What about mosques, kabba etc ? Can you through some light on it ?
like i have said from the very first page... only a few mosques ( about ten maybe ) are actually important to muslims. and that is for historical reasons... the initiation of islam and the conquest by muslims.
prayers are best done privately. according to my understanding, the "ups and downs" in prayers, as you put it, comes from the hadees books, written at least a hundred years after initiation of islam. so the "ups and downs" are a tradition and not a requirement. no thunderbolt will strike someone if they don't do "ups and downs" or if they even not pray... what is prayer anyway??
the mosque is not some magical place where blessings of god will rain down. the mosque is not some "house of god". that would be idolatry. but the modern indian muslims and from iran and from indonesia and the taliban... believe it is, because they have adopted this idea and other practices from hinduism and zarthushti culture ( zoroastrianism ). and this is one of the reasons that they cannot be called muslim. they are munafiq, meaning fake-muslim, pretender-muslim.
so most mosques in the world can be and should be demolished. in fact, it is the fanatic mosque goers who were used by the crusaders and modern western governments to wage war against the true muslim societies like nasser's egypt, libyan jamahiriya, baathi iraq/syria, siad barre's somalia ( pre 1991 ), democratic republic of afghanistan ( socialist afghanistan, 1978 to 1991 ) etc.
kaaba is a historical place.
And by the way can I reply in the same fashion ?
Ok . Lets see.
I can not be attracted by a fanatic ideology follower. No Maulana Maududi, No grand mufti, mullah please.
indeed, sir. because those maulanas and mullahs are fake-muslim. you won't find true islam among them.
But yes I can certainly be attracted towards someone ready to realize the foolishness of doing ups and downs, postures five time a day, shooughting on loud speakers, eating twice a day and calling it a fast, go arab , kiss the black stone and call it pilgrimage, or the insanity of putting religion above Humanity, Country and family...
jamal abdul nasser, one of the greatest of muslim leaders, had banned loudspeakers in mosques in the 1950's, i think. and this is other than banning the ikhwaan ul "muslimoon" group ( "muslim" brotherhood ). nasser realized that all this modern tradition of making of prayers so strict and ever-present had turned muslims into jews and hindus.
i have never fasted, because i am among fake-muslims... the modern indian ritual-following "muslims", who do all this fasting and feasting while ignoring the hundreds of thousands of muslims murdered in libya and syria by taliban and al qaida, just since
2011.
anyone who claims to be muslim, does only prayers and fastings, but ignores the rest, has the choice of going to another religion.
kissing the black stone is not allowed.
as for putting islam above humanity, country and family...
true islam is socialism... which is humanitarianism... which automatically negates the modern concept of "nations" and the older concept of "tribes" and 'kingdoms"... didn't hazrat muhammad's own tribe ( quraish ) become his enemy when he proclaimed islam??
in true islam, the rights of the individual are more important than whatever of the family... and this is shown in islam in the procedures followed in marriage, divorce, remarriage and inheritance.
the same religion which call other religions as false and make people intolerant.
when true islam provides humanity all these rights, freedoms, simplifications of life and relief from rituals... it is automatic that true muslims ( such as myself or salahuddin or nasser or muammar or saddam ) consider other religons ( esp. hinduism ) as false. why should true muslims be tolerant of allowing 330 million gods or sati or "honor killing" or caste system or widow for life or...
And I wish that modern hindu females In india should leave all those rituals and attract muslim males to true hinduism .... the true hinduism called as sanatan dharma which prescribes the "eternal" duties all Hindus have to follow, regardless of class, caste, or sect, such as honesty, purity, and self-restrain, which was practised by Vivekananda.
i wish that modern hindu males in india should not follow the fake saints and their rituals and follow true sanatan dhrma and attract muslim ladies to true hinduism.
you know, the burqa and "namaaz ki topi" types in india have no problem in joining the bjp "minority cell", or calling for a joint statement with bajrang dal and ram sena
but for the non-dramebaaz female muslims, like shaukat azmi or huma qureshi, there will be problems in getting them into sanatana dharma.
in fact, i just wish for modern indian hindus to see the humanity and socialism in true hinduism.
no offense... but "humanity and socialism in true hinduism"...
i have woken quite late, and that statement has put me in a cheerful mood...
"socialism in true hinduism"
