AlKardai
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2022
- Messages
- 2,205
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Ooooooohhhhh destroyedddAbusing folks isn't rational. Watch your posts please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ooooooohhhhh destroyedddAbusing folks isn't rational. Watch your posts please.
Where is the word Pakistan in the Quran then?
Yes, Pakistan as a political entity was established in 1947, but in comparison Iraq was established in 1932 and Egypt in 1953.
When we talk about “Ancient Iraq”, we are talking about the collective history of that land, spanning thousands of years between the River Tigris and River Euphrates (Mesopotamia).
When we talk about “Ancient Egypt”, we are talking about the collective history of that land, spanning thousands of years along the River Nile.
As such, when we talk about “Ancient Pakistan”, we are talking about the collective history of this land, spanning thousands of years along the River Indus and her tributaries (Indus Valley).
Pakistan was first used by Chaudhary Rehmat Ali in his 1933 political pamphlet “Now or Never”. In it he explained the etymology of “PAKISTAN” as being an acronym of several historic nations that would make up the country in the future. These nations were:
P – Punjab
A – “Afghania” (Gandhara, now Khyber Pakthunkhwa)
K – Kashmir (now Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan respectively)
S – Sindh
-STAN – BalochiSTAN
Punjab, Gandhara, Kashmir, Sindh and Balochistan are all regions that have been around for thousands years, some stretching back to the early Vedic civilization from roughly 1200 BCE. Each of these regions has its own rich history, languages and cultures.
Imagine thinking a religious state binds these people together. LMFAO. More like under occupation.
View attachment 926949
View attachment 926951
View attachment 926955
Pakistan ka matlab kya, La Illaha Illal AllahPAKISTAN, in the words of Ch Rehmat Ali, means the five Northern units of India, viz: Punjab, KP (Afghan Province), Kashmir, Sind, and Baluchistan."... Pakistan is a geographical entity. There is no "Islam" in it. We weren't even born Islamic. It was only in 1954 that we embarked on an experiment that would make history: we became the first nation in world history to append the adjective "Islamic" to our republican status. A hybrid was born, with the "Islamic" component gradually gaining ascendancy over the "Republican" one over time.
We broke down into smaller independent countries even WITH Islam... The secession of Bangladesh from Pakistan highlights the limitations of Islam as a unifying factor in a diverse country.
Exactly!People always talk about Muhammad Ali Jinnah but never mentioned the ideological founder of Pakistan which is Allama Iqbal. Jinnah was the best politician chosen to fulfil the dream of Allama Iqbal of a modern Islamic state. Yes JUI and others opposed Pakistan but Jamat Ulema e Pakistan supported Pakistan, they held rallies all over Pakistan in support of Pakistan. An extremist Pakistan was not their dream but a modern Islamic riasat, which promotes education, justice, protection of minorities. Only Zia ul Haq and Afghan jihad changed this, but then again who wouldn't want billions of petrodollars.
Couldn’t have explained it better.PREACH!!
These seculars of today talking shit about Iqbal and dismissing him as a reactionary, and claiming Jinnah wanted a secular Pakistan, forget Iqbal was the ideological mentor of Quaid's struggle after he ended his exile. Quaid said so himself.
Quaid was just the vehicle. The driver was Iqbal.
And anyone with a barely double digit IQ will know Iqbal was a huge proponent of Ijtehad and modern Islam.
It's a shame we barely understand the genius of Iqbal. Molvis use him for their own narrow purposes and seculars dismiss him completely.
Their breed is born munafiqs. What do you expect?Neelo Bibi, You live in Canada yourself and keep berating people for living in the West. You're a supporter of PTI. Our Glorious Leader will be shocked by your promotion of Indus Valley ethno-nationalism. Please reconsider.
BTW, I got a random mailing list email from a lady called Neelo selling real estate. Could that be you?
secular republic
So how is it secular?based on principles and teaching of Jesus
Well, it's our forum. And we Pakistanis hereby do a regime change on PDF's indian populace and install you as their leader.You must be joking.
90% of the Indians on this forum loathe me. The feeling is not entirely without reciprocation
So how is it secular?
Muslims want Pakistan to be based on the principles and teaching of Islam which Jesus PBUH followed. It’s you secularists who go against the teaching and principles of Jesus PBUH.
I will never get this logic of secular house niggers in the West (and some mental slaves whose heart is in the West but their body feels trapped in Pakistan). If you are not a completely Godless overseas Pakistani, you have no right to be in the host country.Their breed is born munafiqs. What do you expect?
They’re the same filth as Tarek Fateh but minus the open anti Pak sentiment.
You shouldn’t even call it a lady. As you know nowadays, these people are too “modern” and “progressive” to have a gender.
India is secular.Secularism doesn't mean Godless or atheism. It means state and religion are separate so that governance is impartial, without favouritism and doesn't face constant pressure from the religious right to do their bidding .
It's about creating a balance. Islamic countries like Turkey and Malaysia have much better track record on non-muslim minorities. Secular communist states? Not so much.You can argue Islam and secularism can coexist but I have my doubts.
India is secular.
Malaysia have much better track record on non-muslim minorities. Secular communist states? Not so much.
For all of its history Pakistan has been run by whiskey-drinking secular generals. I was actually told by a retired senior Air Force officer that they weed out Islamic types by making everyone drink whiskey.
So, to say that Islam has failed is not correct. It is the secular generals and corrupt politicians who have run the country into the ground.
To suggest that we need to be Christians to have justice and rule of law is nonsense. We can have both while remaining Muslim.
We don't need mullahs to run the country, just clean and honest elected leaders. That's something the whiskey generals are not allowing.
Bro, You know what's easy? Venting out frustration and anger on online forums. We all have done that at some point, haven't we? But here's the thing, it's just not fair to judge people solely based on their online behavior. I mean, let's be real, most people tend to exaggerate or act in ways they wouldn't dare to do in real life when hiding behind a screen. So, it's essential not to assume that someone's online behavior reflects their true character. In reality, people are often much more reasonable and tolerant than what they portray themselves to be online hiding behind anonymous usernames and profiles
You are correct in your doubts.You can argue Islam and secularism can coexist but I have my doubts.
Exactly! They think we’re here to be secularists and abandon our Islamic values.I will never get this logic of secular house niggers in the West (and some mental slaves whose heart is in the West but their body feels trapped in Pakistan). If you are not a completely Godless overseas Pakistani, you have no right to be in the host country.
They say things like "overseas pakistanis support sharia for Pakistan but enjoy western liberties". Like bitch, do you srsly think overseas Pakistanis are there for western liberties and not to earn a livelihood? Does the simple fact of wanting to earn a better livelihood, deprive one of the right to have an opinion?
These people ignore the Ulema who lead Pakistan’s freedom struggle. Jinnah was just a politician fighting on the political front.
Pakistan should rename itself to Indus and remove the star and crescent from the flag and become a secular republic
Ulu-ma kraaamلَّعۡنَتَ اللّٰهِ عَلَى الۡكٰذِبِيۡنَ