MODP Year Book 2017-18

[waqasmwi]

Specs:
1 Missile can sink a Aircraft Carrier ....

Advantage:
It can sink an air craft carrier

Other benefits:
The sunk Aircraft carrier make a nice fish reef under water for scuba divers to explore

Sinking an Aircraft Carrier is no joke

 

[The Accountant]

Sinking an Aircraft Carrier is no joke

Why do u think that ? How it is going to defend against a suoersonic mach 4 missile when it is not designed to take on ?

 

[Riz]

Damn, and i had it all sitting in my files for several days....fearing to post all the information.

It is all over on Twitter since yesterday.. U are getting too late & lazy windi..

Anyways i thought CM-400 is antiship missile but this version is Air to ground

 

[Sine Nomine]

Oh well.
So we have purchased another AEW&C aircraft.
And the most interesting revelation is the price of CM 400 AKG compared to the so called ingenious Brahmos.

We need more CM 400 AKG,a lot of them.

 

[The Eagle]

Sir any news about completion date / Launching date of FAC-4 ??? as its steel was cut in december 2016 n Keel was laid in March 2017 . dont u think it took alot of time ???

Not that much considering the indigenous factor as well as having an improved version of Harbah Missile System. However, most of the work is done and is in last phase to completion.

 

[Foxtrot Delta]

Interesting stuff.... Good thing they didn't disclose too much of the new equipment.... Leave some surprises for the battlefield plz

 

[Pakistan Ka Beta]

both are different radars for different use

little explaination would be helpful . i dont know about radars 2 much but Thank u brother .

Not that much considering the indigenous factor as well as having an improved version of Harbah Missile System. However, most of the work is done and is in last phase to completion.

Thank u brother .

 

[HRK]

little explaination would be helpful . i dont know about radars 2 much but Thank u brother .


Thank u brother .

dear plz use Google or even this forum you will have all the information about these TPS-77 MRR and YLC 18 radars for start read following links
- https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/tps-77-multi-role-radar-system.629580/

- https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-u...-its-first-multi-role-surveillance-radar.html

- https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-IADS-Radars.html#mozTocId486275

 

[Haris Ali2140]

dear plz use Google or even this forum you will have all the information about these TPS-77 MRR and YLC 18 radars for start read following links
- https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/tps-77-multi-role-radar-system.629580/

- https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-u...-its-first-multi-role-surveillance-radar.html

- https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-IADS-Radars.html#mozTocId486275

Does TPS-77MRR has ability to detect low flying objects like YLC-18?

 

[HRK]

Does TPS-77MRR has ability to detect low flying objects like YLC-18?

yes .....

BTW it was mention in the very first link in my post, so I would request you to read the posted links ....

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

VIPER seem a practical solution based on in-house industrial capabilities which most probably will match with Pakistan's terrain and environment as well, as Pakistan is manufacturing and using M113 series from quite some time, at this stage we can assume based of official information that it was the only prototype which was shown in IDEAS-2018, so it might be still in development phase.

Ukraine might offer BMP series or some new derivative in which PA seems not interested, even it was reported that in trials for the selection of Turret for VIPER PA rejected BMP series Turret. Based on modular armour concept which VIPER IFV use it may provide better protection and maintainability as compare to BMP series, only thing in which VIPER lack behind BMP-3 is power/weight ratio otherwise comparable or excel in other parameters.

Same is the case with Turkish Tulpar IFV as it weight up to 42 tonnes powered by 850 hp engine, almost as heavy as Al-Zarar tanks of PA and does not carry anti-tank missiles, so it appears Tulpar is produced to address needs and employment concept much different than PA

We need heavy armour too.
Ive seen of videos of our M-113s being blown apart. That thing cant withstand something over 12.7mm at max.

This “MIFV” is the same thing as “PIFV” from the 90s. Just added a better turret & newer APC variant.

Additional armour is definitely required.

 

[Sulman Badshah]

You keep forgetting this:

View attachment 579026

Those are 2 Russian Kornets.

These are 9M113 Konkurs ... BS is also integerateable as well with VIPER ..
don't know about Kornet integration yet

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

These are 9M113 Konkurs ... BS is also integerateable as well with VIPER ..
don't know about Kornet integration yet

We need a new gen generation fire & forget ATGM.

 

[Sine Nomine]

We need heavy armour too.
Ive seen of videos of our M-113s being blown apart. That thing cant withstand something over 12.7mm at max.

This “MIFV” is the same thing as “PIFV” from the 90s. Just added a better turret & newer APC variant.

Additional armour is definitely required.

M113's are useless according to US by new threat standards.
That's why they brought Bradley M2/3 in picture.

 

[HRK]

We need heavy armour too.
Ive seen of videos of our M-113s being blown apart. That thing cant withstand something over 12.7mm at max.

This “MIFV” is the same thing as “PIFV” from the 90s. Just added a better turret & newer APC variant.

Additional armour is definitely required.

But I think it will not be used as front line charging asset specially in Mechanise Infantry div. VIPER will be operated along with Armoured Regiments, so there are less chances for VIPER to come under heavy attack ....

hopfuly @Signalian might comment better