AshishDelhi
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2014
- Messages
- 760
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
I agree some what. There are 2 things here. Economic backwardness and social backwardness. Muslims can and do get benefits if they are economically poor. Since they do not have any caste so Indian govt cannot create castes in Islam. That will be interfering in religion. What do you suggest? Should Muslims be identified as different castes..obc, creamy layer, sc, st etc.1. That's a long discussion and I don't really have the patience to repeat what has been said many number of times.
2. No, You don't. Those who did not wanted to live have left and those who decided to stay belong to this land and this land belongs to them...
If you are original inhabitants, so are we. It doesn't matter whether we converted or not. In your loony swamy's own words, our ancestors were Hindus/Buddhists and they converted. So you giving examples of Americas is misplaced. My question is quite simple... How is it justified that Hindus SC/ST/OBC can enjoy reservation(Even a developed group like Marathas get reservation) but when it comes backwards among muslims, you suddenly develop a cold feet...
Well I have a similar case to say, yes one should get reservation based on one's financial background regardless of his religion/caste.... But if backwards of Hindu religion can get reservation then why should backwards of muslims/Christians not get it....? And please don't come back with, muslims don't have caste system. Yes muslims don't have caste system and that is the reason they are not differentiated when they enter mosques, they can lead prayers, worship side by side(Yes there is no discrimination in religion but their financial status doesn't change with their change of religion). So when it comes to citizen rights, it is Government's responsibility to look after its citizens...