What's new

Mi 25 attack helicopter gifted by India to Afghanistan reaches Kabul, 3 more to follow

Makes you wonder why NATO's occupation of Afghanistan failed so miserably as well.
How did NATO occupation of Afghanistan failed miserably
  • NATO was not meant for the occupation of the Afghanistan
  • NATO objective to dislodge Taliban --- Yes
  • NATO objective to Kill Osama bin Laden --- Yes
  • US led NATO objective to showcase its weapons for export --- Yes
  • US led NATO objective to get major deals disguissed as the rebuilding effort --- Yes
  • NATO objective to show the supremacy of the USA ---- Yes
 
How did NATO occupation of Afghanistan failed miserably
  • NATO was not meant for the occupation of the Afghanistan
  • NATO objective to dislodge Taliban --- Yes
  • NATO objective to Kill Osama bin Laden --- Yes
  • US led NATO objective to showcase its weapons for export --- Yes
  • US led NATO objective to get major deals disguissed as the rebuilding effort --- Yes
  • NATO objective to show the supremacy of the USA ---- Yes
How innocent you are. ........ YES
 
LOLZ just one line for you
SUBHAY HO GAYI HAI MAMMU, AB UTH JA PYARE !!

I was shocked by your "analysis" of "achievements" of NATO in Afghanistan. You should convey your thoughts to international media, Bush & Obama will be relieved to know how much great "achievements" they have achieved in Afghanistan ......
 
How innocent you are. ........ YES
time of imperelism is over now wars are done for strategic gains and testing /advertisng new equipment and latest training and WOT was done for that ,
And if US-Iran deal goes thru then forget any support from USA UK & NATO nations to pakistan as in past .
USA/NATO was never in Afghanistan to control it what it achieved from WOT your nation will take a decade if not more to understand that .
But bright side is you have a window of almost a decade to re energise and reconstruct your economy and its dependence on UK USA & West but only if your nation permits the afghans to manage there internal affairs the way they want else it will be the biggest blunder in history of your nation .
 
Last edited:
Fixed wings too. Garuds and Marcos on rotational basis for base protection. However, SG and some assault teams of SF are embedded.
MARCOs aren't going to be used as force protection and the Garuds do not handle this reguarly either. If they are deployed it is for far more agressive missions than base protection- the Afghans can handle that, SFs will do something very different.
 
MARCOs aren't going to be used as force protection and the Garuds do not handle this reguarly either. If they are deployed it is for far more agressive missions than base protection- the Afghans can handle that, SFs will do something very different.

Last I checked, MARCOS were on base duties in general vicinity (Int/Counter-Int missions). Also Garuds are narrowed as of now. More the domain of VIKAS till date. Additionally if any present, then its deputation/cross attachments. The cross attachments have increased lately(something to do with Integrated Special Forces Command?) ... let's see

Op Role for MARCOS primarily still remains general area Badipore - Wular - Lolab. Combat exposure rotation of 6 months being done there.
 
Nothing could stop Afghan Taliban to take over whole Afghanistan...
Well NATO airforce is stopping them. The Afghan Taliban cannot take over and HOLD more territory. Watch Anatol Lieven.
 
Last edited:
It is outdated ? :lol: Then why did you request Russia to sell you some of them ?
We buying MI 35 with brand new airframe cocpit emweapons etc

U r giving them soviet era MI 25

MASSIVE DIFFERENCE just go to wiki u get the difference
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom