What's new

Mushshak Trainer Aircraft

sitting in this plane and looking outside , will scared the Sh!t out me :fie:

anyways beautiful plane , and good to see that its getting recognition in international Air forces ..
 
.
N5njplc.jpg
Qhc41uo.jpg
kbSYFuy.jpg
Bjv0k5o.jpg
 
.
How much does it cost for other air forces as it comes with weapons drop facility tooo?
 
.
All trainer aircraft have a basic weapons load. So the presence of weapons will not affect cost.

@Manticore - How do I start a new thread?
 
. . . . .
We can build a nuke but we can't build engines ? Heck forget the military ones even the average motorcycle on our streets are without a Pakistani engine ! :argh:

This is very true but you have given an extreme case.

Pakistan need to invest in engine technology. And Pakistan do build motorcycle and car engines.
 
.
We can build a nuke but we can't build engines ? Heck forget the military ones even the average motorcycle on our streets are without a Pakistani engine ! :argh:

Hi,

That shows you how difficult it is to build an engine.
 
.
Hi,

That shows you how difficult it is to build an engine.
Not a rocket science if Pakistan is capable to built Rockt motors then it's not a big deal only you need is lot of facilities at start,some engine are being manufactured in Pakistan.
 
.
Hi,

That shows you how difficult it is to build an engine.

No it shows me that a country that can build a nuke can very easily build an engine but we're either not funneling enough resources into R&D or we're just indifferent to the whole thing. And mind you here I'm not talking about building a jet-engine....heck not even a prop-engine for the Mushak because here I'm lamenting the fact that we can't or we won't even build a damn car engine for the cars that roam our streets - it comes from Japan.

Granted that building an engine for the Jf-17 is well beyond us and perhaps even building an engine for the Mushahak maybe beyond us too but can't we even build it for our bikes and our cars ?
 
.
Granted that building an engine for the Jf-17 is well beyond us and perhaps even building an engine for the Mushahak maybe beyond us too but can't we even build it for our bikes and our cars ?
Building jet engine is tough game china alone has spent 100$billion on it but building mushak type engine is easy game but still Pakistan should go for license production for RD-93 because if Pak inducts 200+ and exports it will be huge deal.
 
.
We can build a nuke but we can't build engines ? Heck forget the military ones even the average motorcycle on our streets are without a Pakistani engine ! :argh:

to build an engine, a country needs to have a solid base in metallurgical science. As far as I know, we are light years behind in that department.
In essence, a turbine is a very simple machine. (And yes i have taken it a part) Complexity arrive when trying to make it reliable and efficient and all the while keeping it light weight.

Building jet engine is tough game china alone has spent 100$billion on it but building mushak type engine is easy game but still Pakistan should go for license production for RD-93 because if Pak inducts 200+ and exports it will be huge deal.

where did you pull that number from? $100 billion? seems far fetched brother
 
.
to build an engine, a country needs to have a solid base in metallurgical science. As far as I know, we are light years behind in that department.
In essence, a turbine is a very simple machine. (And yes i have taken it a part) Complexity arrive when trying to make it reliable and efficient and all the while keeping it light weight.

Which is precisely why I'm not expecting Pakistan to build a jet-engine or even build a prop-engine but surely building a car engine shouldn't be so utterly complex that we're still unable to do that ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom