StingRoy
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,735
- Reaction score
- 0
unhoon ne 150 saal hum ko katal kiya hum un ki english ko bhi na mary?
More like 350 years Imran bhai.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
unhoon ne 150 saal hum ko katal kiya hum un ki english ko bhi na mary?
IF Khalistan movement seekers who took up arms against the govt= Freedom fighters
THEN Baluchistan fighters= Freedom Fighters
Criteria are the same for both. They both feel they want to succeeded from the union so as to speak and both went violent to achieve their means
Khalistan movt was much well organized and had a much greater op capacity as compared to the BLA. BLA on a good day will stop a bus full of unarmed civilians and shoot 18 non-Balochs, Khalistan fighters on the other hand brought down planes.
The sit on ground was pretty different as well, Balochistan just has a flag and a national anthem and govt in exile based in Israel(see their blog). Khalistan had all that and was even running it's own mint and circulating currency ! The only reason you guys overcame the Khalistan movt was because Benazir handed over details of Khalistan fighters, safe havens, financers, etc(compiled by ISI) to India. That list made all the difference.
But in your primitive assumption, yes many Indians do view BLA as freedom fighters, just check out their youtube or Fb accounts, Indians flock to them as pigeons do to grain.
What about BLA, granddad? How are they getting their support?
Hahahaha, I might have my share of white hair but I'm not that old, but well who am I to say. Time flies.
I specialize in the Taliban but I guess I can do a bit of math and say that BLA has very limited op capacity. They don't need much funding, throwing about 60 grenades in a year or shooting 90 civilians with about 3 bullets each wont cost you more than PKR 40,000 per annum. I'm sure traitors like Baramdagh Bugti and Balach Marri resting their back sides comfortably in Switzerland and England respectively can afford to fund an insurgency on such a limited scale.
History is written by the victors.
Khalistan movt was much well organized and had a much greater op capacity as compared to the BLA. BLA on a good day will stop a bus full of unarmed civilians and shoot 18 non-Balochs, Khalistan fighters on the other hand brought down planes.
The sit on ground was pretty different as well, Balochistan just has a flag and a national anthem and govt in exile based in Israel(see their blog). Khalistan had all that and was even running it's own mint and circulating currency ! The only reason you guys overcame the Khalistan movt was because Benazir handed over details of Khalistan fighters, safe havens, financers, etc(compiled by ISI) to India. That list made all the difference.
But in your primitive assumption, yes many Indians do view BLA as freedom fighters, just check out their youtube or Fb accounts, Indians flock to them as pigeons do to grain.
Khalistan movt was much well organized and had a much greater op capacity as compared to the BLA. BLA on a good day will stop a bus full of unarmed civilians and shoot 18 non-Balochs, Khalistan fighters on the other hand brought down planes.
What's your point? Are you trying to gauge the inspiration of people looking for freedom by the amount of damage they inflicted on civilians?
What prevented you to provide safe haven to Khalistanis once again like you do for Kashmiris? The movement is dead because the issues they had are addressed by Govt of India, not because Benjir did this and that.
I can say -Blah blah , all propoganda from you. The point is who cares about your interpretation, when you don't care about ours? get it? .... and while we are are it - Give Taliban 1/3 of your country too. they think it's rightfully theirs too. Per your logic, because Tom/dick/Harry asks for a seperate country- India should give it. so whats good for the goose is also good for the gander.
whose the primate now? I'd say all you guys still debating it , including me
And what about the non-sikhs Indians who saved thousands from riot, do they deserve a mention too?
1. and the congress activists are NOT Hindus right? by labeling them as Congressies you mean all congress supporters including Siklhs and Muslims and Christians had killed thousands of Sikhs ????????
Your all talk and no stuffing, did you even bother to read what I had written before ranting ? Or did you flunk out of your english class ? I never said Khalistan movt was justified, neither did I say that you should give one-third of your country to them. I was talking about operation capacities of both the outfits, BLA and the Khalistan Movt. Don't know where you got the notion that I was talking of secession.
BTW, primitive and primate are two completely different words, look it up.
let's not get banned for off topic.
They brought down a plane, not planes. And it took like 3-5 people to do that. They are not as well organized as Baluchistan movement.
And no, the grievances were never addressed, the sikhs were brought into the mainstream but their grievances were never addressed.