Again read this slowly and you may, just may understand, pls read very slooooowly - The rules which you are showing is of a particular college which came to the picture later.
First, I prefer not to go by your obviously warped imagination and blatantly Islamophobic stand in all my reactions. Don't please bother to ask me to read slowly or fast; those days of instruction are 60 years past, and when such instructions were given, they were given by a far higher class of individual than you will achieve in your entire lifetime.
Second, there are several sets of rules that have been published. There is no reason to single out one set of rules and one set of courageous observance that was curtailed under political pressure from another.
The controversy erupted when the 6 girls who have previously given an undertaking that they will adhere to 'UNIFORM' (check the dictionary if you don't understand the meaning) decided in December 2021 now they are 'Muslims' now and want to wear hijab in classroom too.
What I found in the dictionary, long before UNIFORM, was BIGOT. You might find that word worth studying. Every post of yours has reeked with hatred, nothing rational, merely hatred for the sake of hatred. It fits in well with a majority that is determined to prove itself a minority, and is determined to avenge its own unique perception of submission to an alien power by inflicting humiliation and indignity on the country's citizens.
These undertakings to adhere to UNIFORM were not violated by their wearing the hijab. That is precisely the point; the rules were changed retrospectively to allow the politicians and their pack of hounds to chivvy the girls.
For the time being they are fine with kafir men in classroom, they are fine with male teacher, they are fine with not offering 5 times namaz as classes would be then - all against Islam but by wearing hijab in classroom they will suddenly become good muslims.
This is creative hate-mongering. There is nothing to show that these further steps will follow, but that is entirely consistent with the fears and nightmares of a majority-posing-as-minority, sentiments that you have expressed with shrill venom in all your posts.
If these girls are allowed to do whatever they wish, why should then not let others do the same?
Nobody stopped anybody from wearing clothes that demonstrate their religious affiliation. It so happens that there are two difficulties: first, there is no clothing that determines religious affiliation, other than for Sikhs wearing turbans, second, none of the other children are even interested in such parochial displays. The only ones interested in such displays are the toxic mess who lead the Sangh Parivar and the BJP in the marginal state of Karnataka.
Rest you are blabbering not interested to fall to your level
You would have to ride a balloon to fall to my level.
If it helps you understand a bit more: From Karnataka HC observations
Karnataka HC also makes it clear the order on hijab was confined to such of the institutions wherein the College Development Committees have prescribed the student dress code or uniform.
The Karnataka High Court has asked for time. That did not happen by accident. It is most likely that the court decision will go against the hijab wearers, on the consistent mis-application of the ERP - the essential religious practices criterion - that the courts have converted into a manner of deciding these religious observations, and about which there have already been mentions in the posts on this theme.
The worst part is to watch strutting bravos gathered into a confidence-assuring crowd at the school and college gates, and to read their equivalents on the Internet.