The state didn't destroy any places of worship. Even under an exigent circumstance where you may allege that functionaries of the state were involved in any such actions even then that does not constitute the involvement of the Indian State itself in any such action. As sated many times before, an inability to grasp these clearly defined legalities will only lead to an indulgence in logical fallacies.
Furthermore, note the addendum to the line highlighted by you- "but if the damage is on a large scale where it becomes impossible for individuals or organisations to do the work alone then the state should intervene, flexibility in exigent circumstances is called for." If you are incapable of grasping context as much as you are unable to grasp nuance then not much can be said on the subject beyond this point.
Lastly, the state has no obligation under any existing legislature to repair temples, mosques, churches etc. Inability to understand that religion and your sentiments are of little importance in the scheme of things will lead to people engaging in logorrhoea.