Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
An inter-collegiate/inter-University debate contest. Title of the debate: Jihad, in the light of Surah Al-Anfal.
Than it gives the name of the guest of honor, the date, and the venue, and the name of the organizers etc.
What I fail to understand is, why people are getting knee-jerk response?
Nothing wrong with the debate neither the topic.
and its not a knee-jerk response because what is wrong is
"The speech competition will be chaired by Maulana Masood Azhar, a notorious militant leader in Pakistan, while ex-guerilla commander Mufti Muhammad Asghar Khan Kashmiri will be the chief guest of the ceremony."
Jihad (the translation 'holy war' is incorrect) is one (but not the only) of the pillars of Islam. There are clear guidelines given in Quran on when one should go for Jihad and how it should be conducted. Surah Al-Anfal discusses the ethics of Jihad.
Just for the sake of clearance, Jihad bil-saif (where a Muslim fights with weapons) can only be declared by an Islamic state i.e. the government, and not by the individual groups.
I have studied Quran and i know what it is also know its not what the world or extremists organisations are saying.
I just mentioned that this is an inter-collegiate/inter university debate contest on the ethics of Jihad, in the light of surah al-Anfal. Where did the politics come in this? Were you there? Did you listen to what was discussed in that gathering? Did you find something incorrect about it?
Where do the scholarly debates take place? on the roadside? If University campuses are not the right venue then where should one discuss debatable matters?
You are assuming that the debaters would be chanting slogans such as 'crush India, crush USA, crush infidels' but it is only an assumption, because you have not heard it, you were not there!
The objection is not over the debate/neither the topic.
The objection is over the notorious organizers aka players who are NOT at all welcomed keeping in view their political as well as other background