What's new

Muslims attack French satirical paper Charlie Hebdo.

What economic issue are you ranting about ? Was Faisal Shahzad economically deprived ? Was Osama bin Laden or Al Zawahiri economically deprived ? Fundamentalism does not have a positive correlation with poverty, period.

As I said before, the discussion is about dis-respect of Islam, I don't care about the actions of Muslims. There are idiots in your communities. Osama Bin Laden was the Wests hero at one time, a few years later he becomes an enemy. He was even denied a trial like Gaddafi. What kind of monsters are you???
 
.
As I said before, the discussion is about dis-respect of Islam, I don't care about the actions of Muslims. There are idiots in your communities. Osama Bin Laden was the Wests hero at one time, a few years later he becomes an enemy. He was even denied a trial like Gaddafi. What kind of monsters are you???
I ask the question AGAIN ; which Idiots in my community in a foreign land have driven planes into buildings or have kept bombs in cars to cause civilian destruction ? You will not find even a handful of examples of someone doing so. Why ? THAT is the question you need to answer yourself.
 
.
I ask the question AGAIN ; which Idiots in my community in a foreign land have driven planes into buildings or have kept bombs in cars to cause civilian destruction ? You will not find even a handful of examples of someone doing so. Why ? THAT is the question you need to answer yourself.

I asked a question earlier as well to one of your fellow countrymen that wasn't answered. What do you make of the provaction?? If the offices weren't attacked how would you see the situation? This isn't about freedom of speech, it's blasphemy against Islam.

Your clever in asking that 'outside of India' how many Sikhs/Hindus have done these things. Lets look inside India shall we, Sikhs killed many Muslims doing partition and Hindus are still persecuting Muslims on a daily basis. Again no response to my Shiv Sena comments.

As commented many times before, there are ramifications to everything. BTW 9/11 was an inside job, there was no proof that Muslims were behind it. Mossad of Israel was behind this. If the US holds any substance then why was Saudi Arabia not attacked, how many Iraqi's were on those planes? Why was Iraq attacked? The illegal war on Iraq had ramifications i.e. the attacks in London on 7/7. If 9/11 wasn't an inside job, then it was due to ramifications from the support of the US to Israel to suppress and kill Arabs. If I was attacked in Palestine, Iraq or Afghanistan I would be walking around like a nutter trying to get me some justice too.

Everything happens for a reason.
 
.
so making fun of each other is a part of a secular society

am i right????
 
. .
Now don't ask that newspaper and their workers to love islam when islam has tried to burn them alive...

And is this the islamic guidance abdullah want to world to follow???
 
.
Now don't ask that newspaper and their workers to love islam when islam has tried to burn them alive...

And is this the islamic guidance abdullah want to world to follow???


even the newspaper said attack was not from Muslim.


Find another reason to start troll here. This one will not work
 
.
I asked a question earlier as well to one of your fellow countrymen that wasn't answered. What do you make of the provaction?? If the offices weren't attacked how would you see the situation? This isn't about freedom of speech, it's blasphemy against Islam.

Your clever in asking that 'outside of India' how many Sikhs/Hindus have done these things. Lets look inside India shall we, Sikhs killed many Muslims doing partition and Hindus are still persecuting Muslims on a daily basis. Again no response to my Shiv Sena comments.

As commented many times before, there are ramifications to everything. BTW 9/11 was an inside job, there was no proof that Muslims were behind it. Mossad of Israel was behind this. If the US holds any substance then why was Saudi Arabia not attacked, how many Iraqi's were on those planes? Why was Iraq attacked? The illegal war on Iraq had ramifications i.e. the attacks in London on 7/7. If 9/11 wasn't an inside job, then it was due to ramifications from the support of the US to Israel to suppress and kill Arabs. If I was attacked in Palestine, Iraq or Afghanistan I would be walking around like a nutter trying to get me some justice too.

Everything happens for a reason.

I did answer your question, check post #47
 
.
even the newspaper said attack was not from Muslim.


Find another reason to start troll here. This one will not work

Oh,then did a monk attack that newspaper??? or some martians??

not trolling....but yes facts hurt for u
they were muslims and they attacked the newspaper destroying their equipment and incurring great loss to them...and they will surely not love those muslims from now on..this is the fact...swallow it
 
.
Oh,then did a monk attack that newspaper??? or some martians??

not trolling....but yes facts hurt for u
they were muslims and they attacked the newspaper destroying their equipment and incurring great loss to them...and they will surely not love those muslims from now on..this is the fact...swallow it
yeah yeah you saw in your crystal ball that they were Muslims :cheesy:
 
.
Oh,then did a monk attack that newspaper??? or some martians??

not trolling....but yes facts hurt for u
they were muslims and they attacked the newspaper destroying their equipment and incurring great loss to them...and they will surely not love those muslims from now on..this is the fact...swallow it

i think one of the problem people have with Muslims is why they worship a God they have not seen and will never see

and now in order to blame Muslim same people are accusing us of a crime they have not seen
 
.
I get a feeling the red meat in this forum is for posters from a certain country.
 
.
Good job Muslim guys, i cherish you have guts to teach these bastards a good lesson. I wish the guy beaten up would rub heated creams on the blows for many days with the help of his family. Well done.
 
. .
Well now this is fast turning into France vs. Islam, of course these terrorists aren'y making it any better.

France and Islam
Fighting freedom with fire
Nov 2nd 2011, 15:06 by S.P. | PARIS

20111105_EUP503_290.jpg


WHEN the French satirical weekly, Charlie Hebdo, reprinted controversial Danish cartoons of the Prophet, Muhammad, five years ago, French political leaders were ambivalent. Jacques Chirac, then the president, called it a “manifest provocation”. “Anything that can wound the convictions of others should be avoided,” he declared. Today’s political reactions to a fresh controversy surrounding Charlie Hebdo and Islam have been far more robust.

The paper’s issue dated November 2nd and entitled Charia Hebdo (a play on the French word for sharia), is “edited” by Muhammad, who threatens in a front-page cartoon “100 lashes if you don’t die of laughter!” Inside are dozens of satirical stories and cartoons depicting Muhammad, as well as caricatures featuring women wearing the burqa, the face-covering veil. The idea was to “celebrate” the victory of Islamists at Tunisia’s recent election, and the introduction of sharia law in Libya. Late last night, the publication’s offices in the 20th arrondissement of Paris were firebombed.

This time, French politicians have been unequivocal. François Fillon, the centre-right prime minister, not only denounced the attack, but declared that “freedom of expression is an inalienable value”. Bertrand Delanoë, the Socialist mayor of Paris, deplored the “act of violence against the freedom of expression”.

20111105_EUP506_290.jpg

In some ways, this is a straightforward issue of the right to free speech. France outlaws holocaust-denial, but otherwise protects free speech. Controversial cases often end up in court. Since it was founded 19 years ago, Charlie Hebdo’s editor told Le Monde, his paper has been sued 13 times by various Catholic organisations, offended by the depiction of Christianity—but only once by Muslim groups, which went after Charlie Hebdo over the 2006 caricature issue and lost the case.

Yet the controversy comes at a delicate time for France’s efforts to reconcile its secular tradition with the demands of its Muslim minority of some 5m, which is Europe’s biggest. France has banned the wearing of the burqa in public. It recently cracked down on Friday prayers in the streets of Paris. A permit to build a big new mosque in Marseilles has just been refused on technical grounds. Any pretext can be used these days to spread (and amplify via social media) outrage at the mere hint of Islamophobia.

Hence, presumably, the more cautious reaction today of French Muslim leaders. Mohammed Moussaoui, leader of the French Council of the Muslim Faith, an official body, condemned the attack, and stated his “profound attachment” to freedom of expression. But he also “strongly deplored the very caricatural tone” of the newspaper towards Islam.

Many Muslims will indeed find the cartoons offensive, not least because they breach a convention in Islam that the Prophet should not be depicted. But Nicolas Sarkozy, the current French president who was then interior minister, put it well in 2006 during the previous controversy: he preferred, he said, “an excess of caricature to an excess of censorship”.
France and Islam: Fighting freedom with fire | The Economist
 
.
Back
Top Bottom