What's new

Mark 2 Tejas revealed . 1st Flight 2023

@Raj-Hindustani
Your mgihty Tejas is just a troddler in process of learning how to take its first steps. whereas you are childishly looking for a comparison with the war tested full grown Thunder. Let tejas get through teething before throwing it against the experienced opponent. Tejasmk1 has lost its shine even before going into fully operational, Atleast send it to the wertern border for joy ride once before replacing it with mk2 7th gen fighter

I am really supersied that you people always alerted about minorities status in India but you people behave like you don't have any current information about HAL Tejas.

I just take it as a jealousy because PAK can't design and develop even a trainer aircraft, the same reason your don't want to accept that India's can develop aircrafts.
 
.
Pak is much smaller so what it has done with JF is good enough to deter India. .and plus years of experience is invaluable. Can't be compared with new Tejas.

And tejas has become a good aircraft to be taken seriously. Who don't will run the day they joked about it.
 
.
...

HIGH OVER THE INDO PAK BORDERS ARMED WITH BVRS
View attachment 692500

THATS 5 all carrying Derby BVRS

IS this operational ................ OR NOT


Calm down my friend and hold back your horses: First of all You don''t need to write in CAPITALS since that does not change anything or make wrong claims correct.

Second, these are simply AA-11 Archer AAMs and not

Here a slightly larger version of your tiny images (from a tiny fighter) ...

1606922255256.png

and here an enlarged cut-out:

1606922340691.png


These are clearly AA-11.
 
.
Oh YES! The HOLY TEJAS MK2.
Seriously though. The entire Tejas thing is a joke at this point. Its been 20 years since Indians have been screaming on defense forums that they're gonna induct these in the hundreds and their own air force doesn't give a damn about it.
Moreover, Tejas MK2 is literally a copy down of the Gripen, ah yes INDIAN INDEGINIOUS PLANE.
 
. . . . .
Indian incompetence


I tell what's incompetent buying a.chinease fighters with rd93 Russian engine with a max advertised service life of 2200 hours ..it was cheap so you went ahead now 40 percent of your thunders have engine maintenance issues..
you would think you would have learned from.our issues with mig29 rd33 engines which is advertised 4000 hours at twice the cost..

why do you think we went with general.electric for tejas at 5 million each rather than rd93 at 1 million each or rd33 at 2 million each.

we knew the power was good but service life and maintenance was poor
 
.
You cannot fit Chinese components and claim superiority. Even the Russians cannot match the west in sophistication and tech. Chinese systems are inferior even to the russian ones and on the top of that they are unproven in combat.
An spot the Indian.
 
.
with pride
usa,general.electric engine ge404in
israeli litening pod
israeli.elta radar
israeli dash 5 hmd
israeli Derby bvr
Russian r73 wvr
Designed by France, landing gears USA, fly by wire also develop by USA,French and Israeli avionics composite materials technology came from EU
So that's you called it INDIAN INDIGENOUS PRODUCT
 
.
Designed by France, landing gears USA, fly by wire also develop by USA,French and Israeli avionics composite materials technology came from EU
So that's you called it INDIAN INDIGENOUS PRODUCT

rubbish
this,is our own flybewire our own composite and our design.
we used consultancy but it's pure Indian
just like our nuke subs
aircraft carriers
bvr missle
destroyers
frigates
corvettes
mbrl
radars
satellites
 
.
Calm down my friend and hold back your horses: First of all You don''t need to write in CAPITALS since that does not change anything or make wrong claims correct.

Second, these are simply AA-11 Archer AAMs and not

Here a slightly larger version of your tiny images (from a tiny fighter) ...

View attachment 692614
and here an enlarged cut-out:

View attachment 692615

These are clearly AA-11.

You just caught the indian troll lying again.

Thats what we have been doing through all his posts.
 
.
rubbish
this,is our own flybewire our own composite and our design.
we used consultancy but it's pure Indian
just like our nuke subs
aircraft carriers
bvr missle
destroyers
frigates
corvettes
mbrl
radars
satellites
Yeah but reality is different dude
And all these weapons you refer is not indigenous either they are based on old design (Delhi class) or they are using foreign technology in it

Read the history of LCA feasibility report by France fly by wire is developed by USA but you only modified after 1998 nuke test rest of your arguments not worth reading because all weapons you refer is not indigenous at all
rubbish
this,is our own flybewire our own composite and our design.
we used consultancy but it's pure Indian
just like our nuke subs
aircraft carriers
bvr missle
destroyers
frigates
corvettes
mbrl
radars
satellites
Your destroyers is based on old 70 era soviet Design (Modified Kashin class) with lots of radars and sensors come from Russia and Israel, same goes to your frigrates, your aircraft carriers are also based on Russian design with Russian and Israeli radars and electronics etc etc
 
Last edited:
.
Yeah but reality is different dude
And all these weapons you refer is not indigenous either they are based on old design (Delhi class) or they are using foreign technology in it


Your destroyers is based on old 70 era soviet Design (Modified Kashin class) with lots of radars and sensors come from Russia and Israel, same goes to your frigrates, your aircraft carriers are also based on Russian design with Russian and Israeli radars and electronics etc etc

1607020934190.png


1607020978262.png

1607021068333.png


1607021197312.png


these are indian weapons with hitech hyper expenive israeli technology
 
.
Back
Top Bottom