Missiles: Who gave Pakistan MIRV technology?

[Taimoor Khan]

And I have a Pakistani who believes it. Indian media sure did convince you, which is exactly we want.

Indian media is not for anyone convincing in Pakistan, it's for you rats to argue and cat fight amongst yourselves.

On side note, did your establishment muster up courage and test missile from the sub?

 

[Chhatrapati]

look troll @Chhatrapati
The missile's range was from 600 to 5,000 kilometres (370 to 3,110 mi) initially

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSD-10_Pioneer

you're a perfect troller @Chhatrapati

hahaha, it's fun to watch you getting triggered by your own mistakes.

Go read back my comments? The missile range is 5000+Km. And they have demonstrated the MIRV tech, usually a country who can launch multiple satellite into space, can simply develop MIRV missiles, that's something even the North Koreans couldn't do right.

Point being, the Russians cannot launch an MIRV tipped missile into the range of 600Km, with decreasing range the IRBM got to have independently boosted nukes unlike ones in ICBM where the height and low drag flight is really an advantage. So, you'll have to add more weight to the whole missile and make the top even larger to fit liquid fuel rocket for individual vehicles. So, the Chance of Russians firing an IRBM in the range of 600 or even 2000 KM is zero. Now Pakistan, meh! I got to see it to believe it. How they managed to pull off something like that with a missile of intermediate range, without any know how on orbit injection.

Indian media is not for anyone convincing in Pakistan, it's for you rats to argue and cat fight amongst yourselves.

On side note, did your establishment muster up courage and test missile from the sub?

It looks like you're the one arguing with me over it. You said you don't believe any missile launches without any credible video evidence, I'm with you on that, I too don't believe it. That's why I asked if you have any video with you & others, launching an MIRV. But, I got replies from Pakistanis like, PA don't have good cameras, they "forgot" to shot video. You says it's Indian media saying so I should ask them. So dodgy about it, wonder why.

 

[Cool_Soldier]

Ababeel Missile look like longer range compared to mentioned range of 2700 km.
To me, it is probably around 4000k with of course MIRV tech carrying at least 3-5 ward heads.

 

[Vapnope]

I shot the wrong dodo, this is not directed at you. It's for Mr. Evidence guy TK.

It's for everyone claiming things here you are no exception.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

It looks like you're the one arguing with me over it. You said you don't believe any missile launches without any credible video evidence, I'm with you on that, I too don't believe it. That's why I asked if you have any video with you & others, launching an MIRV. But, I got replies from Pakistanis like, PA don't have good cameras, they "forgot" to shot video. You says it's Indian media saying so I should ask them. So dodgy about it, wonder why.

Look, it a very simple argument. All we need is the LAUNCH of missile, leaving the sea surface, thats about it (without any pontoons). Surely, thats not a big deal! No body is asking to show camera on how the missile is flying in space or separation of warhead or even target getting hit. Surely, your establishment can capture that, its a bloody launch of the missile! Not something you havent done before, hell, you even release the video of same missile launch albeit with pontoons! At the moment, the launch of missile from your sub only exisit in the news papers.

 

[Ultima Thule]

hahaha, it's fun to watch you getting triggered by your own mistakes.

Go read back my comments? The missile range is 5000+Km. And they have demonstrated the MIRV tech, usually a country who can launch multiple satellite into space, can simply develop MIRV missiles, that's something even the North Koreans couldn't do right.

Point being, the Russians cannot launch an MIRV tipped missile into the range of 600Km, with decreasing range the IRBM got to have independently boosted nukes unlike ones in ICBM where the height and low drag flight is really an advantage. So, you'll have to add more weight to the whole missile and make the top even larger to fit liquid fuel rocket for individual vehicles. So, the Chance of Russians firing an IRBM in the range of 600 or even 2000 KM is zero. Now Pakistan, meh! I got to see it to believe it. How they managed to pull off something like that with a missile of intermediate range, without any know how on orbit injection.

Now you're confirmed troll, you don't know basics/difference of BM flight and space flight,SS-10 had variable range to deter whole EU 5000 km is useless for EU, to hit anywhere in EU maximum 3500 km range is enough, 5000 km range still consider an IRBM 5500 km and above consider ICBM, i already told you 5000 km with a single warhead or reentry vehicle and launching multiple satellites is whole different ball game than MIRV, BM including ICBM can't reach orbits but only can reach suborbital altitudes, go do some research before you post @Chhatrapati

 

[Chhatrapati]

Look, it a very simple argument. All we need is the LAUNCH of missile, leaving the sea surface, thats about it (without any pontoons). Surely, thats not a big deal!

I can launch a sounding rocket with a dome tip, and say, hey, I have an MIRV missile. It travels for some 2000+Km, no time for even reaching height to launch MIRVs, but somehow you pulled it off.

Pontoons are just fine, as it mimics exactly how a Missile is launched from a submarine with the exact parameters, you just don't run a sub and waste time and money over it. I don't know why you think pontoons are a joke. Probably out of ignorance, it's always fun to shoot while driving a cab and not stationary. Is that it? The technology, research and patents we file are unfathomable for you. It's not easy as developing a nuke.

Now you're confirmed troll, you don't know basics/difference of BM flight and space flight,SS-10 had variable range to deter whole EU 5000 km is useless for EU, to hit anywhere in EU maximum 3500 km range is enough, 5000 km range still consider an IRBM 5500 km and above consider ICBM, i already told you 5000 km with a single warhead or reentry vehicle and launching multiple satellites is whole different ball game than MIRV

Here comes more jokes. Did I say anything about a spaceflight? You even read my comments or stroll through it and pick words. Dude you're losing it, every time I come up to see what you have quoted me for, it's silly excuses to justify your stupid comments you said before. And the Russian SS has a range of 5500 KM, given most details about it are classified, so your assumptions like it can travel only 2000 Km with 3 war heads is called your own ideas. I'm guessing it's not an IRBM at all. Anyway, I don't care what Russians build it for to deter Europe or to have a christmas party, what I'm talking is the parameters on how the Russians developed a BM with MIRV and have showed they could launch it.
You on the other hand have claimed it, given no country have managed to pull that off at a short range and the shortcomings of having a short range missile, such as low energy and need for secondary boosters for the MIRV's. I think your launch is horseshit. Simple as that, now stop quoting me, I'm sure you can't resist the itch so, I'll just pass this time. Adios

It's for everyone claiming things here you are no exception.

You're welcome.

 

[GumNaam]

why does anyone care if indians believe we have MiRVs or not. if they don't believe that we have MiRVs then . they'll find out the hard way, simple as that.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Here comes more jokes. Did I say anything about a spaceflight? You even read my comments or stroll through it and pick words. Dude you're losing it, every time I come up to see what you have quoted me for, it's silly excuses to justify your stupid comments you said before. And the Russian SS has a range of 5500 KM, given most details about it are classified, so your assumptions like it can travel only 2000 Km with 3 war heads is called your own ideas. I'm guessing it's not an IRBM at all. Anyway, I don't care what Russians build it for to deter Europe or to have a christmas party, what I'm talking is the parameters on how the Russians developed a BM with MIRV and have showed they could launch it.
You on the other hand have claimed it, given no country have managed to pull that off at a short range and the shortcomings of having a short range missile, such as low energy and need for secondary boosters for the MIRV's. I think your launch is horseshit. Simple as that, now stop quoting me, I'm sure you can't resist the itch so, I'll just pass this time. Adios

now that's call a troll, you know nothing kid but troll, its possible to develop MRBM with MIRV with current tech aerospace advances and as for your information ababeel upper stage is liquid fuel for high specific impulses to gain energy momentum in suborbital flight, and why you comparing multiple satellite injection in orbit and MIRV???, go bark somewhere else you troll/paranoid @Chhatrapati