What's new

Member hussain0216's obsession with India explained

. .
Member hussain0216's obsession with India explained:
His grandmother likely converted the same way little Hindu girls are converted in Pakistan till today.
If situation today is so worse, you can just imagine what it was like a hundred or two hundred years ago.
 
. . .
His grandmother likely converted the same way little Hindu girls are converted in Pakistan till today.
If situation today is so worse, you can just imagine what it was like a hundred or two hundred years ago.

She like millions of us saw a better superior faith, adopted Islam and lived as a good Muslim women and died a faithful Muslim
 
.
Member hussain0216's obsession with India explained:
Whatever his obsession with India, it cannot possibly beat your and other Indians' obsession with Pakistan. Even after co-opting the Napak sepoys and rendering Pakistan isolated and irrelevant internationally you lot just can't let it go. There's more of you lot here on Pakistani forum obsessing over every aspect of Pakistani culture, politics, military and economy than the other way around.
 
.
She like millions of us saw a better superior faith, adopted Islam and lived as a good Muslim women and died a faithful Muslim
This is exactly the same alibi that's given for little girls being converted to Islam even today in Pakistan.
 
. .
Indians shouldn't cope about what he says about religion to be honest, Islam is objectively superior to Hindusim, history proves this and the structures of the religions themselves.

Hinduism is a loose collection of superstitions and stories, it has no proper central structure or morals to outline. This is why Hindutva nationalism is largely based on anti-Muslim sentiment by atheists which use Hindu as a label, rather than actual religiosity.

Islam is a martial religion with a rigid moral & ethical code and law system that aligns much with naturalistic morals.
 
.
Indians shouldn't cope about what he says about religion to be honest, Islam is objectively superior to Hindusim, history proves this and the structures of the religions themselves.

Hinduism is a loose collection of superstitions and stories, it has no proper central structure or morals to outline. This is why Hindutva nationalism is largely based on anti-Muslim sentiment by atheists which use Hindu as a label, rather than actual religiosity.

Islam is a martial religion with a rigid moral & ethical code and law system that aligns much with naturalistic morals.

The current day Hindus are ignoramuses.

Rigveda, Manusmiriti sanction beef-eating

A recent photograph of some Hindu protesters demanding a ban on non-vegetarian food in restaurants and government canteens in India made me sit up and take notice. I believe that these protesters are ignorant of what their religion preaches. They are simply going against their own religious scriptures.

Most of the world religions sanctify offering of animals in sacrifice including Hinduism. Hindu scriptures are witnesses to such sacrifices and killings of animals for consumption. References of such commands are replete in Hindu scriptures like Manusmriti, Vedas, Upanishads, Brahmins, Grihsutras, Dharmasutras and others.

This column would not suffice for quoting all such references but a few from different scriptures are imperative to bring home the point and clear the misconceptions:
Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.”

Manusmriti (5 / 35) states: When a man who is properly engaged in a ritual does not eat meat, after his death he will become a sacrificial animal during twenty-one rebirths.

Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, “I eat beef because it is very soft and delicious.”
Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.”
Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.”
Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.”
Vashistha Dharmasutra (11/34) writes, “If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ or worship, he goes to hell.”

Also, comments of some great scholars of Hinduism are also worth noting:
· Hinduism’s greatest propagator Swami Vivekanand said thus: “You will be surprised to know that according to ancient Hindu rites and rituals, a man cannot be a good Hindu who does not eat beef”. (The Complete Works of Swami Vivekanand, vol.3, p. 536).
· Mukandilal writes in his book ‘Cow Slaughter – Horns of a Dilemma’, page 18: “In ancient India, cow-slaughter was considered auspicious on the occasions of some ceremonies. Bride and groom used to sit on the hide of a red ox in front of the ‘Vedi’ (alter).”
· A renowned scholar of scriptures Dr. Pandurang Vaman Kane says, “Bajsancyi Samhita sanctifies beef-eating because of its purity”. (Dharmashastra Vichar Marathi, page 180)
· Adi Shankaracharya’ commentary on Brihdaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says : ‘Odan’ (rice) mixed with meat is called ‘Mansodan’. On being asked whose meat it should be, he answers ‘Uksha’. ‘Uksha’ is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen.
· The book ‘The History and Culture of the Indian People’, published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan, Bombay and edited by renowned historian R.C.Majumdar (Vol.2, page 578) says: “this is said in the Mahabharat that King Rantidev used to kill two thousand other animals in addition to two thousand cows daily in order to give their meat in charity”.

It seems a great majority of the followers of Hinduism are not in contact with their religious scriptures thus falling an easy prey to the fascist forces like the Sangh Parivar who have nothing to offer to the Indian society save hatred. And all Indians know where these hatred-mongers are taking India to?


¯ Avtar Gill
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom