Indianpatriot1
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
- Messages
- 549
- Reaction score
- 0
You are exaggerating her thesis but she was right however.
All the evidence is on her side. Calling the era of Muslim rule "The worst in history. Dark age imposed by those "outsider" blah blah) is easy and convenient as it goes well with the hindu nationalism of indians..but this was just not the reality. Auragzeb was neither a hindu hater bigot, nor some really ultra pious Islamic role model...he was something in between..My studies have shown Aurganzeb in a completely different manner (not any of those two commonly known portrayals of him)...
Of course he was. You dont break thousands of temple just to prove a political point. Hindus is the gangetic plains were no politcal threat, then why do it? And people like Romila Thapar wont even mention these well documented facts while going ga-ga over the evolution of Thumri and Khayal.
Such people have it coming when Modi becomes PM.