What's new

Musharraf ruined PAF project, says ex-air chief

qsaark

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
2,638
Reaction score
0
Thursday, April 23, 2009

By Ansar Abbasi

ISLAMABAD: Former chief of the Pakistan Air Force Air Chief Marshal Saadat Kaleem has accused the ousted dictator, General Pervez Musharraf, of ruining the PAF’s $1.2 billion Saab Surveillance System deal for possible kickbacks.

Kaleem said that despite the PAF’s opposition, Musharraf put pressure on the air force to modify the contract to the extent that the number of systems to be purchased from Sweden was reduced from six to four to include two Chinese systems. The $1.2 billion contract was originally meant to acquire six surveillance systems and one Saab 2000 aircraft as VIP version from the Swedish company.

Talking to The News from his residence on phone, he said General Musharraf personally exerted pressure on him to modify the contract but he, as the PAF chief, was opposed to this because of the objections raised by the PAF experts purely on technical grounds.

He, however, said that after he retired in March 2006, the contract with the Swedish company was modified to include two Chinese systems. ìIt was done with mala fide intentions,î the former PAF chief said, adding such modifications were usually made due to some motivation factor.

He said the Pakistan Air Force had cautioned in advance that the Chinese system was inferior to the Swedish system and the two systems were incompatible. Also, one of the systems was superfluous.

This mix-up of the two different technologies, he said, was bound to create more problems instead of serving the purpose for which the project was conceived. He explained that the two systems could not be integrated so it was better to cancel the Swedish contract altogether and go for the Chinese option.

He explained that the Swedish system contained electronically scanned antenna while the Chinese system had rotating dome antenna. The former, he said, is far superior to the latter. He said that the Pakistan Air Force had initially decided to buy the Swedish system following the recommendations of its operationís branch, which was not in favour of the modification of the Swedish contract for including the Chinese technology due to technical objections.

He recalled that once General Musharraf called him to the Army House and directed to modify the contract to include two Chinese surveillance systems but when he opposed it, Musharraf snubbed him by saying, ìWhat is the problem with you?î

Kaleem said he had told Musharraf that it would be a disadvantage to have two technologies but Musharraf wanted to give a $250m contract to a Chinese company, citing ìstrategic relationsî with the friendly country. He said he had also pointed out that the PAF was already procuring defence equipment worth $6 to 7 billion from the Chinese firms, so another contract of $250 million would not make much difference.

He said that he had also argued that even if the Chinese system was provided free of cost, it would be a burden on the Pakistan Air Force because it had to train its pilots, give technical training to others and create a separate specialised team of experts to deal with it. The former air chief said that he was prepared to appear before any commission to submit what he had gone through on the issue.

The PAF had been looking for a surveillance system since long. The project called ìProject Horizonî by the PAF and negotiated between the Saab/Ericsson MW team and the Pakistani authorities continued for over two and a half years. On Oct 15, 2005, the $1.2 billion contract for six surveillance systems and one Saab 2000 aircraft as VIP version was signed. The Government of Pakistan also negotiated and signed a loan agreement with the Swedish government agency, SEK, to finance this project.

But later the number of systems to be purchased from the Swedish company were reduced from six to four following Musharrafís orders. According to a source, Saadat Kaleem favoured the Swedish company, a charge Kaleem flatly denied and insisted that the Swedish systems were the best available choice for the Pakistan Air Force.

He, however, admitted that the Saab office, situated in Islamabad, was housed in his house, rented out to the Swedish company after his retirement for $5,000 per month. When asked if this was not a clear case of conflict of interest, Kaleem said it was not, insisting that another house in his neighbourhood was rented out to a foreigner for $4,500 per month.

According to a source, a PAF officer, who was a member of the PAFís project team, was offered a lucrative salary package after his retirement by the same company, which had also created an office for the officer but the PAF refused to give the officer NoC to take up this job. Kaleem said that he was not aware of this case.

Source: Musharraf ruined PAF project, says ex-air chief
 
. .
lolz...the last couple of paragraphs do discredit the whole article preceeding it...talk about stones and glass houses...sheez..
 
.
Even keeping in mind the conflict of interest, what does he hope to achieve with this 'revelation'?

Is SAAB hoping the new government might restore the original order of 6?
 
. .
I agree that it doesn't really make sense.

My understanding of the reasons behind diversification of the AEW&C order were cost and not putting Pakistan's entire capability under a cloud in case of sanctions.
 
.
AoA
As per the article he rented the house after his retirement and the issue with Musharraf was when he was in service.Where is the conflict of interest?
 
.
I completely agree with the Air-Chief and PAF's analysis. The 2 systems are indeed incompatible.

It blows me away that Mush wanted to interfere with the contract. If China the everloving friend was SO important, why not get some other goods from it's supermarket of arms to please them?

Mush never was or is an airforce man.

As to the charges of graft, where does it NOT exist?
 
.
Ansar Abbasi look at the source - this should tell one the malafide intentions of the writer who is a sworn enemy of musharraf - tomorrow there will be a byline saying musharraf ruined the F-16 plan by reducing the purchase from 36 to 18 a/c!

needless to say, dissapointed in the former ACM!
 
.
ex-ACM Kaleem was running the Air Force, whereas ex-Gen Musharraf was running the Army and the country. There could have been a million other reasons for the insistence to buy from the Chinese which Mr. Kaleem may have been unaware of, but would have been better for Pakistan in the long run. One very obvious reason is, we need the Chinese much more than we need the Swedes, for defence and much more.

As far as I know, these misunderstandings between the services (particularly Air Force and Army) are not uncommon and are not unique to Pakistan. However, they should not be made public as they only serve to further damage the people's confidence in the way the armed forces are run.
 
Last edited:
.
oh crap i could not bellieve our president who is responsible of defending pakistan and making armed forces more powerfull he did this any way so what should now paf do i think still we had not signed deal with chinese firm for awacs we can ask again saab for 6 awacs
 
.
oh crap i could not bellieve our president who is responsible of defending pakistan and making armed forces more powerfull he did this any way so what should now paf do i think still we had not signed deal with chinese firm for awacs we can ask again saab for 6 awacs
Investing in Chinese AWACS was probably one of the best strategic decisions taken since PAF's inception and on par with if not better than investing in JF-17 and we can get sanctions on Swedish AWACS anytime.
 
.
thank you ex-ACM...thank you for "revealing" such FACTS after i guess 3 years if i am not wrong....sorry sir but if MUSHARAAF did this then i guess he should have not just been the Army chief the president but also the Air Chief Marshal because he seemed to have a vision that you seemed to be lacking!!!
 
.
ex-ACM Kaleem was running the Air Force, whereas ex-Gen Musharraf was running the Army and the country. There could have been a million other reasons for the insistence to buy from the Chinese which Mr. Kaleem may have been unaware of, but would have been better for Pakistan in the long run. One very obvious reason is, we need the Chinese much more than we need the Swedes, for defence and much more.

As far as I know, these misunderstandings between the services (particularly Air Force and Army) are not uncommon and are not unique to Pakistan. However, they should not be made public as they only serve to further damage the people's confidence in the way the armed forces are run.

I m in 100% agreement with you!!:cheers:
 
.
It's a shame that the thread has been labeled as it is. The thread should be renamed, something not a lie as the title of the thread suggests.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom