What's new

Microsoft’s default font is at the center of a government corruption case

.
https://www.geo.tv/latest/149222-extremely-unlikely-calibri-used-in-feb-2006-says-font-creator

The "number 1" used in the document was from the later version of Calibri and not the old version available when the document was allegedly created. I believe, the Annexure K of Part 3 has these details but it I believe it has not been made public yet.

Sir, MS Word 2010 still uses the old version.

CalibriVersions.jpg
 
. .
The Calibiri font was available in 2004. The original ver 0.90 was still in use in MS Word 2010:

View attachment 411093
LMAO 2004 is the date of the copyright NOT the date of font's availability to the public. Your work is entitled for a copyright as soon as it takes a tangible form, which by no means translates to its availability for public use.

Calibri designer told Dawn News that he started designing the font in 2004. You see the year 2004 against the copyright notice because the font became "tangible work" and thus entitled for a copyright notice for Microsoft long before it'd be fit for public use.

In a development environment, developers get copyright protection for Alpha versions of their products all the time because they need it. There are examples of companies stealing one developer's half finished work and hiring another to build on it.

I've been building a website for a comedian from Wales for three months and despite it not being open to the public, I've placed a copyright notice in the footer because I need to protect the code even from those who have early access to it (his friends and my potential future clients).

Conclusion: 2004
is the year the designer started designing Calibri version 0.90 and got it copyrighted.


jj.jpg


=======

wese haddd hai.. concrete se b barhh k ho. :lol:
=============

Bhai jaan ne poori future dekh daali hai :lol::lol::lol:
sab se concrete admi hai pdf pe ye banda
door door tak IT ki cheezon se iska koi wasta ni... aur verdict dekho iskay.
syasat, mazhab, science, defence, computers, tech...har cheez pe verdict deta hai aur poori dhitai se.
 
Last edited:
.
The printed document has the NEW version which wasn't available. Stop defending the undefendable.

The images I posted above is straight from Microsoft. What I have said is correct. That is why the font designer admits that it was possible to use the font at the time the document was written. Please read his own words if you still choose not to believe this as given in several posts here on PDF.
 
.
LMAO 2004 is the date of the copyright NOT the date of font's availability to the public. Your work is entitled for a copyright as soon as it takes a tangible form, which by no means translates to its availability for public use.

Calibri designer told Dawn News that he started designing the font in 2004. You see the year 2004 against the copyright notice because the font became "tangible work" and thus entitled for a copyright notice for Microsoft long before it'd be fit for public use.

In a development environment, developers get copyright protection for Alpha versions of their products all the time because they need it. There are examples of companies stealing one developer's half finished work and hiring another to build on it.

I've been building a website for a comedian from Wales for three months and despite it not being open to the public, I've placed a copyright notice in the footer because I need to protect the code even from those who have early access to it (his friends and my potential future clients).

Conclusion: 2004
is the year the designer started designing Calibri version 0.90 and got it copyrighted.


View attachment 411143

=======

wese haddd hai.. concrete se b barhh k ho. :lol:
=============


sab se concrete admi hai pdf pe ye banda
door door tak IT ki cheezon se iska koi wasta ni... aur verdict dekho iskay.
syasat, mazhab, science, defence, computers, tech...har cheez pe verdict deta hai aur poori dhitai se.

Patwari ko rozi rote karny do bhi , yeh nahi manay ga.
 
. .
Patwari ko rozi rote karny do bhi , yeh nahi manay ga.
meri post se microsoft ki website ka screenshot dekh k microsoft ki website pe gya aur ab dekho kesay zaheen ban ra hai... "straight from Microsoft"... :rofl:

:sarcastic:he will say look at my signature and then what will you say?
dil ki tasalli k leay ye signature lgaya hva hai shoday ne :lol:
 
. . .
I am afraid of this as well, but I want to believe in miracles, some kind of "Peaceful Miracle".

Miracles comes more easily to those who work hard to create them, Sir.
 
. . .
The images I posted above is straight from Microsoft. What I have said is correct. That is why the font designer admits that it was possible to use the font at the time the document was written. Please read his own words if you still choose not to believe this as given in several posts here on PDF.
by justifying the use of font we are actually denying an expert opinion from UK (handwriting and Documents). As of my information n UK an expert witness is only authorised by the court. To achieve this status of expert witness people have to go a thorough scrutiny.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom