What's new

NATO Forces Kill 13 Pak FC's out of a total of 27!

The background. This what happend yesterday.


GHALLANAI: The US-led NATO forces in Afghanistan Monday unlawfully entered Pakistani territory and seized a hilltop in Sheikh Baba in the upper Mohmand Agency.
Sources in the political administration confirmed the entrance of the NATO forces in the area and taking control of the well-known summit 'Spina Suka' in Sheikh Baba.


'Spina Suka' is a place situated in one of the two contentious areas where there is no certified Durand Line. One place of conflict is situated in Chaman, Quetta and another is in Mohamand Agency on Pak-Afghan border. Occasionally there is tension and exchange of firing between Pakistani forces and NATO troops.

"The choppers of the collation forces are flaying in the air which is spreading fear and terror among us and our families," locals told the Statesman.
The intentions of the NATO forces are pretty clear that they want to establish a post there and launch operation against the local Taliban in FATA near Pak-Afghan border, locals said.
The new development came a day after US unmanned spy planes were seen flying in the air in tribal areas near Pak-Afghan border.
In the areas adjoining the Durand Line, including North Waziristan, South Waziristan, and Bajaur Agency, American drones have increased aerial violations.
 
.
Mujahideen, it has been strongly condemned. Again, the issue is to make sure that NATO realizes that such acts will only alienate them and reduce support fro their mission.
Do you realize how much the Taliban are going to reap propaganda wise from this?
We do not want confrontation, we want respect and we get respect when the entire country gets behind an issue, and we can accomplish that without resorting to military action or breaking off ties.
Will we adopt some of Muse suggestions? Probably not this time around, but if it happens again public pressure is goign to build, and the GoP's denials will only go so far before they have to make some public statements along the lines of what Muse suggested, but also not break the alliance with NATO or our support for their efforts.

This wording has been seen before. It is no longer a joke. Believe me if I could I would start a long march on this issue. This is no longer a war on terror, but a war an attack on our soverignty. My soldiers, your soldiers, our soldiers have died. We will not let their sacrifice go to waste. Their is a song to which the Army marches to and its time to apply it here.
Aye marde aye mujahid jaag zara ib waqt i shahadt hai aya(Oh soldier get ready its time for martydom)
 
.
is their any possibility that this could be a inside job to gain public sympathy from much confused awam?
may allah rest our shaheed soldiers in peace..
 
.
Hey guys.. is their any possibility that this could be a inside job to gain public sympathy from much confused awam?
may allah rest our shaheed soldiers in peace..

What are you trying to say here that our own government killed its own soldiers.
 
.
i am just afraid that if we dont cooperate well with the NATO we may lose F-16s? :undecided:
 
.
i am just afraid that if we dont cooperate well with the NATO we may lose F-16s? :undecided:

The hell with the F-16's. We lived without them before and we can again. We defended our country without them before and we can do them again. These F-16's are not worth more the blood of our soldiers. We will not trade the blood of our soldiers for F-16's.
 
.
Hey guys.. is their any possibility that this could be a inside job to gain public sympathy from much confused awam?
may allah rest our shaheed soldiers in peace..

I think Jana's post and a Washington Post article may clarify the issue.

Afghan forces tried to set up a post on a disputed part of the territory, they got attacked by both the FC and possibly Taliban (the Afghans should not have tried the provocation) the cowards called in air support indicating that they were being attacked by Taliban only, or perhaps the airstrike knew that there were Pakistanis soldiers and did not care.
Details of the clash remained unclear late Wednesday, but it apparently pitted Afghan troops against a combination of Pakistani soldiers and Taliban insurgents.

Fighting erupted Tuesday evening when Afghan troops tried to establish a check post near the village area of Sheikh Baba in the Mohmand tribal region, along the knife's-edge border between the two countries, according to local villagers and Pakistani military officials.

Taliban militants apparently opened fire and were then joined by Pakistani military forces, setting off an hours-long battle. It is unclear what prompted the exchange of fire.

The skirmish at the edge of Pakistan's restive tribal areas expanded further when Afghan soldiers called NATO forces for air support, and U.S. military aircraft reportedly launched a strike in the area. ...

... At least nine Pakistani Taliban fighters and one child were killed during the clash, according to Maulvi Omar, a spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban.

Omar said Taliban fighters captured seven Afghan soldiers during the operation.

"We have inflicted heavy damages," Omar said. The Taliban spokesman said Islamist insurgents fought "side by side" with Pakistani soldiers against the Afghan forces during the operation.

washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines

Notice the last sentence in bold - the propaganda has already started...
 
.
What does everyone think of the statements by the NATO command and the local eyewitness on Page 2 of this article? Were the FC assisting militants in a cross-border incursion (which seems to be what NATO is claiming?)

timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4111277.ece

"I am told the Afghan troops were actually building a kind of new outpost, were challenged by the Pakistan army and then the firing started," said Zahid Hussain, Times correspondent in Islamabad.

"Helicopters also appeared when the clashes started. According to Pakistan military sources, the soldiers died in an airstrike by a US drone on Pakistani soldiers.

But Nato command at Bagram said that the incident began when coalition troops came under rocket and small arms attack from militants while 200 metres inside the Afghan border.

"Shortly after the attack began, coalition forces informed the Pakistan Army that they were being engaged by anti-Afghan forces in a wooded area near the Gora Prai checkpoint," it said in a statement.

[...]
One senior Pakistan officer on the ground appeared to support the Nato version of events, saying: "The militants launched a cross-border attack into Afghanistan. At least 10 of our soldiers were killed in a counter-offensive by forces in Afghanistan."

A Pakistan Taleban spokesman said that its fighters had attacked US forces and claimed that they had shot down a helicopter. The Taleban spokesman added that they had seen the airstrike on the Pakistan checkpoint.

Damagh Khan Mohmand, a local tribesman who witnessed the fighting, said that it lasted for four hours, with Afghan and foreign forces trading fire with the Pakistani militants and with the Pakistan troops.

Two aircraft bombed several locations, hitting two FC paramilitary posts, said Mr Khan Mohmand. He added that he saw drones flying over the area.
 
.
BBC Radio:

A US army spokesman has apologized for the killing of Pakistani soldiers and says that a full enquiry will be conducted.
 
.
I think Jana's post and a washington post article calrifies the issue.
Afghan forces tried to set up a post on a disputed part of the territory, they got attacked by both the FC and possibly Taliban (the Afghans should not have tried the provocation) the cowards called in air support indicating that they were being attacked by Taliban only, or perhaps the airstrike knew that there were Pakistanis soldiers and did not care.
Notice the last sentence in bold - the propaganda has already started...

Oh please this is just an excuse. They know what they did and they knew what they were doing. The Taliban are just an excuse.
 
.
go to hell there WOT.they kill our army persons we must have reply these killers NATOor US we have to reply hard before the hit our major cityes and say SORRY
 
. .
Look, keeping all jingoism aside, Pakistan needs the US in order to fight the extremists.

It would be foolish to break military relations with US over this.
 
.
Look, keeping all jingoism aside, Pakistan needs the US in order to fight the extremists.

It would be foolish to break military relations with US over this.

why you forget US and NATO needs pakistan more then us.if we stop all our services they sh1ts cant stop in afganistan 1 month.and go to hell there relations even they kill our army personals we need them why ?
 
.
Look, keeping all jingoism aside, Pakistan needs the US in order to fight the extremists.
It would be foolish to break military relations with US over this.

We dont need them, if they carry out acts like these. The aggreement was that they will not violate our soverignty, but they have. We lived without them before an we can again.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom