What's new

NATO to keep forces in Afghanistan until the Taliban uprising is extinguished

No, we will do nothing in this regards but seal the borders and NATO should deal with mess they created for soviet union.

in the end Karma is a bitch

Good , Donanld Trump would have you do that too.

You should prepare yourself for that NATO presence in your backyard for long long time.

keep looking over your shoulder,

when is the next drone gonna strike?

Who all are CIA agents in Pakistan?

Or American are flying into Pakistan again, are they coming for Taliban/Al Qaida commander or they going after the nukes.
 
.
Good , Donanld Trump would have you do that too.

You should prepare yourself for that NATO presence in your backyard for long long time.

keep looking over your shoulder,

when is the next drone gonna strike?

Who all are CIA agents in Pakistan?

Or American are flying into Pakistan again, are they coming for Taliban/Al Qaida commander or they going after the nukes.

We are clearing the mess steadily so all above mention problem wont effect us.
 
.
This is really bad news for Afghanistan. I hope Trump comes into power and pulls out all the troops. Foreign bases on Afghan soil is not acceptable and this will give more legitimacy to the militants to keep on fighting because the kuffars have invaded their land.
 
.
This is really bad news for Afghanistan. I hope Trump comes into power and pulls out all the troops. Foreign bases on Afghan soil is not acceptable and this will give more legitimacy to the militants to keep on fighting because the kuffars have invaded their land.

Says a person who is sitting in the UK ( so called Kuffar by your logic ) and here you advocating what the NUG and Afghanistan should do to secure the country.

Double standards, NO ?
 
.
Says a person who is sitting in the UK ( so called Kuffar by your logic ) and here you advocating what the NUG and Afghanistan should do to secure the country.

Double standards, NO ?

Its not my logic, I am mearly pointing out how this gives excuse to the militants to legitimise their fight through emotional blackmail and using Islam. Many Afghans will fall for it because of illiteracy.
 
.
Had Pakistan not supported Taliban to secure power in Afghanistan.
Had Pakistan put its foot down, when Taliban gave shelter to Al Qaida.

NATO wouldn't have been in Afghanistan, in the first place.

Even now, ball is still Pakistan's court. Finish off Taliban elements residing in Pakistan, either Taliban looses or becomes weak enough to accept the Afghan goverment's terms. Afghanistan becomes stable, NATO leaves Afghanistan.
You do realize that the 9/11 attacks were false flag attacks engendering a shift in public opinion for the purposes of war?
 
.
You do realize that the 9/11 attacks were false flag attacks engendering a shift in public opinion for the purposes of war?

Do you really believe this stuff ? :D
 
.
Dont care about Afghans or Afghanistan seal the border kick the Afghan refugees back and they can do whatever they like
 
.
In other words they will have bases in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future. Brilliant honestly. Create a vassal government which is reliant on you for its safety. Demonize the opposition to this vassal government, and bingo, you have the right to build bases on their territory to fight this evil opposition.

Having said that we all know what happened to Shah Shujah Durrani, when he made Afghanistan a vassal state of the British in the 1800s. The people hated him for his subservience to foreigners and revolts began subsequently. William Dalrymple outlines very clearly the parallels between the modern day NATO/Kabul governments struggle with the Taliban, and Shah Shujahs struggle with Dost Mohammad Khan in the 1800, in his book "Return of the King".

http://www.amazon.com/Return-King-Battle-Afghanistan-1839-42/dp/0307948536
 
.
Bad news for Pakistan..after all the support they gave to Taliban just to ensure that Afghanistan becomes a vassal for Pakistan, their wish will remain unfulfilled as long as NATO stays.
 
.
In other words they will have bases in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future. Brilliant honestly. Create a vassal government which is reliant on you for its safety. Demonize the opposition to this vassal government, and bingo, you have the right to build bases on their territory to fight this evil opposition.

Having said that we all know what happened to Shah Shujah Durrani, when he made Afghanistan a vassal state of the British in the 1800s. The people hated him for his subservience to foreigners and revolts began subsequently. William Dalrymple outlines very clearly the parallels between the modern day NATO/Kabul governments struggle with the Taliban, and Shah Shujahs struggle with Dost Mohammad Khan in the 1800, in his book "Return of the King".

http://www.amazon.com/Return-King-Battle-Afghanistan-1839-42/dp/0307948536

1800s vs 2016 the Afghans are too smart to fall for showcasing Talis = Dost Mohammad Khan. Talis are nothing but a foreign backed proxy which are in the business of selling drugs and blowing up schools and innocent people.

Pakistan has provided/will provide military bases to China because it thinks it is in her interest, so lets not bring the top of subservience into this discussion here :). We provide bases to NATO and the US because we think its in our interest period!
 
.
1800s vs 2016 the Afghans are too smart to fall for showcasing Talis = Dost Mohammad Khan. Talis are nothing but a foreign backed proxy which are in the business of selling drugs and blowing up schools and innocent people.

That is your opinion. The fact that they are able to disappear out in the countryside and merge in with the populace suggests they have a certain amount of support amongst the populace to be able to do this. Plus if they were so despised by Afghans, then the well documented instances of Afghan militias switching sides to fight for the Taliban would never happen. Sure, many militias do this for money but if the Taliban were so hated as is implied by Kabul government supporters, then switching to such a despised foe would be an option not even conceivable. Either that or the Afghan populace are still not "too smart".

Pakistan has provided/will provide military bases to China because it thinks it is in her interest, so lets not bring the top of subservience into this discussion here :). We provide bases to NATO and the US because we think its in our interest period!

If China removes its bases from Pakistan (none of which even exist at the moment), Pakistan will not fall into disarray. Multan (5th largest city like Kunduz) wont fall to the TTP, and Pakistan for sure will not have to rely on Chinese air and ground support to retake it. It would be serious intellectual dishonesty to state that the removal of NATO bases and the airstrikes that Afghan ground forces rely on from these bases, can in any way be compared to any hypothetical Chinese base in Pakistan.
 
.
That depends on Pakistan.

How long does it want, NATO to sit in its backyard.
NATO is a toothless tiger in Afghanistan. Pakistan won't mind even if NATO remains there till day of judgement.
Taliabans knows how to handle these pupits.
 
.
NATO is a toothless tiger in Afghanistan. Pakistan won't mind even if NATO remains there till day of judgement.
Taliabans knows how to handle these pupits.

Spoken like a true keyboard warrior, lots of empty rhetoric, but no foothold in reality.
 
.
Had Pakistan not supported Taliban to secure power in Afghanistan.
Had Pakistan put its foot down, when Taliban gave shelter to Al Qaida.

NATO wouldn't have been in Afghanistan, in the first place.

Even now, ball is still Pakistan's court. Finish off Taliban elements residing in Pakistan, either Taliban looses or becomes weak enough to accept the Afghan goverment's terms. Afghanistan becomes stable, NATO leaves Afghanistan.
Do this
Do that
Come on stop behaving like an ever demanding wife. Go and do what ever you want to do in Afghanistan.

By the way when was last time, we had a stable Afghanistan.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom