During the era of which Leader...did Pakistan prosper in the majority of departments despite of that era being the one in which 9/11 took place and U.S went to hunt down the world.
As a Pakistani..I care for those people who improved the image of Pakistan, (or atleast tried and succeeded mostly), while also dramatically improving the economic,political condition of the country.
In other words, a DELIVERING leader and the one who is neither a feudal nor has he ever tried to shine his politics by putting the country at stake.
We can all talk about how legally or illegaly a person came into power, one things for sure, no matter whoever has come to power, has come with the nations "yes" nod..whether it was NS, BB , Musharraf or Zardari.. so blaming the arrival of a ruler solely on him is a big hypocrisy.
Did anyone of Ganja or Mr.10% had ever been able to give Pakistan so much? Are they saints? Don't they have proven corruption chargers against them? Had not Pakistan became a defaulted state because of THEM and during THERE, era? Was media liberated during their times? Was not the constitution broken by these leeches?
Was SC building not attacked by the mob of one of these thugs?
Compare the welfare, wellbeing and prosperity of the people and the country during NS and BB's tenure with Musharraf's and tell me here who has done better.
This should not even have been a question in 2009, but unfortunately our already half-illiterate nation has been so thoroughly brainwashed that there doesnt seem a way back no matter how clearly the matters lie in front of everyone. And when I say Half-illiterate, Id ont mean to undermin or proudly say this, but in an effort to try to state facts and then talk in their lights, whether they are bitter or sweet.
As a Pakistani..I care for those people who improved the image of Pakistan, (or atleast tried and succeeded mostly), while also dramatically improving the economic,political condition of the country.
In other words, a DELIVERING leader and the one who is neither a feudal nor has he ever tried to shine his politics by putting the country at stake.
We can all talk about how legally or illegaly a person came into power, one things for sure, no matter whoever has come to power, has come with the nations "yes" nod..whether it was NS, BB , Musharraf or Zardari.. so blaming the arrival of a ruler solely on him is a big hypocrisy.
Did anyone of Ganja or Mr.10% had ever been able to give Pakistan so much? Are they saints? Don't they have proven corruption chargers against them? Had not Pakistan became a defaulted state because of THEM and during THERE, era? Was media liberated during their times? Was not the constitution broken by these leeches?
Was SC building not attacked by the mob of one of these thugs?
Compare the welfare, wellbeing and prosperity of the people and the country during NS and BB's tenure with Musharraf's and tell me here who has done better.
This should not even have been a question in 2009, but unfortunately our already half-illiterate nation has been so thoroughly brainwashed that there doesnt seem a way back no matter how clearly the matters lie in front of everyone. And when I say Half-illiterate, Id ont mean to undermin or proudly say this, but in an effort to try to state facts and then talk in their lights, whether they are bitter or sweet.
