Do those supporters of such protestors also support their compatriots who protest against PA's operations against the Taliban? If not, then WHY?
The question should be like this.
Do the western media exaggerate such protests against PAF operationas against Taliban that much as its done here?
There the so called term freedom of speech is applied.
Every one happy with that.
So now when they protest against british soldiers their right of free speech is suddenly forgotten.
Does free speech becomes void when they critisize british soldiers?
Is this the law?
If britishers protest against the War its free speech/expression, but when those britishers are muslims then it extremism/terrorism, then they should all be deported?
why this prejudice?
According to british law,
- A deportation order is valid only for a foreign national.
- A deportation order is valid unless deportation order does not breaches the individuals human rights or his rights under the European refugees convention
Deportation from the UK - About Immigration (UK)
Human Rights
, Freedom of speech and expression is a key aspect of it. Both are mutually inclusive.
They are british citizens not foreign nationals. Its not foreign land, according to British Law its theirs aswell. They have as much right to protest as other britishers.
Throwing them out of the country is not the solution. Its an extremist thought.
Can the deportation supporters come up with a sense and talk logic?