What's new

Modi to PM: Don’t even think of giving Sir creek to Pakistan

. . .
wow, pakistani kashmir was taken by pakistanis, not handed over to us by india :lol:

it was us who handed you the lashmir in platter because of our traitor army chief that time which was a brit




Ever heard of 'Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel'??? If he would have handled K issue, there won't be any K issue. It was Mr Nehru who took K issue in his hand to appease Muslims...

Menon(Second Leuinant of Sardar) remember "Nehru was so angry on Sardar the way sardar handling Muslim issue, He branded Sardar communal. When Sardar Died, Nehru prohibited Civil servant to attend his funeral, I managed money and asked Civil servant to attend Sardar's funeral".

In later days Nehru stopped speaking with Sardar. Nehru went united nation without consulting Deputy PM (Home Minister) Patel. This step hurt India most, and will hurt India till Pakistan is there...


His words are proving right..
 
.
He is hero of india and taliban khan is zero is front of him :whistle:

So yes you support a terrorist and now claiming other Indians support him to plus you are right Khan and Modi arent in the same league. Modi is a well known terrorist and will do any thing for a vote while Imran khans is a descent man and playing the game fairly not trying to create sectarian tensions and calling on the religious bigots like yourself.

Ever heard of 'Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel'??? If he would have handled K issue, there won't be any K issue. It was Mr Nehru who took K issue in his hand to appease Muslims...

Menon(Second Leuinant of Sardar) remember "Nehru was so angry on Sardar the way sardar handling Muslim issue, He branded Sardar communal. When Sardar Died, Nehru prohibited Civil servant to attend his funeral, I managed money and asked Civil servant to attend Sardar's funeral".

In later days Nehru stopped speaking with Sardar. Nehru went united nation without consulting Deputy PM (Home Minister) Patel. This step hurt India most, and will hurt India till Pakistan is there...


His words are proving right..

No matter what you do don't answer to the little voices in your head :rofl:
 
.
.

Menon(Second Leuinant of Sardar) remember "Nehru was so angry on Sardar the way sardar handling Muslim issue, He branded Sardar communal. When Sardar Died, Nehru prohibited Civil servant to attend his funeral, I managed money and asked Civil servant to attend Sardar's funeral".

In later days Nehru stopped speaking with Sardar. Nehru went united nation without consulting Deputy PM (Home Minister) Patel. This step hurt India most, and will hurt India till Pakistan is there...



His words are proving right..

Don't buy everything that is said. It only reflects a pre existing bias of the persons concerned. While Nehru & Patel did have differences & serious ones at that, it is still difficult to believe that either would have been petty. Nehru did come to the airport to see Patel off on what would become his last journey to Mumbai and attended his funeral when he died. The link below should give you a different picture of how people with severe differences can still manage to be perfectly civil.

Matter of integrity: When Nehru & Patel competed over sacrifice
 
.
I dont know who this guy is, but muslim extremists seem to hate him. Good sign.
 
. . .
A terrorist , a mass morder enjoying his live in India as stat leader.
 
. . . .
Sir Creek is slowly moving into Sindh. All Pakistan needs to do is hold its grounds on the GPS coordinates it holds today and nature will resolve this matter in a few decades.

For the same reason, Pakistan can't give Sir Creek to India since Sir Creek is moving into Pakistan. So technically it makes sense to give Sir Creek to Pakistan. IF we give it to India then nature would keep giving them parts of Pakistani territory.

The small miniscule fishing Benefit that is possible isn't happening since the fishermen get arrested. Anyway, fishing is not possible there except on exceptionally high tide days.

You are right. That is why its important/better for India to solve it as soon as possible.

You are wrong on saying that Sir Creek if given to India would mean India keeps getting Pakistani territory. Now, territories are defined by GPS coordinates of the existing frontier. So (assume) if India gets Sir Creek, then the India will get the area of Sir Creek till a particular coordinate. If Sir Creek keeps moving towards Pakistan, the borders will not change, only the landscape of the border will change. It will still remain at that Coordinate.

This has been one of the issues we have encountered on the Bangladesh border. Since in most places the border was defined as the middle of a river, and the rivers in that region are very very volatile, they keep changing course every year! So there was constant bad blood between India and BD over it, since every year some side lost land to the other. This is the mechanism that has been evolved now with BD. The process is going on to demarcate it nowadays.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom