Maulana Madaudi a positive or negative figure in Pakistani Politics and History

[Indus Pakistan]

before construction of masjid

Pakistan is not a masjid so stop using a flawed analogy.

 

[Yankee-stani]

Pakistan is not a masjid so stop using a flawed analogy.

Eid Mubarak Chacha Indus

 

[Silverblaze]

Pakistan before its emergence had multiple enemies - Liberal fascists like ANP - Corrupt feudals and many religious organizations.

To this day the same people are anti state.

Anyone, may they be liberals, feudals or religious clerics - if they undermine Pakistan's state under any excuse whatsoever, you are the enemy. The problem is sadly, many Pakistanis melt if the enemy is muslim and pretends to serve islam while in reality harming Pakistan.

Thats why TTP caused so much confusion.

Now Mr. Madudi was jealous of Quaid and the league because he considered religion his domain. Just like many corrupt molvies today.
In radio Pakistan he once declared fight in kashmir not a jihad just like his successors recently declared Pak army shaheeds fighting TTP not shaheeds.

He was also sentenced to death in a military trial after the 1953 anti mirzai riots in lahore. Ahmedis should have been declared non muslims but the way he attacked the state and govt of already unstable Pakistan with indian army on the border, it was unacceptable.

 

[Pakistansdefender]

I can see why he opposed the creation of Pakistan: it left millions of Muslims behind in a Hindu India. Imagine if there was no Partition and it was all one country, the Muslim population would be a political force to reckon it.



True. He accepted Pakistan because it was there, whether he liked it or not.

That is the thing I hear from many Indian Muslims specially. Some even have a complex. Some even hate us for the reason of leaving them toothless unable to defend themselves. Always subservient, always under the mighty hindu.
Even the recent pogroms ensured this theory in their minds. That Hindus can insult us, can call us names, can abuse of God and prophet, can kill us in broad day light and we have to live by it. We have to live justifying our loyalty to the state. We have to declare our hatred against pakistan (though we don't hate them). We have accept this hindu rule over us. We have to become second class citizen. And for this in their they bakme pakistan .
Which is not right. We are in majority unlike them. We are like 97 percent in all 5 states of Pakistan including j and k.
Even if punjab was not divided we were in majority like 85 eprcnt.
It was our natural right to live the way we want. We simply cannot live in united India like they do. We cannot justify living in our own land and justifying that where we came from to a local Hindu. We in majority simple can't. It would be a disaster.
The Muslims of India said they choose India. So, their prefered country should protect them no matter what.
Why you have to see it in Pakistan's context? Why so much obsessed with pakistan?
Though you balme Indian Muslims 3 times a day for living Pakistanis, we love them surely, feel their pain, but feel. No other kinship as Syrian Muslims, Turkish Muslims, Saudi Muslims.
It's them living dual lives, we have moved ahead. Indians Hindus and ruling party live in 1947 and they remind Muslims of India daily about that.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Eid Mubarak Chacha Indus

Khair Mubarak Osman.

 

[maxpayne]

it was a masjid Where muslims can follow their religion with peace.
But you can always differ with me

Pakistan is not a masjid so stop using a flawed analogy.

 

[HAIDER]

View attachment 635301
View attachment 635303

@AgNoStiC MuSliM

Maulana Maududi is a controversial figure in Pakistani Political history he opposed Pakistan on ideological front by claiming it was un Islamic hence even going as far as calling it Nejistan His followers claim he had a change of heart secularists claim he is the root of all the problems in the country.

Will be back with first hand interesting encounter with his son lives in US.. lol

 

[Samlee]

I can see why he opposed the creation of Pakistan: it left millions of Muslims behind in a Hindu India. Imagine if there was no Partition and it was all one country, the Muslim population would be a political force to reckon it.

Nope Even Then We Constituted Only 25% of The Entire Indian Population

 

[Sinnerman108]

Maulana Maududi is a controversial figure in Pakistani Political history he opposed Pakistan on ideological front by claiming it was un Islamic hence even going as far as calling it Nejistan His followers claim he had a change of heart secularists claim he is the root of all the problems in the country.

Indeed he was a hypocrite
he deserved to be sent to the gallows immediately

It is only because of him, that we saw a line of molvis claiming political power as birth right.

He was a takfiri guy who opposed Pakistan right uptil partition and after partition conveniently jumped ship and hijacked Pakistan to start his agenda of oppressing other minorities like Ahmedis. And I say this despite the fact that my qattar Ahle Hadith family members consider him as a saint.

I am glad you are free to speak your mind, and form a factual opinion.

 

[Yankee-stani]

@AgNoStiC MuSliM


Will be back with first hand interesting encounter with his son lives in US.. lol

Wasnt his son a medical doctor based here I knew Maudadudi passed here in the late 70s

 

[Fawad alam]

People without knowledge can say any thing and by copy/pasting propaganda material from social media they are thinking themselves as great scholars.

In reality Maulana Maududi was great philosopher and thinker of his time, he was controversial mainly because he was not following Madrasa system or maslak of that time and that's why many scholars from Deoband maslak specially opposed him and you guys are not capable enough to judge his Islamic philosophy and knowledge that's why no need to discuss here.

He was never in favor of united India and always supports TWO NATION THEORY that's why he always was in conflict with Jamat Ulma Hind in this matter , You people need to read his books instead of propaganda material from facebook/google.

He wrote two remarkable books between 1937-39 ( Masla-e-Qaumiat and Muslaman aur maujuda syasi kashmakash) against Indain national congress and Jamat Ulma hind's nationalism movement and that time he provided Muslim league the required intellectual ammunition to counter, study of these books were once consider a must for leaders of Muslim league.

He created a parallel political party against Muslim league because he wants persons with good Islamic ideology in politics of Indian Muslims not just feudal lords for rule, you people can think whatever in this matter this is debatable in my opinion.

Supporting Pakistan army in Bengal is also his biggest crime don't forget, You guys can surely call him a traitor due to this act.

Please read if you are not a keyboard warrior:

https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/masla-e-qaumiyat-abul-a-la-maududi-ebooks

https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/musal...-kashmakash-part-001-abul-a-la-maududi-ebooks

lastly only FYI he was the second person in history whose funeral was prayed in absence in Makkah succeeding King Najashi Rehmatullah.

 

[Verve]

People without knowledge can say any thing and by copy/pasting propaganda material from social media they are thinking themselves as great scholars.

In reality Maulana Maududi was great philosopher and thinker of his time, he was controversial mainly because he was not following Madrasa system or maslak of that time and that's why many scholars from Deoband maslak specially opposed him and you guys are not capable enough to judge his Islamic philosophy and knowledge that's why no need to discuss here.

He was never in favor of united India and always supports TWO NATION THEORY that's why he always was in conflict with Jamat Ulma Hind in this matter , You people need to read his books instead of propaganda material from facebook/google.

He wrote two remarkable books between 1937-39 ( Masla-e-Qaumiat and Muslaman aur maujuda syasi kashmakash) against Indain national congress and Jamat Ulma hind's nationalism movement and that time he provided Muslim league the required intellectual ammunition to counter, study of these books were once consider a must for leaders of Muslim league.

He created a parallel political party against Muslim league because he wants persons with good Islamic ideology in politics of Indian Muslims not just feudal lords for rule, you people can think whatever in this matter this is debatable in my opinion.

Supporting Pakistan army in Bengal is also his biggest crime don't forget, You guys can surely call him a traitor due to this act.

Please read if you are not a keyboard warrior:

https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/masla-e-qaumiyat-abul-a-la-maududi-ebooks

https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/musal...-kashmakash-part-001-abul-a-la-maududi-ebooks

lastly only FYI he was the second person in history whose funeral was prayed in absence in Makkah succeeding King Najashi Rehmatullah.

Wholly agreed.

Allama Iqbal praised him as well. Fully supported Objectives Resolution.

Majority haters here stink of sectarianism - all fed by their firqay mullay and babays against this great man!

 

[pak-marine]

Maulana Maududi is a controversial figure in Pakistani Political history he opposed Pakistan on ideological front by claiming it was un Islamic hence even going as far as calling it Nejistan His followers claim he had a change of heart secularists claim he is the root of all the problems in the country.

Jamat e Islami is an off shoot of Muslim brother hood thats where terrorist mind set rose from Bin Laden was inspired by these so are many al qaeeda and isis people.

 

[M.Bison]

I can see why he opposed the creation of Pakistan: it left millions of Muslims behind in a Hindu India. Imagine if there was no Partition and it was all one country, the Muslim population would be a political force to reckon it.



True. He accepted Pakistan because it was there, whether he liked it or not.

Politically Numbers don't mean anything. 200 million + is still a lot of people but we can see what's happening to the Muslims in India. The fact that there are 800k troops in the only Muslim province and the destruction and rape of Hyderabadi Muslims post-partition are just a few examples out of many on how India treated Muslim political forces..

There are so many examples of how smaller minorities have gotten rights with fractional numbers. Look at jews in America they hold a huge amount of political sway and influence and they are 6-8 million out of 300 million. Compared to blacks who have a lot of population but they are marginalized. If Muslims in India kept their Muslim identity instead of shunning it for Bharat Mata than they would have a leg to stand on. Now they are forced to say Jai Shri ram on the streets. The day Muslims believed in Hindu secularism is the day Muslims were marginalized politically. The ones that didn't were able to create Pakistan. Thankfully Pakistanis were able to see the wolf in sheep's clothing that is called Hindu-secularism.
Indians love to cry about Pakistan but they could easily make peace with Pakistan. A simple fair plebiscite on both sides in Kashmir would solve the problem. Instead liberal Hindus want to dominate Pakistan and Muslims in this neighborhood. That's not going to end well for both sides.

 

[Itachi]

Just had some great quote by Madaudi in my mind regarding Pathans.

Here it is

https://twitter.com/x/status/1254118668746833924

\

He didn't say that....you need to read the whole sentence. And who said this book was written by Maududi?

Oh this Syed business makes me roll my eyes.

Beware of sources from Twitter.....our Indian friend doesn't even know he got hoodwinked.