NATO forces winning war on terrorism in Afghanistan & Pakistan

[American Eagle]

For the few pro terrorist religious heretics who harm the good name of Islam by enabling and supporting terrorists who murder their fellow Muslims, which fellow Muslims in many cases do practice Peace, it is a shame you spend your limited time blaming the world at large, NATO, whoever instead of dealing with and getting rid of the terrorists yourselves. The actual terrorists are not tolerable and will not leave you in peace. They methods are violent and bloody and they will kill anyone who does not bow down to their skewed Wahabbi version of Islam.

But then many of the young folks who claim on this site to be Pakistanis are born in Europe and have never set foot inside Pakistan.

Take your misapplied blame making where it belongs, on al Qaida and it's fellow traveler, the Haqqani network and on those versions of the Taliban who live by violence and murder.

 

[U-571]

it's a shame, so many us soldiers gave their life for what? so the politicians could talk with taliban? they gave it so people could get freedom. those who makes compromises with the terrorists should be seen as public enemy #1 in the USA!

those who defend their lands are not terrorists, like ottoman empire in palestine

 

[Janubaba]

For the few pro terrorist religious heretics who harm the good name of Islam by enabling and supporting terrorists who murder their fellow Muslims, which fellow Muslims in many cases do practice Peace, it is a shame you spend your limited time blaming the world at large, NATO, whoever instead of dealing with and getting rid of the terrorists yourselves. The actual terrorists are not tolerable and will not leave you in peace. They methods are violent and bloody and they will kill anyone who does not bow down to their skewed Wahabbi version of Islam.

But then many of the young folks who claim on this site to be Pakistanis are born in Europe and have never set foot inside Pakistan.

Take your misapplied blame making where it belongs, on al Qaida and it's fellow traveler, the Haqqani network and on those versions of the Taliban who live by violence and murder.

Sir we don't need Americans to tell us about Islam you Americans have attacked several countries you Americans attacked Japan and used Nuclear Bombs on it you killed millions in vietnam and Iraq but now you are being killed in Afghanistan and now you are being defeated their by the Lions of Islam

 

[Malik Usman]

This Survey is conducted from those peoples who don't have any idea what is going on........on the ground and what is reality.........they are just giving their openions based on media reports and media is conducting this survey..........is that not strange.....You must conduct survey from Afghan peoples and they will realy tell who is winning the war......NATO or Talibans.....that will be authenticated and real survey.

 

[ahmed_naj]

those who defend their lands are not terrorists

how does blowing up schools and hospitals constitute to defending your land? Im sick of this 'freedom fighter' brush people use to paint the Taliban.

 

[Juice]

Sir we don't need Americans to tell us about Islam you Americans have attacked several countries you Americans attacked Japan and used Nuclear Bombs on it you killed millions in vietnam and Iraq but now you are being killed in Afghanistan and now you are being defeated their by the Lions of Islam

We attacked Japan? I love it when guys like you post, it shows the education level of those who oppose us.

 

[blackops]

Post reported..
blackops..You are not welcome to promote, suggest and welcome genocide mass murder in the name of fighting terrorism suggesting to wipe off countries/nations.

Lololololol as if you dont wish the same for us has seen people from pak celebrating when there were blasts in mumbai

 

[muse]

Afghan army soldier kills Nato service member
Reuters
(3 hours ago) Today

“An individual wearing an Afghan National Army uniform turned his weapon against International Security Assistance Force service members in southern Afghanistan today, killing one service member,” ISAF said in a statement. - File Photo

KANDAHAR: An Afghan army soldier killed at least one Nato soldier on Saturday, near the southern Afghan city of Lashkar Gah, due this week to be one of the first places where Nato will hand security control to Afghan forces, a senior police source said.

“The shooting happened during a joint security patrol,” said the senior police detective, who asked not to be named as he was not authorised to speak to the media.

The Nato-led International Security Assistance Force said it was investigating an incident in southern Afghanistan.

“An individual wearing an Afghan National Army uniform turned his weapon against International Security Assistance Force service members in southern Afghanistan today, killing one service member,” ISAF said in a statement.

 

[SMC]

^ Was hoping he killed several dozen. But I guess one is better than nothing.

 

[bularab]

Was he real Afghan soldier or dressed Taliban? If the first option, this is how much Afghans love their freedom (oil) friends.

 

[Juice]

Was he real Afghan soldier or dressed Taliban? If the first option, this is how much Afghans love their freedom (oil) friends.

No oil in Afghanistan...kinda puts play to the whole "blood for oil" cr@p. And don't give me that pipeline bull-if that's what we wanted, we would buy it, capitalist style.

 

[bularab]

Oh, yes. Afghanistan does not have oil. It have opium. During Taliban regime, opium production was forbidden. Now it is blooming. (After the enduring of freedom)

 

[Juice]

Oh, yes. Afghanistan does not have oil. It have opium. During Taliban regime, opium production was forbidden. Now it is blooming. (After the enduring of freedom)

At first opium bloomed under talibs. It was international pressure that led them to crack down. ISAF doesnt promote opium, but it is an army, not the dea. That is for police, not soldiers. (plus starving peasants right now wouldn't promote stability)

ps...it is the taliban that is funded from drug sales, you are not so wonky that you think the US would invade to score some heroin? We could have bought it on the street cheaper)

 

[bularab]

That doesn't change the fact U.S intervenes only if they have interests. Why they did nothing in Rwanda? In Angola? In Sierra Leonne?

 

[Juice]

That doesn't change the fact U.S intervenes only if they have interests. Why they did nothing in Rwanda? In Angola? In Sierra Leonne?

Well, duh. Of course we only intervene where we have interest. That is what we pay politicians for...to look after our interest, not hug bunnies and spread flowers.