What's new

Nato allies shy away from Trump's demand for more Afghanistan troops

if you are stopping Terrorism then there won't be any problem in Afghanistan
Well, we aren't stopping or starting terrorism. We're only supporting people who seek independence from US. They're known as freedom fighters, a term given by the US during U.S.S.R's invasion of Afghanistan. US said they're holly freedom fighters. Now, your best friend is in need. Please send your soldiers to support US army because a friend in need is a friend in deed.
 
.
Yeah,no thank you,we're alright.

European Nato members have appeared to shy away from Donald Trump’s demand they follow America’s lead and dispatch significant numbers of extra troops to Afghanistan.

Germany said it was in no hurry to send extra troops to the long-running conflict and Britain said it would not go beyond an uplift already promised earlier this year.

France said no decision had been taken, but one French military expert said he would be “astonished” if Paris agreed to go back to Afghanistan. Spain and Italy’s government’s both declined to comment.

TELEMMGLPICT000137979048_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqwMJYxftKZExwjop9hyNEmQRSGxdwZZ3YY7Uv4oTmABQ.jpeg

The Afghanistan campaign, which began in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks, is America's longest ever war Credit: Jim Hollander/ REUTERS

Mr Trump is expected to send up to 4,000 more US troops after on Monday night he abandoned calls for a swift withdrawal from the country and instead made an open-ended commitment to America’s longest ever war.

In an about face on a conflict he once called futile, Mr Trump said US troops would now “fight to win”.

"We are not nation-building again. We are killing terrorists," he said in a prime-time televised address at a military base outside Washington.

"The consequences of a rapid exit are both predictable and unacceptable," he said. "A hasty withdrawal would create a vacuum that terrorists, including ISIS and al Qaeda, would instantly fill."

The reinforcements to train and advise the struggling Afghan forces and hunt down extremist militants come on top of around 8,400 already deployed.


US commanders earlier this year warned they were at a stalemate and Jim Mattis, the Defence Secretary admitted America was “not winning”. A string of districts have since fallen to Taliban-led insurgents.

The president demanded Pakistan do more to tackle terrorist "safe havens".

"Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan. It has much to lose by continuing to harbour terrorists," he said.

And he warned the Afghan government that it should not view US support as a "blank check".

"America will work with the Afghan government as long as we see determination and progress," he said.

"However, our commitment is not unlimited, and our support is not a blank cheque. The American people expect to see real reforms and real results."

America’s Nato allies also had to do more, Mr Trump said.

He said: “We will ask our Nato allies and global partners to support our new strategy, with additional troop and funding increases in line with our own. We are confident they will.”

Afghanistan-War-UK-Army-Withdrawal_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqD3d2dmOlWYuQkR76XZjLQGH28ZiNHzwg9svuZLxrn1U.jpg

Britain's combat mission ended in Afghanistan in 2014, but it has around 600 troops in the country Credit: Ben Birchall/PA

European allies appeared to shy away from his request however.

The German defence minister said her country, which has 950 troops in Afghanistan, would not be among the first nations to contribute more.


Ursula von der Leyen said: "We increased our troop numbers by 18 percent last year when others were cutting theirs. So we don't see ourselves in the front row of people who should be asked for more soldiers."

The Ministry of Defence in London said it had already announced in June that 85 more soldiers would be sent, bringing the UK detachment to 600.

A Whitehall source said: “We don’t see that number changing”.

French defence expert Jean-Dominique Merchet, said: "I would be astonished if France was prepared to send troops back to Afghanistan.

"We are already heavily present in the Sahel with 4,500 troops in Mali, Niger, Chad and Burkina Faso, and in Iraq, where there are around 1,000 French soldiers. That's a lot.

"France lost not far off 100 men in Afghanistan for nothing and their presence there could not be called a success."

Mr Trump’s decision to remain in Afghanistan risked angering supporters who voted for his ‘America First’ campaign promises to end US foreign interventions.

Breitbart, the conservative news website run by his former strategist Steve Bannon, called the new strategy a "flip-flop."

After his speech, Mr Trump flew to Arizona to rally supporters and try to recapture the Republican fervour that helped put him in office.


The two-day trip, which also includes a stop in Reno, Nevada, on Wednesday to speak to veterans at an American Legion conference, marks his farthest journey west since taking office in January.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/22/nato-allies-shy-away-trumps-demand-afghanistan-troops/
A wise decision no need to send troops in a death trap
 
.
if you are stopping Terrorism then there won't be any problem in Afghanistan
it's U.S.A who supports Taliban offices in Qatar (financial network) and other hands U.S is teaching a lesson to fight against terrorism. (hypocrisy)
Taliban Controls more then half of Afghanistan territory, is this Pakistan fault ??
Afghan Generals are involved in corruption and many U.S soliders have been killed by afghan soldiers. is this Pakistan fault ??

Pakistan successfully operated against terrorists, and terrorists have moved to Afghanistan, there is no save heaven in Pakistan for terrorists which U.S is not willing to understand. is this Pakistan fault ??

U.S blame on Pakistan about cross border terrorism and Pakistan says why not secure the afg-pak border (Durand Line) instead of wasting billions. but U.S is not interested to secure the border. is this Pakistan fault ??

Here is Pakistan fault
Pakistan supported U.S in this U.S created mess, war & terror in Afghanistan.
Pakistan wasted more then 80$ billions in this long 16 years of war and U.S paid 14$ billions to Pakistan yet.

why does not India send the troops to fight against Taliban ? we really wanna see what will you achieve which U.S failed to achieve in 17 years. India is free to waste Indian taxpayer money in Afghanistan. but now Pakistan should not fight for U.S anymore.
 
Last edited:
. . .
No country is stupid enough except India, to play for Trump and get its citizens killed for nothing.
 
. . . .
. .
India will send troops ??? LOL, which world are you living in ??? :p:
Why wont Bharat send in her armies? I am sure that the regime in Kabul would be glad.
 
.
Why wont Bharat send in her armies? I am sure that the regime in Kabul would be glad.

Why do you expect India to behave according to Pakistan's whim's and fancies ????? Moreover, our stand is clear, we will keep on providing Afghanistan with all possible economic assistance along with deep diplomatic, political and moral support just like the same Pakistan is providing Kashmiri separatists (not a penny less). Hope you got my point clearly. :azn::azn::azn:
 
.
Why do you expect India to behave according to Pakistan's whim's and fancies ????? Moreover, our stand is clear, we will keep on providing Afghanistan with all possible economic assistance along with deep diplomatic, political and moral support just like the same Pakistan is providing Kashmiri separatists (not a penny less). Hope you got my point clearly. :azn::azn::azn:
This is the only way that Kabul can defeat the Afghan Taliban, otherwise this civil war will continue indefinitely. I hope Trump pressurises Bharat into sending combat troops; Bharat is moving towards the Modern West from non alignment - just look at the dirty role she played for they who control the West when she demonetized two of the most popular currency notes in Bharat.
 
.
This is the only way that Kabul can defeat the Afghan Taliban, otherwise this civil war will continue indefinitely. I hope Trump pressurises Bharat into sending combat troops; Bharat is moving towards the Modern West from non alignment - just look at the dirty role she played for they who control the West when she demonetized two of the most popular currency notes in Bharat.

The last part of your comment especially the "demonetization" make very little to no sense at all. :(

Regarding defeating Taliban (irrespective of nation which they may represent), it can't be achieved by mere military power, rather a radical change in the education and thought process within Afghanistan should be brought about and implemented, which keep religion secondary to modern education. If the present Afghan government with the help of their friends achieve in doing that successfully, you will surely see the Taliban loosing a war in a decade or two, that too without too much violence. Going forward, a nationalist Afghanistan will be the best than a religious Afghanistan and I'm sure India can help a lot to achieve that. :-)
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom