration, in the strike package you mentioned, you count combat range or strike range as you are talking about a predetermined target Alpha strike, which you don't need to hang around, and the combat range for a loaded F-18E/F before refuelling and drop tank is more than 1200 nmi. Go in, strike and get out.

But people think US dare not attack ANY country in this world is stupid. US will attack any country in this world if the need arise. Infact we are the most combat experienced country with 1 war in every 10 years. If you mess with us, we will get to you, one way or another.
 
.
Yeahh... Im not exactly sure that the track record of that is going to back that statement up..

You don't have to, only the opinion of those in charge matters. I don't see China trying to test our commitment yet, though they are trying to test at what point our ally's red lines are at, and consequently what our red line is at.
 
.
Yeahhh..

Im not exactly sure of the effectivness of the Su-30MK2s against a SM-2 equipped battleground.. and even more less of the Sovremenny DDG ..
Lets not even go near the Sub tech.



Yeahh... Im not exactly sure that the track record of that is going to back that statement up..

Seems our track record is enough to deter China from invading Taiwan and other Asian countries.
 
.
I thought ph has requested numerous times.

In addition, I thought sk has requested many times as well. U.S. even dare not attack the smaller nk.

The US has no desire to attack China, but we will defend our treaty allies when requested. The strength of our word to the world at large is a core US interest.
 
.
We'll unite the Taiwan someday by force maybe.in near future,as TW is a part of ZhongGuo.
We'd never invade into Taiwan,since the Taiwan is not a legitimate state on earth.
 
.
The X 47 B has a 2100 nautical mile range. I imagine the US wants to use to destroy our DF 21D launchers so they can move the carrier fleet closer to establish coastal blockade.

In practice it might not work, though. Any preemptive strike on the China mainland would be seen as an all out war. If China knows a conventional war means its doom, then it might as well launch all the ICBM for a mutual destruction.
 
.
The X 47 B has a 2100 nautical mile range. I imagine the US wants to use to destroy our DF 21D launchers so they can move the carrier fleet closer to establish coastal blockade.

In practice it might not work, though. Any preemptive strike on the China mainland would be seen as an all out war. If China knows a conventional war means its doom, then it might as well launch all the ICBM for a mutual destruction.
Not if ICBM are blown up before they even launch.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom