What's new

Muzaffarnagar woman seeks abortion after being raped at gunpoint by her father-in-law... but clerics

Status
Not open for further replies.

APS

BANNED
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
277
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Nine years after Charthawal village’s infamous Imrana case, which had put the Islamic law under the public scanner, a similar case has come to light in a neighbouring village of Muzaffarnagar district.

A 28-year-old woman created ruffles in the local administration and the Muslim community on Thursday by moving an application before District Magistrate Kaushal Raj Sharma to arrest her father-in-law and allow her to abort her seven-month pregnancy.

My husband has been working in Dubai for the last two years. My father-in-law has been sexually assaulting me at gun point since 2013. I remained silent because he used to threaten to kill me. He also video recorded his act and threatened to make it public if I opened my mouth. When I told my husband about it, he blamed me for making a false allegation against his father. When I finally told my parents, they suggested me to take legal action against my rapist father-in-law,” the victim said.

1409873810910_wps_6_Muzaffarnagar_jpg.jpg





A 28-year-old Muzaffarnagar resident (whose identity we have disguised) says she was repeatedly raped by her father-in-law and is now pregnant.

Sharma confirmed that he had received the woman’s complaint and said: “I have asked the chief medical officer and the police to probe the case. Further action would be initiated against the culprit under the law.”

Clerics, however, have jumped into the case and have declared that, henceforth, the husband of the victim will be treated as her son.

Avoiding any comment against the father-in-law who repeatedly raped and blackmailed the victim, Maulana Mohammad Nazar of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind said: “As per the Sharia law, the baby in her womb is her husband’s brother. Her husband must divorce her, even if his father looked at his wife with lust.”

In 2005, 28-year-old Imrana was sexually assaulted by her father-in-law Mohammed Ali.

The local community panchayat had treated the case as that of adultery instead of rape, and ruled in the light of Sharia that her marriage with her husband stands null and void as the Islamic law considered sexual relations with both the father and the son as incestuous.

Instead of punishing the father-in-law, the panchayat ordered her to treat her husband as her son and his father as her husband.

Imrana was made to suffer after she dared to continue living with her husband.

Samajwadi Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav had supported the Islamic panchayat’s decision.




Read more: Muzaffarnagar woman seeks abortion after being raped at gunpoint by her father-in-law... but clerics order her 'to treat her husband as her son' | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

No secular outrage? No headlines?
 
.
WTF. ... nasty law.. yukk.... her father in law and the clerics must face consequence. ..
 
.
Clerics, however, have jumped into the case and have declared that, henceforth, the husband of the victim will be treated as her son.
South Asia has alot of such clerics

Avoiding any comment against the father-in-law who repeatedly raped and blackmailed the victim, Maulana Mohammad Nazar of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind said: “As per the Sharia law, the baby in her womb is her husband’s brother. Her husband must divorce her, even if his father looked at his wife with lust.”
This damned guy from hell should be hung by his balls for such a stupid statement!!

The local community panchayat had treated the case as that of adultery instead of rape, and ruled in the light of Sharia that her marriage with her husband stands null and void as the Islamic law considered sexual relations with both the father and the son as incestuous.
Why is panchayat system still used...mostly old pod smoking idiots with no knowledge of Islam but only due to birth right are running it!

Instead of punishing the father-in-law, the panchayat ordered her to treat her husband as her son and his father as her husband.
That is incredibly disgusting! I would like this bastard to point it out from the shariah where it says such shit!
 
. .
7 month abortion can be very dangerous for the mother.
true...it can be dangerous but the child though innocent would remind the mother of her ordeal....and might even suffer some psychological problems of rejection...
 
.
true...it can be dangerous but the child though innocent would remind the mother of her ordeal....and might even suffer some psychological problems of rejection...

Yeah, it's a difficult situation. For the mother I feel bad for what happened to her. But at the same time feel bad for the baby too. It's innocent victim in all of this. Maybe she can give up the baby for adoption. 7 month is a very advance stage for a baby to abort.
 
.
"Instead of punishing the father-in-law, the panchayat ordered her to treat her husband as her son and his father as her husband. "

WTF did i just read :suicide:
 
.
WTF??

Illiterate mullahs oppressing womens right.
That lady may be already psychologically disrupted.How can she treat her husband as her son and that man having her fathers age as her husband?
Stupid law.
 
. .
What ba$tard law is this? Which can say treat your husband as your son? Dont disgrace Islam more and more in the name of sharia and bullsh!tness. Hang the guilty on his balls.
 
Last edited:
.
What ba$tard law is this? Treat your husband as your son.

If muslim women themselves don't have problem with this, and if muslim men are ok with this, why should the Hindus worry about it ?
 
.
The local community panchayat had treated the case as that of adultery instead of rape, and ruled in the light of Sharia that her marriage with her husband stands null and void as the Islamic law considered sexual relations with both the father and the son as incestuous.

Is this is what sharia tells ? can any Muslim members or knowledgeable members put a light on this ?
 
.
you just cannot abort a 7 month old child- it will be not justifiable under any circumstance- except if the mothers life is in danger-

The local mullahs :hitwall: - how can they void a genuine marriage on basis of rape?- that's a very bad precedence to set-
 
.
Hope its an exception
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom