Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fact is ,if there is substantial proof against modi,he should be tried.Investigative agencies under direct control of congress havent been able to prove modi guilty,recently he was relieved in the ishrat jahan case.You aren't reading the posts- I said Sajjan Kumar has not been convicted, but we know that he is guilty, therefore trying to claim that Modi is innocent just because he hasn't been convicted is stupid. In our country there are a hundred ways of avoiding conviction and getting away with murder.
Its not that a politician after wearing a skull cap becomes secular but if a politician doesn't mind wearing mukuts, tilaks and all other things which are symbolically Hindu but has a problem wearing a skull cap it does ring a bell...
Not everyone, I don't expect politicians who thrives on vote bank of one particular community to show these kind of gestures...
Cause wearing certain attire is his personal choice, and right. It should not matter what his attire is, rather his actions.
Indeed it is one's personal choice...
If the politicians deliver the development to people irrespective of any difference then there is no need for these gestures .
The one who want to resort to these gesture are the ones who cannot deliver any progress instead want to be in power using vote-bank politics.
Not everyone, I don't expect politicians who thrives on vote bank of one particular community to show these kind of gestures...
Than what was your point?
Can MIM or its leaders of hyderabad wear Tilak?Don't tell me MIM is communal its part of alliance of secular parties and UPA
Then again,How is wearing a cap synonymous with representing you? So if a good for nothing who represents you wears a cap for you in international front?He/She automatically becomes good?
When Queen Elizabeth doesn't mind listening to reciting of Holy Quran or Obama visiting a mosque just for symbolism then why is wearing a skull cap a problem for Modi. Though I would say it is his personal choice but don't you think an aspiring national leader should have worn it atleast for symbolism..
If You want a logical answer then you need to have a logical explanation, you cannot throw away the cause and out of window and simply blame the effect.An example would be if you did a chemistry experiment you know what you add and what you get in the end as result Likewise same here.
So, it doesn't matter who started it because those who started it are all innocent(CAUSE) and those in the end are guilty (EFFECT).
You call it a stupid question because you don't like to say what caused it as it embarrass you isn't it?, why not tell us what led to it? When we read history we read what started a movement or a certain incident and later what it spiralled into isn't it?
Be it Freedom struggle of INDIA or Partition of India. You cannot take away the cause and only show the effect ( as it suits your case).
'What started the riot' is a stupid question.
I am not expecting Baba Ramdev or Sri Sri Ravi Shankar to wear a skull cap but a politician who is to govern me and represent me in the international front...