For the love of the heavens above!!!
The rajputs, and I am really sorry to hurt your feelings if you are a rajput, did not resist the Mughals. Some kingdoms, some not all, like Mewar and Ranthambore tried to resist the Mughals for a brief period. Others submitted immediately when demanded. Mewar was crushed first after the fall of chittor and Rao Surjan Hada of Ranthambore surrendered his fort after he lost the battle.
From the time of Jahangir onwards there was no independent rajput kingdom or rajput resistance.
WRONG AGAIN.
Aurangzeb tried to install a Muslim king on the throne of Mewar after Rana Jaswant Singh Died.
This enraged the Rathors and the other Rajputs. Later when Ajjt Singh was born, the Rajputs asked Aurangzeb to install him as king of Mewar. Auragzeb refused and tried to have the baby Ajit Singh assassinated.
After this the Rajputs fought for 30 years against Auragzeb
This rebellion united the Rajput clans, and a triple-pronged alliance was formed by the states of Marwar, Mewar and jaipur. One of the conditions of this alliance was that the rulers of Jodhpur and Jaipur should regain the privilege of marriage with the ruling Sesodia dynasty of Mewar, on the understanding that the offspring of Sesodia princesses should succeed to the throne over any other offspring.
The Sikhs started as a religious movement not a military one. Ironically it was the active persecution of Sikhs by the Mughals and also their Hindu allies/auxiliaries that prompted Guru Hargobind Singh to form a military sect. The Sikh Gurus did fight the Mughals and at the time of Ranjit Singh the Mughals would tremble at the sight of the Sikhs, that is also true.
But make no mistake that the Sikhs also had to fight many north Indian Hindu kings who openly supported the Mughals.
No, the sikhs took Refuge in Hindu kingdom when they were on the run from Mughal persecutions. In fact, before the second Maratha Anglo war, teh Sikhs used to pay tribute to the Marathas.
The Marathas under the peshwas attacked Mughals. Shivaji and Sambhaji fought bravely but they could not take the attack to Agra or Delhi. It was the Peshwa confederacy which invaded Delhi AFTER the death of Aurangzeb. And yes, the Marathas also dominated the Mughals MUCH LATER.
So what ? Aurangzeb tried his best to eliminate Shivaji, only to find Shivaji establish an Empire that destroyed Aurangzeb's own empire.
The Assamese or more specifically the Ahoms did not have a long history of war against the Mughals. During the reign of Aurangzeb he sent his Mughal commander to subdue the Ahom kingdom. The Mughals were routed, but there were no further conflicts. The Mughals did not attack again and the Ahoms did not pursue Mughals.
The Ahom's who were HINDUS fought against the Muslim Empire. How is that not a resistance to a cultural and religions invasion ?
These "resistance" movements as you call were not synchronised and not all happened at the same time. These were individual incidents and there was no co-ordination or unity among the native rulers. I would seriously not put the rajputs in any resistance movement. Because according to history, not me, they did not fight.
Not True. The Very fact that a Rajput Ram Singh helped Shivaji escape from Mughal court, helped Sikh Guru escape fro Mughal court and formed a peace treaty with the Ahome king shows there was more to it. Clearly a resistance to tyranny.
India is NOT a Hindu country. And whether you like it or not it will NEVER be a Hindu country.
India WAS, IS and WILL ALWAYS remain a Hindu country. And whether you like it or not, IT WILL ALWAYS be so.