What's new

Maps of empires at their Peak

A tragedy. Greedy lunatics.

Pakistani empire. The only empire that matters to me:


:azn:

That and these two are the only Pakistani origin civilizations and that is all that matter, our nation is still young we have plenty more to create. No Pakistani should be worried.

Map_of_Vedic_India.png


Sikh_Empire-ml.png
 
.
Lot of these maps of Indian based empire extending to Paksitan area and byond are wrong. A part from Gupta and Maurya empire.

And as far as Pakistani empire, lets just say civilizations since our ancestors were peacefull ;) Three names comes to my mind Harappa, Rig Vedic and Gandhara civilizations. The legacy shall continue for another 5000 years.

That and these two are the only Pakistani origin civilizations and that is all that matter, our nation is still young we have plenty more to create. No Pakistani should be worried.

Map_of_Vedic_India.png


Sikh_Empire-ml.png

Porus and Hindu shahis also.
 
.
. .
It's kind of funny you say that. If they were Buddhist then why are there no populations of Buddhist Pakistanis yet there are communities of Pakistani Hindus. Surely if your ancestors were Buddhist there would be a remnant community?

I am talking about a millennia ago, Sindh was majority Buddhist, there is no reason to doubt that gradually the locals started converting to Islam. Before that, the history is full of insistences in which Hinduism and Buddhism competed for converts and perhaps the local demographic changed with the times.

And if you are going to say that the locals were forced, I suggest studying the history of Sindh and you'll find hundreds, if not thousands of tombs of Sufi saints who converted the local inhabitants.

This doesn't mean that Hindus also didn't exist in these areas. They did and still do, they have nothing to do with Indian Hindus, the Hindus in Pakistan are our brothers and successors to the Indus civilisation just like the majority of Pakistani Muslims.

you may question on map ......but it is true srivijaya empire was one of strongest kingdom during 8th to 12th centuries....................which influenced much of Southeast Asia

Srivijaya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

from the same Wikipedia article:



I don't mean any offence but posting from alternative history is probably not the brightest of ideas when you are discussing genuine history.
 
.
That and these two are the only Pakistani origin civilizations and that is all that matter, our nation is still young we have plenty more to create. No Pakistani should be worried.

Map_of_Vedic_India.png

That's the map of our Uttarapatha(North India). :yahoo::yahoo:
 
. .
That's the map of our Uttarapatha(North India). :yahoo::yahoo:

And had nothing to do with Islam or the two nation theory based on Islam.

So nothing to do with Pakistan as well as a corollary.

Pakistan's creation is based on the very assumption that they were jahils before they were converted by the invaders. Nothing pre-Islamic can be Pakistani...
 
.
Yes North India was a part of it as well. :)

You sound so poor mamay, Uttarapatha is the Northern part of our eternal Bharat Varsha, southern part is called Dakshinapatha. (Uttara=north, Dakshina=South). ;) Land between Indus and Radcliffe line is just a breakaway region of our Bharata Varsha. :(

Pakistan's creation is based on the very assumption that they were jahils before they were converted by the invaders. Nothing pre-Islamic can be Pakistani...

In reality those Arabs copied the knowledge from their so called jahil ancestors. One such example was the book named SindHind translation of the mathematics of Brahmagupta(he was from Mewar) which Arabs took from Sindh and later became the foundation of Arabian Algebra of Al Khwarizmi, the Arabian Nights are partly copied from Panchatantra, Vikram-Betal and Jatak tales. The famous physician Ibn Sina learned the earlier medicine of Charaka and Sushruta. ;) I can see how Jahils people were before the arrival Muhammad Bin Qasim. :coffee:
 
Last edited:
.
You sound so poor mamay, Uttarapatha is the Northern part of our eternal Bharat Varsha, southern part is called Dakshinapatha. (Uttara=north, Dakshina=South). ;) Land between Indus and Radcliffe line is just a breakaway region of our Bharata Varsha. :(



In reality those Arabs copied the knowledge from their so called jahil ancestors. One such example was the book named SindHind translation of the mathematics of Brahmagupta(he was from Mewar) which Arabs took from Sindh and later became the foundation of Arabian Algebra of Al Khwarizmi, the Arabian Nights are partly copied from Panchatantra, Vikram-Betal and Jatak tales. The famous physician Ibn Sina learned the earlier medicine of Charaka and Sushruta. ;) I can see how Jahils people were before the arrival Muhammad Bin Qasim. :coffee:

Nothing but hindutva garbage in this post.
 
.
And had nothing to do with Islam or the two nation theory based on Islam.

So nothing to do with Pakistan as well as a corollary.

Pakistan's creation is based on the very assumption that they were jahils before they were converted by the invaders. Nothing pre-Islamic can be Pakistani...

Yes now :mamba: will claim our past :sarcastic:
 
. .
Nothing but hindutva garbage in this post.

This one is truest history being taught to you. :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. [...] The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'."
 
.
This one is truest history being taught to you. :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. [...] The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'."
damn,,,thats some a level trolling in the text books!!:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

these guys really think that pakistan was formed in 13 th century??
 
.
This one is truest history being taught to you. :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. [...] The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'."

Once again you forget I was not educated in Pakistani governmental schools and secondly like I stated before Pakistanis themselves have petitioned for changes in the textbooks. Not to mention most Pakistanis who actually go to school in Pakistan attend private schools that follow a different medium.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom